MEAP Nisou vs Halkanoras: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MEAP Nisou play Halkanoras in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 13 December 2025 at 13:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Halkanoras: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Halkanoras scores 1.62 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MEAP Nisou 48%, Halkanoras 55%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 48%, Halkanoras 62%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. MEAP Nisou: 7.5 shots per match, Halkanoras: 7.1.

Match halves

MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. Halkanoras: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 1.03.

Goals by minute

MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). Halkanoras: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
9Shots7
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
2Shots on target5
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
1.3xG1.31
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
3Corners0
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
79Dangerous attacks71
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
-1Fouls-1
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
-1Cards-1
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match1.62
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
1.72Goals conceded / match1.28
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
40%Average possession41%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
2.9Shots on target / match3.38
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.55Shots per match7.14
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
2.9Shots on target3.38
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
14.2%Shot conversion22.7%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
40%Possession41%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
1.42xG for1.3
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
1.48xG against1.16
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

Shooting quality

MEAP Nisou: Counter-attackingHalkanoras: Counter-attacking
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
Accuracy (shots on target)38%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Halkanoras is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 2.2 pts / match - Halkanoras

MEAP Nisou
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W17% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-10
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Halkanoras
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W21% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-10
1.55 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Halkanoras is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.62 goals / match - Halkanoras

Halkanoras is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.28 goals / match - Halkanoras

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: strong

MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Halkanoras keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).

Halkanoras scoring profile: very strong

Halkanoras scores in 79% of matches (23 of 29 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

31Goals scored (season)47
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
50Goals conceded (season)37
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
2.79Average goals in match2.9
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
5Goals scored (last 5)7
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
10Goals conceded (last 5)1
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal79%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
28%2 goals45%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
10%3 goals24%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
3%4 goals10%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal66%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
52%2 goals41%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
24%3 goals17%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
10%4 goals3%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time28%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
3%BTTS in both halves7%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
17%Scored in both halves31%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
60%BTTS - last 520%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MEAP Nisou - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing
Halkanoras - half-time state
24% leading34% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.07
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.59
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.38
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
34%Clean sheet before half-time45%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
52%No goal before half-time48%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.66
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)1.03
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.52
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
48%Clean sheet after half-time62%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras
66%No goal after half-time41%
MEAP NisouHalkanoras

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Halkanoras - second-half results

45% W31% R24% P
31
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding188%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Halkanoras - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
8
16
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Halkanoras
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
4
8
16-30
7
9
31-45
7
3
46-60
12
8
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Halkanoras

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MEAP NisouLigaHalkanoras
Average goals in match 2.792.72 2.90
Both teams scored 48%49% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 62%
Clean sheets 24%30% 34%
Goal before half-time 83%72% 79%
Goal after half-time 69%77% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs Halkanoras?

The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 1:2 Halkanoras. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs Halkanoras?

MEAP Nisou score 1.07 goals per game on average and Halkanoras 1.62. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 55% of Halkanoras's.

What form are MEAP Nisou and Halkanoras in?

Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Halkanoras 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs Halkanoras?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs Halkanoras: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.