MEAP Nisou vs Doxa: match statistics
MEAP Nisou vs Doxa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MEAP Nisou play Doxa in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Doxa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Doxa scores 1.17 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MEAP Nisou 48%, Doxa 45%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 48%, Doxa 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Doxa has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.42. MEAP Nisou: 7.5 shots per match, Doxa: 5.9.
Match halves
MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. Doxa: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). Doxa: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Doxa is the favorite in this matchup: they sit 4th in the table versus MEAP’s 7th and have 11 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 8. Doxa averages 1.6 points per game in their last 5 matches (record 2W, 2D, 1L), while MEAP manages only 0.6 points per game (1W, 4L). Offensively Doxa scores 1.83 goals on the road on average with 11.5 shots and 5.17 on target per away match and a 17% conversion rate, whereas MEAP at home averages 1.00 goal, 9.78 shots and 3.78 on target with a 10% conversion. Defensively MEAP concedes 2.08 goals per home game and has a negative home goal difference (-14), while Doxa concedes only 1.17 goals away and has a positive away goal difference (+8); the visitors’ xG is 1.57 versus the hosts’ 1.34, confirming the visitors’ edge in chance creation. Additionally MEAP fail to score in 31% of home matches, whereas Doxa are goalless in just 8% of their away fixtures, therefore I back an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MEAP Nisou | Doxa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.59 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Doxa is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 0.8 pts / match - Doxa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Doxa is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.17 goals / match - Doxa
Doxa is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.72 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.21 goals / match - Doxa
MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
Doxa scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — MEAP Nisou
Over / Under — Doxa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Doxa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MEAP Nisou
Doxa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| MEAP Nisou | Liga | Doxa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.79 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 49% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 30% | • 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 72% | ▼ 66% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): MEAP Nisou 2 - 0 - 0 Doxa. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs Doxa?
The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 0:2 Doxa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and Doxa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 2, Doxa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs Doxa?
MEAP Nisou score 1.07 goals per game on average and Doxa 1.17. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 45% of Doxa's.
What form are MEAP Nisou and Doxa in?
Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Doxa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs Doxa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs Doxa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.