Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Medeama vs Karela: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
3 : 1half-time 2:1
Karela crest
Karela
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Medeama presents impressive form as the table leader with a 70% win rate at home and only one defeat in the entire season. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding only 2. Karela, conversely, has not won any away match this season (0% away win rate) and finds itself in dismal form, losing 3 of the last 5 fixtures. Medeama's advantage is visible in all aspects: averaging 1.7 goals per match at home versus 0.7 goals for Karela away, significantly higher xG (2.01 vs 0.87), and dominance in possession (59% vs 42%). The goal difference of both teams (+12 for Medeama at home, -8 for Karela away) further confirms the decisive advantage of the hosts, who should comfortably win this encounter.

Medeama vs Karela: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Medeama played against Karela in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on January 25, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Medeama has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Karela has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Medeama scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 0.58. Karela scores 1.00 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 1.86 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 47% of Medeama's games and 47% of Karela's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 26%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 29% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Medeama has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.01 per game. Medeama takes 14.4 shots per game, while Karela takes 6.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Medeama leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Karela leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.37 after halftime.

When the teams score

Medeama's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Karela, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ghana Premier League games average 1.86 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 29% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Medeama presents impressive form as the table leader with a 70% win rate at home and only one defeat in the entire season. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding only 2. Karela, conversely, has not won any away match this season (0% away win rate) and finds itself in dismal form, losing 3 of the last 5 fixtures. Medeama's advantage is visible in all aspects: averaging 1.7 goals per match at home versus 0.7 goals for Karela away, significantly higher xG (2.01 vs 0.87), and dominance in possession (59% vs 42%). The goal difference of both teams (+12 for Medeama at home, -8 for Karela away) further confirms the decisive advantage of the hosts, who should comfortably win this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
MedeamaKarela
-1Shots-1
MedeamaKarela
-1Shots on target-1
MedeamaKarela
0xG0
MedeamaKarela
-1Corners-1
MedeamaKarela
0Dangerous attacks0
MedeamaKarela
-1Fouls-1
MedeamaKarela
-1Cards-1
MedeamaKarela

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.42Goals scored / game1
MedeamaKarela
0.58Goals allowed / game1.05
MedeamaKarela
57%Average possession36%
MedeamaKarela
5.37Shots on target / game1.74
MedeamaKarela

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.37Shots per game6.47
MedeamaKarela
5.37Shots on target1.74
MedeamaKarela
9.9%Shot conversion15.4%
MedeamaKarela
57%Possession36%
MedeamaKarela
1.6xG for1.01
MedeamaKarela
1.12xG against1.09
MedeamaKarela

Shooting quality

Medeama: DominantKarela: Counter-attacking
MedeamaKarela
Accuracy (shots on target)37%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.57

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Medeama is 160% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Medeama · 1 pts / game - Karela

Medeama
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
58% W37% R5% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-1
2.11 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Karela
WDDLL
Season result split
32% W37% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-6
1.32 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 42% better for: goals scored per game.

1.42 goals / game - Medeama · 1 goals / game - Karela

Medeama is 81% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.58 goals / game - Medeama · 1.05 goals / game - Karela

Medeama scoring profile: strong

Medeama scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 meczów), while Karela keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 meczów).

Karela scoring profile: strong

Karela scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 meczów).

27Goals scored (season)19
MedeamaKarela
11Goals conceded (season)20
MedeamaKarela
2Average goals per game2.05
MedeamaKarela
7Goals scored (last 5)3
MedeamaKarela
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
MedeamaKarela

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal74%
MedeamaKarela
47%2 goals21%
MedeamaKarela
11%3 goals5%
MedeamaKarela
5%4 goals0%
MedeamaKarela

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal58%
MedeamaKarela
5%2 goals26%
MedeamaKarela
0%3 goals11%
MedeamaKarela
0%4 goals11%
MedeamaKarela

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time21%
MedeamaKarela
0%BTTS in both halves5%
MedeamaKarela
32%Scored in both halves11%
MedeamaKarela

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
MedeamaKarela
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MedeamaKarela
20%BTTS - last 540%
MedeamaKarela

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
MedeamaKarela
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
MedeamaKarela
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
MedeamaKarela

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
MedeamaKarela
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
MedeamaKarela
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
MedeamaKarela

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama - half-time state
37% leading42% draw21% trailing
Karela - half-time state
32% leading53% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per game (1st half)1.47
MedeamaKarela
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.63
MedeamaKarela
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
MedeamaKarela
0.95Average goals (1st half)1.11
MedeamaKarela
68%Clean sheet before half-time68%
MedeamaKarela
53%No goal before half-time47%
MedeamaKarela

After half-time (2nd half)

1.95Points per game (2nd half)0.89
MedeamaKarela
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
MedeamaKarela
0.26Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
MedeamaKarela
1.05Average goals (2nd half)0.95
MedeamaKarela
79%Clean sheet after half-time53%
MedeamaKarela
37%No goal after half-time68%
MedeamaKarela

Medeama - second-half results

53% W37% R11% P
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Karela - second-half results

11% W58% R32% P
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Medeama - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.0
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Karela - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.41.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
4
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
0
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Karela
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
1
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Karela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaKarela
Average goals per game 2.001.86 2.05
Both teams scored 47%33% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%29% 26%
Clean sheets 47%42% 42%
Goal before half-time 68%61% 63%
Goal after half-time 74%60% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.86
Average goals per game
33%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
0.60
Away goals / game
+110%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defensive advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MedeamaGoalDerrick Fordjour

Head-to-head

Record from Medeama's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Karela. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Karela
1 : 0
Medeama

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Karela?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 3:1 Karela. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Karela?

Medeama score 1.42 goals per game on average and Karela 1.00. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Medeama's matches and 47% of Karela's.

What form are Medeama and Karela in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Karela 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Karela?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.