MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: match statistics
PAEEK appear to be the favorites for this match, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to MEAP Nisou's 7th position. The hosts are in very poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a negative goal difference of -13, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per game. PAEEK demonstrate much better away performance, with a 33% win rate, better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs the hosts' 10%), and higher possession (57% vs 49%). The visitors also have a solid away defense with 42% clean sheets and averaging only 1.17 goals conceded per match. Despite both teams' average recent form (1.4 PPG for the hosts, 1.0 PPG for the visitors), the overall season statistics clearly favor PAEEK, making an away win the most likely outcome.
MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MEAP Nisou played against PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on March 18, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
MEAP Nisou has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. PAEEK has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
MEAP Nisou scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.67. PAEEK scores 1.42 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of MEAP Nisou's games and 46% of PAEEK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 46%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MEAP Nisou has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.39 per game. MEAP Nisou takes 8.3 shots per game, while PAEEK takes 7.8.
First-half and second-half trends
MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. PAEEK leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
MEAP Nisou's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For PAEEK, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PAEEK appear to be the favorites for this match, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to MEAP Nisou's 7th position. The hosts are in very poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a negative goal difference of -13, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per game. PAEEK demonstrate much better away performance, with a 33% win rate, better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs the hosts' 10%), and higher possession (57% vs 49%). The visitors also have a solid away defense with 42% clean sheets and averaging only 1.17 goals conceded per match. Despite both teams' average recent form (1.4 PPG for the hosts, 1.0 PPG for the visitors), the overall season statistics clearly favor PAEEK, making an away win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MEAP Nisou | PAEEK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
MEAP Nisou is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 1 pts / game - PAEEK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PAEEK is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.42 goals / game - PAEEK
PAEEK is 90% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 0.88 goals / game - PAEEK
MEAP Nisou scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 meczów), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 meczów).
PAEEK scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
Over / Under - PAEEK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PAEEK is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.38 pts / game - PAEEK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
PAEEK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MEAP Nisou
PAEEK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| MEAP Nisou | Liga | PAEEK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.75 | 2.61 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 47% | • 46% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PAEEKGoalThemistoklis Themistokleous
- PAEEKGoalIoannis Avramidis
Head-to-head
Record from MEAP Nisou's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against PAEEK. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?
The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 1:2 PAEEK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and PAEEK?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 0, PAEEK won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?
MEAP Nisou score 1.08 goals per game on average and PAEEK 1.42. The Second Division average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 46% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 46% of PAEEK's.
What form are MEAP Nisou and PAEEK in?
Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and PAEEK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.