Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea: match statistics
Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Medeama played against Berekum Chelsea in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on December 7, 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Medeama has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Berekum Chelsea has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Medeama scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 0.67. Berekum Chelsea scores 0.67 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 1.92 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Medeama's games and 33% of Berekum Chelsea's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 25%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Medeama has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 0.82 per game. Medeama takes 14.5 shots per game, while Berekum Chelsea takes 1.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Medeama leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Berekum Chelsea leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Medeama's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Berekum Chelsea, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 1.92 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Medeama | Berekum Chelsea | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 4% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.45 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 8.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Medeama is 112% better for: goals scored per game.
1.42 goals / game - Medeama · 0.67 goals / game - Berekum Chelsea
Medeama is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - Medeama · 1.17 goals / game - Berekum Chelsea
Medeama scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
Berekum Chelsea scores in 50% of games (6 of 12 meczów), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Medeama
Over / Under - Berekum Chelsea
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Medeama is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / game - Medeama · 1.25 pts / game - Berekum Chelsea
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Medeama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Berekum Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Medeama
Berekum Chelsea
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Medeama | Liga | Berekum Chelsea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.08 | 1.92 | • 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 42% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 40% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 61% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Berekum ChelseaYellow cardKofi Patric Ansu
FAQ
What was the result of Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 2:1 Berekum Chelsea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea?
Medeama score 1.42 goals per game on average and Berekum Chelsea 0.67. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Medeama's matches and 33% of Berekum Chelsea's.
What form are Medeama and Berekum Chelsea in?
Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Berekum Chelsea 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea?
The statistical background for Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.