Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueTigray StadiumData current as of September 07, 2026

Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar: match statistics

Mekelle Kenema crest
Mekelle Kenema
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Bahardar crest
Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mekelle Kenema played against Bahardar in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The game was played on May 30, 2026. Venue: Tigray Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Mekelle Kenema has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Bahardar has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Mekelle Kenema scores 0.82 goals per game and allows 1.00. Bahardar scores 0.79 and allows 0.70. Games in this league average 1.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Mekelle Kenema's games and 33% of Bahardar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 18%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Bahardar has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 1.10 per game. Mekelle Kenema takes 6.0 shots per game, while Bahardar takes 7.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Mekelle Kenema leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. Bahardar leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mekelle Kenema's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Bahardar, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ethiopia Premier League games average 1.79 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X) as the most likely outcome due to the high draw rates for both teams: Mekelle Kenema has 50% draws at home, and Bahardar has 50% draws away. Bahardar is notably stronger defensively on the road — they concede on average 0.63 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in 56% of games, whereas Mekelle concedes 1.25 goals at home and has only a 19% clean sheet rate. Offensively, the hosts are marginally more efficient at home (avg. 3 shots on target, 16% conversion rate, avg. 1.00 goal and xG 1.17), while the visitors score on average 0.81 goals away with xG 1.13, indicating similar attacking potential. Form favors the visitors — Mekelle’s last 5: 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses (avg. 1.0 pt/match), while Bahardar are unbeaten in their last 5 (2 wins, 3 draws, avg. 1.8 pts/match). Therefore I expect a low-scoring draw or a narrow away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long metrics indicate a low BTTS rate: both teams scored in 35% of Mekelle Kenema’s matches and 31% of Bahardar’s matches, both below the league average of 41%. Both sides keep clean sheets frequently — 53% for Mekelle and 56% for Bahardar — increasing the likelihood that at least one team will keep a clean sheet. Offensively they average only 0.76 and 0.81 goals per game, and despite xG of 1.30 for Mekelle and 1.13 for Bahardar, the home side converts just 0.76 (a 0.54 gap) and the visitors 0.81 (a 0.32 gap), indicating poor conversion of created chances. In the last 5 matches Bahardar have scored 6 and conceded 2 (1.2 and 0.4 per game), while Mekelle have 3 and 5 (0.6 and 1.0), so recent form and defensive figures favor a single-team scoring outcome or one clean sheet. Given the low seasonal BTTS 35%/31%, high clean sheets 53%/56% and a league average goals of 1.79, I recommend a "No" (BTTS - No) with an estimated probability of about 70%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Mekelle Kenema scores on average 0.76 goals per match, Bahardar 0.81; however xG is 1.30 for Mekelle and 1.13 for Bahardar, indicating higher offensive potential (combined xG ≈ 2.43). Comparing the home attack (xG 1.30) to the away defense (xG against 1.11) yields about 1.21 expected goals for Mekelle, while the away attack (1.13) versus the home defense (1.26) gives about 1.20 for Bahardar, total ≈2.41. Season shares of matches over 1.5 goals are 53% (Mekelle) and 56% (Bahardar) — average ≈54.5% — whereas over 2.5 is only 24% and 13%, and over 3.5 is 18% and 6%. Additionally, both teams have a high clean sheet rate: 53% and 56%, and a low frequency of BTTS: 35% and 31%, which reduces the likelihood of multiple goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (forecast Over 1.5 ≈61%), while Over 2.5 (~18%) and Over 3.5 (~8%) look unlikely; therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time: Mekelle and Bahardar record a half-time draw in 71% and 75% of matches respectively (≈73% on average), and the average number of first-half goals is only 0.29 for the home side and 0.19 for the visitors (≈0.48 total), which increases the likelihood of a 0–0 at the break. A draw at full-time is also common — the season draw rates are 59% for Mekelle and 50% for Bahardar (≈54.5% on average), with a low share of matches where both teams scored: 35% and 31%. At the same time Bahardar shows a clear advantage in second halves: the visitors average 1.06 goals after the break versus 0.71 for the home team, and 63% of the visitors’ matches feature at least one goal in the second half (vs 35% for Mekelle), which increases the chance of a turnaround after the break in favor of the visitors. xG presents a balanced picture (1.30 xG for Mekelle vs 1.13 xG for Bahardar), but actual goal averages are low (0.76 and 0.81), so the most moderate and stable pick is X/X (draw at Half-Time and draw at Full-Time). On this basis I recommend X/X as the most likely scenario, while also acknowledging smaller chances for X/2 (~14%) and 2/2 (~9%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
13Shots11
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
2Shots on target3
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.37xG1.22
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3Corners2
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
58Dangerous attacks44
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
21Fouls17
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0Cards0
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.82Goals scored / game0.79
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1Goals allowed / game0.7
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
49%Average possession51%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
2.55Shots on target / game2.52
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.03Shots per game7.82
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
2.55Shots on target2.52
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
13.6%Shot conversion10.1%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
49%Possession51%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.1xG for1.22
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.17xG against1.18
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Shooting quality

Mekelle Kenema: Efficient finishingBahardar: Balanced
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
Accuracy (shots on target)42%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Bahardar is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Mekelle Kenema · 1.8 pts / game - Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema
DLLDW
Season result split
21% W42% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-12
1.06 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Bahardar
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
27% W55% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-18-6
1.36 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bahardar is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Mekelle Kenema · 0.7 goals / game - Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Mekelle Kenema scores in 58% of games (19 of 33 meczów), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 55% (18 of 33 meczów).

Bahardar scoring profile: mixed

Bahardar scores in 52% of games (17 of 33 meczów), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (11 of 33 meczów).

27Goals scored (season)26
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
33Goals conceded (season)23
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.82Average goals per game1.48
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal52%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
21%2 goals24%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3%3 goals3%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal45%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
27%2 goals18%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
6%3 goals6%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
15%Scored in both halves9%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
40%BTTS - last 540%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time36%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time48%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelle Kenema is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / game - Mekelle Kenema · 1.09 pts / game - Bahardar

Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
21% leading52% draw27% trailing
Bahardar - half-time state
12% leading73% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per game (1st half)1.09
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.61
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
64%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
67%No goal before half-time76%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per game (2nd half)1.42
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.88
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
55%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar
61%No goal after half-time64%
Mekelle KenemaBahardar

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R27% P
38
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Bahardar - second-half results

27% W61% R12% P
36
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Mekelle Kenema - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.21.4
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Bahardar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
8
6
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
5
5
31-45
8
2
46-60
5
4
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.66
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mekelle KenemaLigaBahardar
Average goals per game 1.821.79 1.48
Both teams scored 42%41% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%28% 18%
Clean sheets 33%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 58%54% 36%
Goal after half-time 64%60% 48%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per game
41%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / game
0.89
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Mekelle Kenema's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Bahardar. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelle Kenema 0:0 Bahardar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?

Mekelle Kenema score 0.82 goals per game on average and Bahardar 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Mekelle Kenema's matches and 33% of Bahardar's.

What form are Mekelle Kenema and Bahardar in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelle Kenema have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bahardar 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar?

The statistical background for Mekelle Kenema vs Bahardar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.