Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: match statistics

MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
1 : 2half-time 1:1
PAEEK crest
PAEEK
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

PAEEK appear to be the favorites for this match, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to MEAP Nisou's 7th position. The hosts are in very poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a negative goal difference of -13, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per game. PAEEK demonstrate much better away performance, with a 33% win rate, better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs the hosts' 10%), and higher possession (57% vs 49%). The visitors also have a solid away defense with 42% clean sheets and averaging only 1.17 goals conceded per match. Despite both teams' average recent form (1.4 PPG for the hosts, 1.0 PPG for the visitors), the overall season statistics clearly favor PAEEK, making an away win the most likely outcome.

MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MEAP Nisou play PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 18 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. PAEEK: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. PAEEK scores 1.45 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MEAP Nisou 48%, PAEEK 48%. Over 2.5: MEAP Nisou 48%, PAEEK 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.40. MEAP Nisou: 7.5 shots per match, PAEEK: 6.7.

Match halves

MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45. PAEEK: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). PAEEK: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

PAEEK appear to be the favorites for this match, occupying 2nd place in the table compared to MEAP Nisou's 7th position. The hosts are in very poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a negative goal difference of -13, conceding an average of 2.08 goals per game. PAEEK demonstrate much better away performance, with a 33% win rate, better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs the hosts' 10%), and higher possession (57% vs 49%). The visitors also have a solid away defense with 42% clean sheets and averaging only 1.17 goals conceded per match. Despite both teams' average recent form (1.4 PPG for the hosts, 1.0 PPG for the visitors), the overall season statistics clearly favor PAEEK, making an away win the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MEAP NisouPAEEK
-1Shots-1
MEAP NisouPAEEK
-1Shots on target-1
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0xG0
MEAP NisouPAEEK
2Corners5
MEAP NisouPAEEK
34Dangerous attacks55
MEAP NisouPAEEK
-1Fouls-1
MEAP NisouPAEEK
-1Cards-1
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match1.45
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.72Goals conceded / match1.07
MEAP NisouPAEEK
40%Average possession39%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
2.9Shots on target / match3.17
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.55Shots per match6.72
MEAP NisouPAEEK
2.9Shots on target3.17
MEAP NisouPAEEK
14.2%Shot conversion21.5%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
40%Possession39%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.42xG for1.4
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.48xG against1.25
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Shooting quality

MEAP Nisou: Counter-attackingPAEEK: Counter-attacking
MEAP NisouPAEEK
Accuracy (shots on target)38%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PAEEK is 500% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.2 pts / match - PAEEK

MEAP Nisou
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W17% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-10
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
PAEEK
WDDLD
Season result split
41% W34% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PAEEK is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.45 goals / match - PAEEK

PAEEK is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.07 goals / match - PAEEK

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: mixed

MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).

PAEEK scoring profile: very strong

PAEEK scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

31Goals scored (season)42
MEAP NisouPAEEK
50Goals conceded (season)31
MEAP NisouPAEEK
2.79Average goals in match2.52
MEAP NisouPAEEK
5Goals scored (last 5)8
MEAP NisouPAEEK
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
MEAP NisouPAEEK

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal72%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
28%2 goals45%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
10%3 goals24%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
3%4 goals3%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal52%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
52%2 goals31%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
24%3 goals10%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
10%4 goals7%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time28%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
3%BTTS in both halves0%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
17%Scored in both halves21%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
60%BTTS - last 560%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PAEEK is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - MEAP Nisou · 1.38 pts / match - PAEEK

MEAP Nisou - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing
PAEEK - half-time state
28% leading55% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.38
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.86
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.48
MEAP NisouPAEEK
34%Clean sheet before half-time59%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
52%No goal before half-time48%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.31
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
MEAP NisouPAEEK
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
MEAP NisouPAEEK
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.03
MEAP NisouPAEEK
48%Clean sheet after half-time66%
MEAP NisouPAEEK
66%No goal after half-time59%
MEAP NisouPAEEK

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PAEEK - second-half results

28% W48% R24% P
40
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
PAEEK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
8
16
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
9
4
16-30
10
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MEAP NisouLigaPAEEK
Average goals in match 2.792.72 2.52
Both teams scored 48%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 48%
Clean sheets 24%30% 48%
Goal before half-time 83%72% 66%
Goal after half-time 69%77% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MEAP Nisou 0 - 0 - 2 PAEEK. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

PAEEK
2 : 1
MEAP Nisou
MEAP Nisou
0 : 2
PAEEK

FAQ

What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?

The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 1:2 PAEEK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MEAP Nisou and PAEEK?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MEAP Nisou won 0, PAEEK won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?

MEAP Nisou score 1.07 goals per game on average and PAEEK 1.45. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 48% of PAEEK's.

What form are MEAP Nisou and PAEEK in?

Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and PAEEK 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs PAEEK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.