Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Medeama vs Young Apostles: match statistics

Medeama crest
Medeama
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Young Apostles crest
Young Apostles
170%(1.22)
X20%(4.85)
210%(13.20)

Medeama holds a decided advantage as league leaders, boasting an impressive record of 9 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 defeat this season. The hosts exhibit excellent home form with a 67% win rate and concede an average of just 0.56 goals per home match. Young Apostles sit 16th in the table with very poor away form—only an 11% win rate on the road and failing to score in 67% of their matches. The disparity in offensive quality is stark: Medeama scores an average of 1.56 goals per home match with an xG of 2.07, while the visitors average just 0.33 goals on the road with an xG of 1.29. Recent form also favors the hosts—2.2 points per match in their last 5 games compared to just 0.8 points for the visitors. Considering all statistics, a decisive victory for Medeama is the most probable outcome.

Medeama vs Young Apostles: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Medeama play Young Apostles in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 11 January 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Young Apostles: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82 goals per match. Young Apostles scores 1.06 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Medeama 53%, Young Apostles 39%. Over 2.5: Medeama 47%, Young Apostles 36%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.38. Medeama: 9.5 shots per match, Young Apostles: 6.4.

Match halves

Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76. Young Apostles: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). Young Apostles: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Medeama holds a decided advantage as league leaders, boasting an impressive record of 9 wins, 7 draws, and only 1 defeat this season. The hosts exhibit excellent home form with a 67% win rate and concede an average of just 0.56 goals per home match. Young Apostles sit 16th in the table with very poor away form—only an 11% win rate on the road and failing to score in 67% of their matches. The disparity in offensive quality is stark: Medeama scores an average of 1.56 goals per home match with an xG of 2.07, while the visitors average just 0.33 goals on the road with an xG of 1.29. Recent form also favors the hosts—2.2 points per match in their last 5 games compared to just 0.8 points for the visitors. Considering all statistics, a decisive victory for Medeama is the most probable outcome.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
MedeamaYoung Apostles
13Shots10
MedeamaYoung Apostles
4Shots on target1
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.49xG1.1
MedeamaYoung Apostles
7Corners2
MedeamaYoung Apostles
53Dangerous attacks55
MedeamaYoung Apostles
20Fouls21
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1Cards3
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.53Goals scored / match1.06
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.82Goals conceded / match1.09
MedeamaYoung Apostles
45%Average possession28%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3.59Shots on target / match1.88
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match6.36
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3.59Shots on target1.88
MedeamaYoung Apostles
16.1%Shot conversion16.7%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
45%Possession28%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.43xG for1.38
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.07xG against1.25
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Shooting quality

Medeama: Counter-attackingYoung Apostles: Counter-attacking
MedeamaYoung Apostles
Accuracy (shots on target)38%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.56

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Young Apostles
LWWLW
Season result split
33% W27% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-13
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Medeama · 1.06 goals / match - Young Apostles

Medeama is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.82 goals / match - Medeama · 1.09 goals / match - Young Apostles

Medeama scoring profile: very strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Young Apostles keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

Young Apostles scoring profile: mixed

Young Apostles scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

52Goals scored (season)35
MedeamaYoung Apostles
28Goals conceded (season)36
MedeamaYoung Apostles
2.35Average goals in match2.15
MedeamaYoung Apostles
11Goals scored (last 5)8
MedeamaYoung Apostles
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
MedeamaYoung Apostles

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal61%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
44%2 goals30%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
15%3 goals15%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
9%4 goals0%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal70%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
21%2 goals33%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3%3 goals6%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3%4 goals0%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
3%BTTS in both halves3%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
26%Scored in both halves27%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
60%BTTS - last 560%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Medeama · 1.21 pts / match - Young Apostles

Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing
Young Apostles - half-time state
27% leading39% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.21
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.52
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.03
MedeamaYoung Apostles
65%Clean sheet before half-time58%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
50%No goal before half-time61%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per match (2nd half)1.21
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
MedeamaYoung Apostles
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
MedeamaYoung Apostles
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.12
MedeamaYoung Apostles
68%Clean sheet after half-time55%
MedeamaYoung Apostles
41%No goal after half-time52%
MedeamaYoung Apostles

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Young Apostles - second-half results

24% W48% R27% P
40
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Young Apostles - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Young Apostles
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
8
16-30
9
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
8
5
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Young Apostles

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

MedeamaLigaYoung Apostles
Average goals in match 2.352.03 2.15
Both teams scored 53%34% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%34% 36%
Clean sheets 44%41% 30%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 70%
Goal after half-time 71%59% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Medeama 1 - 0 - 0 Young Apostles. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Young Apostles
0 : 2
Medeama

FAQ

What was the result of Medeama vs Young Apostles?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Medeama 3:0 Young Apostles. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Medeama vs Young Apostles?

Medeama score 1.53 goals per game on average and Young Apostles 1.06. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Medeama's matches and 39% of Young Apostles's.

What form are Medeama and Young Apostles in?

Over the last 5 games Medeama have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Young Apostles 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Medeama vs Young Apostles?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Medeama vs Young Apostles: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.