MEAP Nisou vs AE Zakakiou: match statistics
MEAP Nisou enters this fixture as the favorite, notwithstanding their underwhelming home form (29% home win rate). The hosts display superior offensive efficiency, averaging 1.14 goals per home game, whereas AE Zakakiou manages a meager 0.43 goals on the road and has failed to score in 71% of their away fixtures. The visitors are suffering from a dismal away record, with a 71% loss rate and just one away victory this season. A crucial factor is the advantage in possession (51% vs 41%) alongside superior xG stats (1.34 vs 0.96), indicating a higher quality of chances created by the home side. Considering both sides share an identical goal difference (-8), MEAP Nisou's home advantage and stronger offensive metrics point towards a home win, though a draw remains a plausible outcome given the inconsistent form of both squads.
MEAP Nisou vs AE Zakakiou: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MEAP Nisou play AE Zakakiou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 3 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. AE Zakakiou: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. AE Zakakiou scores 1.10 and concedes 1.79. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MEAP Nisou 48%, AE Zakakiou 52%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 48%, AE Zakakiou 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.12. MEAP Nisou: 7.5 shots per match, AE Zakakiou: 5.1.
Match halves
MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. AE Zakakiou: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). AE Zakakiou: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
MEAP Nisou enters this fixture as the favorite, notwithstanding their underwhelming home form (29% home win rate). The hosts display superior offensive efficiency, averaging 1.14 goals per home game, whereas AE Zakakiou manages a meager 0.43 goals on the road and has failed to score in 71% of their away fixtures. The visitors are suffering from a dismal away record, with a 71% loss rate and just one away victory this season. A crucial factor is the advantage in possession (51% vs 41%) alongside superior xG stats (1.34 vs 0.96), indicating a higher quality of chances created by the home side. Considering both sides share an identical goal difference (-8), MEAP Nisou's home advantage and stronger offensive metrics point towards a home win, though a draw remains a plausible outcome given the inconsistent form of both squads.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MEAP Nisou | AE Zakakiou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.57 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AE Zakakiou is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.4 pts / match - AE Zakakiou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while AE Zakakiou keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).
AE Zakakiou scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — MEAP Nisou
Over / Under — AE Zakakiou
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AE Zakakiou is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.28 pts / match - AE Zakakiou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
AE Zakakiou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MEAP Nisou
AE Zakakiou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| MEAP Nisou | Liga | AE Zakakiou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.79 | 2.72 | ▲ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 49% | • 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 30% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 77% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs AE Zakakiou?
The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 1:0 AE Zakakiou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs AE Zakakiou?
MEAP Nisou score 1.07 goals per game on average and AE Zakakiou 1.10. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 52% of AE Zakakiou's.
What form are MEAP Nisou and AE Zakakiou in?
Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and AE Zakakiou 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs AE Zakakiou?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs AE Zakakiou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.