Mbeya City vs Coastal Union: match statistics
Mbeya City vs Coastal Union: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mbeya City play Coastal Union in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 13 May 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Mbeya City: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Coastal Union: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mbeya City scores 0.78 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Coastal Union scores 1.03 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mbeya City 31%, Coastal Union 50%. Over 2.5: Mbeya City 28%, Coastal Union 37%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Coastal Union has higher xG: 1.19 vs 0.99. Mbeya City: 4.7 shots per match, Coastal Union: 5.8.
Match halves
Mbeya City: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.28. Coastal Union: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.37.
Goals by minute
Mbeya City: 16-30 (7 goals). Coastal Union: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Both teams struggle to secure wins: Mbeya have only a 9% win rate at home and as many as 55% draws, while Coastal win just 8% of away matches and lose 67%. The hosts show better home defence — they concede 1.27 goals on average with an average xG against of 1.24, whereas the visitors concede 1.67 goals away with xG against 1.59. Offensively the numbers are low: Mbeya score 0.73 goals at home with an average xG of 0.95 and 4.9 shots per match (1.5 on target), while Coastal have 0.58 goals away with xG 1.11 and 7.08 shots (2.33 on target). In the last 5 matches Coastal have scored 8 goals and Mbeya only 2, but the visitors have been shut out in 75% of away games, whereas the hosts failed to score at home in 55% of matches. Considering the hosts’ high propensity for draws and Coastal’s poor away finishing, I expect a share of the points.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mbeya City | Coastal Union | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.58 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mbeya City is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Mbeya City · 1.6 pts / match - Coastal Union
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coastal Union is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
0.78 goals / match - Mbeya City · 1.03 goals / match - Coastal Union
Mbeya City scores in 50% of matches (16 of 32 matches), while Coastal Union keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
Coastal Union scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mbeya City
Over / Under — Coastal Union
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coastal Union is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Mbeya City · 1.37 pts / match - Coastal Union
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mbeya City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Coastal Union - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mbeya City
Coastal Union
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mbeya City | Liga | Coastal Union | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.06 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 35% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 28% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 34% | 39% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 66% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mbeya City 0 - 0 - 1 Coastal Union. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mbeya City vs Coastal Union?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mbeya City 0:2 Coastal Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mbeya City vs Coastal Union?
Mbeya City score 0.78 goals per game on average and Coastal Union 1.03. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Mbeya City's matches and 50% of Coastal Union's.
What form are Mbeya City and Coastal Union in?
Over the last 5 games Mbeya City have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Coastal Union 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mbeya City vs Coastal Union?
The statistical background for Mbeya City vs Coastal Union — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.