Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 22 July 2026

Masar vs Tersana: match statistics

Masar crest
Masar
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Tersana crest
Tersana
165%(1.75)
X25%(3.05)
210%(5.00)

Masar exhibits significantly superior form, sitting 2nd in the table and winning 4 of their last 5 matches overall, yielding an impressive 2.4 points per game. The hosts hold an advantage in home goal difference (+7), boasting a high clean sheet rate (63%) and conceding an average of just 0.63 goals per home match. Conversely, Tersana struggles on the road, winning only 13% of away fixtures and scoring a meager 0.38 goals per game, failing to score in 63% of matches. The visitors' negative away goal difference (-5) and poor form in their last 5 outings (1 point per game) further support a convincing home victory. Given all statistics, Masar holds a distinct advantage in every aspect of the game, making them the clear favorite.

Masar vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Masar play Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 15 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tersana: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Masar scores 1.38 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Masar 38%, Tersana 41%. Over 2.5: Masar 32%, Tersana 26%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Masar has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.28. Masar: 8.7 shots per match, Tersana: 8.4.

Match halves

Masar: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71. Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Masar: 76-90+ (12 goals). Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Masar exhibits significantly superior form, sitting 2nd in the table and winning 4 of their last 5 matches overall, yielding an impressive 2.4 points per game. The hosts hold an advantage in home goal difference (+7), boasting a high clean sheet rate (63%) and conceding an average of just 0.63 goals per home match. Conversely, Tersana struggles on the road, winning only 13% of away fixtures and scoring a meager 0.38 goals per game, failing to score in 63% of matches. The visitors' negative away goal difference (-5) and poor form in their last 5 outings (1 point per game) further support a convincing home victory. Given all statistics, Masar holds a distinct advantage in every aspect of the game, making them the clear favorite.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

78Possession (%)22
MasarTersana
14Shots5
MasarTersana
0Shots on target3
MasarTersana
1.44xG0.72
MasarTersana
11Corners2
MasarTersana
78Dangerous attacks27
MasarTersana
10Fouls12
MasarTersana
0Cards0
MasarTersana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match0.91
MasarTersana
0.85Goals conceded / match0.94
MasarTersana
48%Average possession44%
MasarTersana
3.41Shots on target / match3.35
MasarTersana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.71Shots per match8.38
MasarTersana
3.41Shots on target3.35
MasarTersana
15.9%Shot conversion10.9%
MasarTersana
48%Possession44%
MasarTersana
1.3xG for1.28
MasarTersana
1.09xG against1.14
MasarTersana

Shooting quality

Masar: Efficient finishingTersana: Balanced
MasarTersana
Accuracy (shots on target)39%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar
LWDLW
Season result split
44% W29% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-10-9
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Tersana
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-16-10
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-9-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 52% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Masar · 0.91 goals / match - Tersana

Masar is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Masar · 0.94 goals / match - Tersana

Masar scoring profile: strong

Masar scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

47Goals scored (season)31
MasarTersana
29Goals conceded (season)32
MasarTersana
2.24Average goals in match1.85
MasarTersana
7Goals scored (last 5)7
MasarTersana
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
MasarTersana

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal56%
MasarTersana
38%2 goals21%
MasarTersana
18%3 goals12%
MasarTersana
12%4 goals3%
MasarTersana

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal65%
MasarTersana
21%2 goals21%
MasarTersana
3%3 goals6%
MasarTersana
0%4 goals3%
MasarTersana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time24%
MasarTersana
6%BTTS in both halves6%
MasarTersana
32%Scored in both halves18%
MasarTersana

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
MasarTersana
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
MasarTersana
20%BTTS - last 580%
MasarTersana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
MasarTersana
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
MasarTersana
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
MasarTersana

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
MasarTersana
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
MasarTersana
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
MasarTersana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.65 pts / match - Masar · 1.24 pts / match - Tersana

Masar - half-time state
38% leading50% draw12% trailing
Tersana - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per match (1st half)1.24
MasarTersana
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.53
MasarTersana
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
MasarTersana
0.91Average goals (1st half)0.94
MasarTersana
74%Clean sheet before half-time65%
MasarTersana
50%No goal before half-time59%
MasarTersana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.06
MasarTersana
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
MasarTersana
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
MasarTersana
1.24Average goals (2nd half)0.91
MasarTersana
53%Clean sheet after half-time56%
MasarTersana
59%No goal after half-time68%
MasarTersana

Masar - second-half results

32% W32% R35% P
56
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tersana - second-half results

18% W53% R29% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tersana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Masar
ScoredConceded
11
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaTersana
Average goals in match 2.241.95 1.85
Both teams scored 38%41% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%32% 26%
Clean sheets 38%38% 35%
Goal before half-time 59%53% 53%
Goal after half-time 76%67% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Masar 1 - 0 - 0 Tersana. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tersana
0 : 1
Masar

FAQ

What was the result of Masar vs Tersana?

The Second Division match finished Masar 0:2 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Tersana?

Masar score 1.38 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.91. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Masar's matches and 41% of Tersana's.

What form are Masar and Tersana in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tersana 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Tersana?

The statistical background for Masar vs Tersana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.