Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of September 07, 2026

MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis: match statistics

MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
2 : 4half-time 0:1
Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis
110%(0.00)
X15%(0.00)
275%(0.00)

Nea Salamis is the decisive favorite for this meeting, sitting in 1st place with an impressive record of 19 wins, 2 draws, and not a single defeat this season. The visiting team displays phenomenal away form with 100% efficiency (10 consecutive away wins) and an average of 2.1 goals per game against merely 0.4 conceded. MEAP Nisou occupies the 7th position with very poor home form (27% wins, 64% losses at home) and a negative goal difference of -11 in home matches. The difference in class is immense – Nea Salamis has 70% clean sheets away, while the hosts failed to score in 36% of their home games. All statistics, from possession (57% vs 50%), through xG (1.84 vs 1.36), to the last 5 matches (15 points vs 4 points), unequivocally indicate a certain victory for the visitors.

MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

MEAP Nisou played against Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Recent form

MEAP Nisou has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Nea Salamis has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

MEAP Nisou scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.64. Nea Salamis scores 1.86 and allows 0.38. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of MEAP Nisou's games and 33% of Nea Salamis's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 38%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 1.92 to 1.47 per game. MEAP Nisou takes 7.9 shots per game, while Nea Salamis takes 12.5.

First-half and second-half trends

MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 62% and scores 0.76 after halftime.

When the teams score

MEAP Nisou's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Nea Salamis, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nea Salamis is the decisive favorite for this meeting, sitting in 1st place with an impressive record of 19 wins, 2 draws, and not a single defeat this season. The visiting team displays phenomenal away form with 100% efficiency (10 consecutive away wins) and an average of 2.1 goals per game against merely 0.4 conceded. MEAP Nisou occupies the 7th position with very poor home form (27% wins, 64% losses at home) and a negative goal difference of -11 in home matches. The difference in class is immense – Nea Salamis has 70% clean sheets away, while the hosts failed to score in 36% of their home games. All statistics, from possession (57% vs 50%), through xG (1.84 vs 1.36), to the last 5 matches (15 points vs 4 points), unequivocally indicate a certain victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 3
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
10Shots17
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
4Shots on target9
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.22xG2.12
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1Corners4
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
42Dangerous attacks58
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
-1Fouls-1
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
-1Cards-1
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1Goals scored / game1.86
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.64Goals allowed / game0.38
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
42%Average possession46%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
3.05Shots on target / game4.86
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.86Shots per game12.52
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
3.05Shots on target4.86
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
12.7%Shot conversion14.8%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
42%Possession46%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.47xG for1.92
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.54xG against0.94
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Shooting quality

MEAP Nisou: Counter-attackingNea Salamis: Counter-attacking
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nea Salamis is 275% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 3 pts / game - Nea Salamis

MEAP Nisou
LLWDL
Season result split
32% W18% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-11
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Nea Salamis
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
90% W10% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-2-0
2.81 pts / game · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
10-0-0
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 86% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.86 goals / game - Nea Salamis

Nea Salamis is 332% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.64 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 0.38 goals / game - Nea Salamis

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: more difficult

MEAP Nisou scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 67% (14 of 21 meczów).

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 90% of games (19 of 21 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)39
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
36Goals conceded (season)8
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
2.64Average goals per game2.24
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
4Goals scored (last 5)11
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal90%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
23%2 goals67%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
9%3 goals19%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
5%4 goals10%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal33%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
45%2 goals5%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
23%3 goals0%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
9%4 goals0%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time24%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0%BTTS in both halves5%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
18%Scored in both halves43%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
40%BTTS - last 560%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 2.24 pts / game - Nea Salamis

MEAP Nisou - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing
Nea Salamis - half-time state
62% leading38% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per game (1st half)2.24
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.59Goals scored (1st half)1.1
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.91Goals conceded (1st half)0.24
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.33
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
41%Clean sheet before half-time76%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
55%No goal before half-time29%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per game (2nd half)2.1
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.14
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
1.14Average goals (2nd half)0.9
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
55%Clean sheet after half-time86%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis
64%No goal after half-time38%
MEAP NisouNea Salamis

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

23% W41% R36% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nea Salamis - second-half results

57% W38% R5% P
47
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 90%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

MEAP Nisou - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Nea Salamis - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.60
Goals scored / game1.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game2.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+7+1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
12
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
9
3
16-30
6
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
3
3
61-75
10
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.98
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
29%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MEAP NisouLigaNea Salamis
Average goals per game 2.642.58 2.24
Both teams scored 45%48% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%46% 38%
Clean sheets 27%30% 67%
Goal before half-time 77%73% 71%
Goal after half-time 68%76% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+-5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Eric Appiah Ansu⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Daniel Alejandro Pérez Córdova⚽ 1
Giorgos Pavlides⚽ 1
Konstantinos Anthimou⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nea SalamisGoalDaniel Alejandro Pérez Córdova
  2. MEAP NisouGoalEric Appiah Ansu
  3. Nea SalamisGoalKonstantinos Anthimou
  4. Nea SalamisGoalGiorgos Pavlides

Head-to-head

Record from MEAP Nisou's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Nea Salamis. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Nea Salamis
1 : 0
MEAP Nisou
MEAP Nisou
1 : 4
Nea Salamis

FAQ

What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis?

The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 2:4 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and Nea Salamis?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 0, Nea Salamis won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis?

MEAP Nisou score 1.00 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.86. The Second Division average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 45% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 33% of Nea Salamis's.

What form are MEAP Nisou and Nea Salamis in?

Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Nea Salamis 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis?

The statistical background for MEAP Nisou vs Nea Salamis — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.