Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
Nea Salamis is displaying dominant form as the league leaders with an impressive record of 13 wins, 2 draws, and no losses this season. The hosts win 71% of their home matches, keeping clean sheets at the same rate, while averaging just 0.29 goals conceded per game. MEAP Nisou occupies a distant 7th place with a 6-3-6 record and defensive issues, conceding an average of 1.57 goals away. The quality gap between the teams is vast – Nea Salamis boasts a positive goal difference of +8 at home, while the visitors have a negative -2 away. Recent form confirms the hosts' superiority: 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, whereas MEAP Nisou has averaged only 1.4 points per match in this period. All indicators, including higher xG (2.06 vs 1.83), better efficiency and ball possession (60% vs 55%), clearly point to a certain Nea Salamis victory.
Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nea Salamis played against MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Nea Salamis has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. MEAP Nisou has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Nea Salamis scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 0.33. MEAP Nisou scores 1.20 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 27% of Nea Salamis's games and 53% of MEAP Nisou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 53%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 2.01 to 1.66 per game. Nea Salamis takes 13.4 shots per game, while MEAP Nisou takes 9.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 53% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.47 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nea Salamis's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For MEAP Nisou, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis is displaying dominant form as the league leaders with an impressive record of 13 wins, 2 draws, and no losses this season. The hosts win 71% of their home matches, keeping clean sheets at the same rate, while averaging just 0.29 goals conceded per game. MEAP Nisou occupies a distant 7th place with a 6-3-6 record and defensive issues, conceding an average of 1.57 goals away. The quality gap between the teams is vast – Nea Salamis boasts a positive goal difference of +8 at home, while the visitors have a negative -2 away. Recent form confirms the hosts' superiority: 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, whereas MEAP Nisou has averaged only 1.4 points per match in this period. All indicators, including higher xG (2.06 vs 1.83), better efficiency and ball possession (60% vs 55%), clearly point to a certain Nea Salamis victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nea Salamis | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nea Salamis is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.4 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.2 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
Nea Salamis is 445% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.33 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.8 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
Nea Salamis scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
MEAP Nisou scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 73% (11 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.07 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.2 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 53% of games and wins 87%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nea Salamis
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nea Salamis | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.13 | 2.54 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 73% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Nea SalamisGoalKonstantinos Anthimou
Head-to-head
Record from Nea Salamis's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against MEAP Nisou. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 1:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou?
Nea Salamis score 1.80 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.20. The Second Division average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Nea Salamis's matches and 53% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are Nea Salamis and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nea Salamis vs MEAP Nisou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.