Masar vs Dayrout: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Masar played against Dayrout in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on December 17, 2025. Final score: 6:0.

Recent form

Masar has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Dayrout has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Masar scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.67. Dayrout scores 0.60 and allows 0.87. Games in this league average 1.89 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Masar's games and 33% of Dayrout's. The Over 2.5 rates are 27% and 13%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Masar has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.10 per game. Masar takes 7.3 shots per game, while Dayrout takes 5.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Masar leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Dayrout leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Masar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Dayrout, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 1.89 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
4 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
MasarDayrout
-1Shots-1
MasarDayrout
-1Shots on target-1
MasarDayrout
0xG0
MasarDayrout
-1Corners-1
MasarDayrout
0Dangerous attacks0
MasarDayrout
-1Fouls-1
MasarDayrout
-1Cards-1
MasarDayrout

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game0.6
MasarDayrout
0.67Goals allowed / game0.87
MasarDayrout
40%Average possession34%
MasarDayrout
2.93Shots on target / game1.8
MasarDayrout

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.27Shots per game5.67
MasarDayrout
2.93Shots on target1.8
MasarDayrout
18.3%Shot conversion10.6%
MasarDayrout
40%Possession34%
MasarDayrout
1.27xG for1.1
MasarDayrout
1.17xG against1.11
MasarDayrout

Shooting quality

Masar: Counter-attackingDayrout: Balanced
MasarDayrout
Accuracy (shots on target)40%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Masar is 120% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - Masar · 1 pts / game - Dayrout

Masar
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
47% W33% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-3
1.73 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Dayrout
LDWLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 122% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - Masar · 0.6 goals / game - Dayrout

Masar is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Masar · 0.87 goals / game - Dayrout

Masar scoring profile: strong

Masar scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 games), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 games).

Dayrout scoring profile: mixed

Dayrout scores in 53% of games (8 of 15 games), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 games).

20Goals scored (season)9
MasarDayrout
10Goals conceded (season)13
MasarDayrout
2Average goals per game1.47
MasarDayrout
9Goals scored (last 5)2
MasarDayrout
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
MasarDayrout

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal53%
MasarDayrout
33%2 goals7%
MasarDayrout
20%3 goals0%
MasarDayrout
13%4 goals0%
MasarDayrout

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal60%
MasarDayrout
13%2 goals20%
MasarDayrout
7%3 goals7%
MasarDayrout
0%4 goals0%
MasarDayrout

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
MasarDayrout
7%BTTS in both halves0%
MasarDayrout
27%Scored in both halves7%
MasarDayrout

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
MasarDayrout
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MasarDayrout
40%BTTS - last 50%
MasarDayrout

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
MasarDayrout
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
MasarDayrout
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
MasarDayrout

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
MasarDayrout
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
MasarDayrout
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MasarDayrout

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Masar · 0.93 pts / game - Dayrout

Masar - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing
Dayrout - half-time state
7% leading73% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)0.93
MasarDayrout
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.2
MasarDayrout
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
MasarDayrout
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.53
MasarDayrout
73%Clean sheet before half-time73%
MasarDayrout
53%No goal before half-time80%
MasarDayrout

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)1.2
MasarDayrout
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
MasarDayrout
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
MasarDayrout
1Average goals (2nd half)0.93
MasarDayrout
67%Clean sheet after half-time53%
MasarDayrout
60%No goal after half-time60%
MasarDayrout

Masar - second-half results

33% W40% D27% L
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Dayrout - second-half results

27% W40% D33% L
14
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Masar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.60
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dayrout - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Masar
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Dayrout
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Dayrout

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaDayrout
Average goals per game▲ 2.001.89▼ 1.47
Both teams scored▼ 33%40%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 27%30%▼ 13%
Clean sheets▲ 53%39%• 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 53%51%▼ 33%
Goal after half-time• 67%68%▲ 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defensive advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Friday Mbeke Godwin⚽ 1
—Islam Salah⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MasarGoalFriday Mbeke Godwin
  2. MasarGoalIslam Salah

FAQ

What was the result of Masar vs Dayrout?

The Second Division match finished Masar 6:0 Dayrout. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Dayrout?

Masar score 1.33 goals per game on average and Dayrout 0.60. The Second Division average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Masar's matches and 33% of Dayrout's.

What form are Masar and Dayrout in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Dayrout 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Dayrout?

The statistical background for Masar vs Dayrout — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.