Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueAddis Ababa StadiumData current as of 16 July 2026

Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelle Kenema: match statistics

Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Mekelle Kenema crest
Mekelle Kenema

Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelle Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mebrat Hayl play Mekelle Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 16 June 2026 at 12:00. Venue: Addis Ababa Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Mekelle Kenema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Mekelle Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 0.95. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mebrat Hayl 37%, Mekelle Kenema 37%. Over 2.5: Mebrat Hayl 26%, Mekelle Kenema 34%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mebrat Hayl has higher xG: 1.12 vs 1.10. Mebrat Hayl: 7.0 shots per match, Mekelle Kenema: 6.4.

Match halves

Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50. Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). Mekelle Kenema: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Mebrat Hayl sits 6th in the table while Mekelle Kenema are 18th; the hosts have 11 wins this season versus the visitors’ 7, giving Mebrat a clear seasonal advantage. In terms of goals scored the teams are similar (Mebrat 28, Mekelle 27), but in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 6 goals while the visitors only 2, and Mekelle have failed to score in 59% of away games, indicating weaker offensive form. A strong case for Mebrat is their home defence — they concede only 0.47 goals per home match on average and keep 53% clean sheets, whereas Mekelle concede 0.76 on the road and have 47% clean sheets. Chance quality measured by xG is practically equal (home xG for Mebrat 1.05 vs away xG for Mekelle 1.04), but the hosts are more efficient (conversion 14% vs 11%) and register slightly more on-target shots 2.25 vs 2.12. Although over the last 5 matches Mebrat average 0.8 points per game versus the visitors’ 1.0, the table advantage, better win record (11 vs 7), superior defence and higher efficiency favor the home side; I give them a 55% chance to win, 30% for a draw and 15% for Mekelle.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
6Shots10
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0Shots on target1
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
1.01xG1.4
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
3Corners7
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
86Dangerous attacks96
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
13Fouls11
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0Cards0
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.84Goals scored / match0.79
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.68Goals conceded / match0.95
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
53%Average possession49%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
2.21Shots on target / match2.42
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match6.37
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
2.21Shots on target2.42
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
12%Shot conversion12.4%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
53%Possession49%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
1.12xG for1.1
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
1.16xG against1.17
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

Shooting quality

Mebrat Hayl: BalancedMekelle Kenema: Balanced
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.2 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema

Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-10-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Mekelle Kenema
DDDLW
Season result split
21% W45% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-17-13
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mebrat Hayl is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.79 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema

Mebrat Hayl is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.95 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Mekelle Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

32Goals scored (season)30
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
26Goals conceded (season)36
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
1.53Average goals in match1.74
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal53%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
18%2 goals21%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
8%3 goals5%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
3%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal61%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
16%2 goals26%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0%3 goals8%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time11%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
11%Scored in both halves16%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
60%BTTS - last 50%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mebrat Hayl is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.16 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema

Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing
Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.16
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.37
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.55Average goals (1st half)0.76
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
82%Clean sheet before half-time66%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
74%No goal before half-time68%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
61%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema
61%No goal after half-time63%
Mebrat HaylMekelle Kenema

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
44
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mekelle Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mebrat HaylLigaMekelle Kenema
Average goals in match 1.531.78 1.74
Both teams scored 37%40% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%28% 34%
Clean sheets 47%40% 39%
Goal before half-time 39%56% 55%
Goal after half-time 63%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mebrat Hayl 0 - 0 - 1 Mekelle Kenema. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelle Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mebrat Hayl 0:0 Mekelle Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelle Kenema?

Mebrat Hayl score 0.84 goals per game on average and Mekelle Kenema 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mebrat Hayl's matches and 37% of Mekelle Kenema's.

What form are Mebrat Hayl and Mekelle Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Mebrat Hayl have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mekelle Kenema 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelle Kenema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.