Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea: match statistics
Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Medeama play Berekum Chelsea in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 7 December 2025 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Berekum Chelsea: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Berekum Chelsea scores 1.03 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Medeama 53%, Berekum Chelsea 38%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Berekum Chelsea 32%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.15. Medeama: 9.5 shots per match, Berekum Chelsea: 2.7.
Match halves
Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76. Berekum Chelsea: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Berekum Chelsea: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Medeama | Berekum Chelsea | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.42 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 1.51 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Berekum Chelsea is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Medeama · 3 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Medeama is 49% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 1.03 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea
Medeama is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 0.97 goals / match - Berekum Chelsea
Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Berekum Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
Berekum Chelsea scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Medeama
Over / Under — Berekum Chelsea
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Medeama is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.47 pts / match - Berekum Chelsea
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Medeama - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Berekum Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Medeama
Berekum Chelsea
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Medeama | Liga | Berekum Chelsea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.35 | 2.03 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 34% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 34% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 62% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Medeama 0 - 0 - 1 Berekum Chelsea. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 2:1 Berekum Chelsea. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea?
Medeama score 1.53 goals per game on average and Berekum Chelsea 1.03. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Medeama's matches and 38% of Berekum Chelsea's.
What form are Medeama and Berekum Chelsea in?
Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Berekum Chelsea 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea?
The statistical background for Medeama vs Berekum Chelsea — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.