Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Mebrat Hayl vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics

Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema

Mebrat Hayl vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mebrat Hayl play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mebrat Hayl 37%, Fasil Ketema 26%. Over 2.5: Mebrat Hayl 26%, Fasil Ketema 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.12. Mebrat Hayl: 7.0 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.2.

Match halves

Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw because both teams produce few goals and frequently share points: the hosts draw 47% of home matches, while Fasil draws 60% of away games. Mebrat Hayl averages 0.73 goals scored at home and concedes 0.40 per match with 60% clean sheets, whereas Fasil scores 0.67 away and concedes 0.53 with 67% clean sheets, indicating low scoring. In the last 5 matches Mebrat is 1-1-3 and earns 0.8 points per game, while Fasil is 2-1-2 with 1.4 points per game, so the visitors are marginally better in form. Creation stats are similar: xG 1.03 for the hosts and 1.16 for the visitors, and average shots 6.71 vs 7.36 with conversion rates 12% vs 9%, suggesting a balance between chance quality and finishing. Key advantages are the hosts’ better defense and conversion (0.40 goals conceded per game and 12% conversion) versus the visitors’ higher xG and superior points per game (1.16 xG and 1.4 points per game); therefore I tip a share of the points.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
8Shots9
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
5Shots on target1
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
1.41xG1.36
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
2Corners6
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
76Dangerous attacks98
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
15Fouls10
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0Cards0
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.84Goals scored / match0.74
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.68Goals conceded / match0.74
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
53%Average possession46%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
2.21Shots on target / match2.24
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match7.24
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
2.21Shots on target2.24
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
12%Shot conversion10.2%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
53%Possession46%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
1.12xG for1.14
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
1.16xG against1.1
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Mebrat Hayl: BalancedFasil Ketema: Balanced
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)32%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-10-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mebrat Hayl is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Mebrat Hayl is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

32Goals scored (season)28
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
26Goals conceded (season)28
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
1.53Average goals in match1.47
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal58%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
18%2 goals11%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
8%3 goals5%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
3%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal45%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
16%2 goals21%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0%3 goals8%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time8%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
11%Scored in both halves8%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
60%BTTS - last 50%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time34%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.42
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.55Average goals (1st half)0.45
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
82%Clean sheet before half-time87%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
74%No goal before half-time71%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
0.97Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
61%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema
61%No goal after half-time63%
Mebrat HaylFasil Ketema

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mebrat HaylLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 1.531.78 1.47
Both teams scored 37%40% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%28% 18%
Clean sheets 47%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 39%56% 34%
Goal after half-time 63%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mebrat Hayl 0 - 0 - 1 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mebrat Hayl vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mebrat Hayl 3:1 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mebrat Hayl vs Fasil Ketema?

Mebrat Hayl score 0.84 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mebrat Hayl's matches and 26% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Mebrat Hayl and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Mebrat Hayl have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mebrat Hayl vs Fasil Ketema?

The statistical background for Mebrat Hayl vs Fasil Ketema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.