Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Mekelle Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: match statistics

130%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match heavily favoring a draw scenario. Mekelle Kenema exhibits a very high draw percentage in home games (67%), a trend confirmed by their form across the last 5 matches at their own stadium. Shire Endaselassie also frequently shares points on the road (44% draws) and fails to score in 56% of away fixtures. Both teams hold an identical points record over the last 5 matches (1.2 PPG), confirming an even level of form. Although the hosts hold a slight advantage in xG (1.35 vs 0.97) and average home goals scored (1.22 vs 0.78 for the visitors away), the visitors' defense is more solid (0.78 goals conceded away vs 1.44 for the hosts at home). Considering both teams' propensity for draws and the balanced level of play, a share of the points is the most probable outcome.

Mekelle Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mekelle Kenema play Shire Endaselassie in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 23 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Mekelle Kenema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Shire Endaselassie: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mekelle Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Shire Endaselassie scores 0.65 and concedes 0.86. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mekelle Kenema 37%, Shire Endaselassie 27%. Over 2.5: Mekelle Kenema 34%, Shire Endaselassie 19%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelle Kenema has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.95. Mekelle Kenema: 6.4 shots per match, Shire Endaselassie: 5.3.

Match halves

Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.42. Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Mekelle Kenema: 46-60 (9 goals). Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match heavily favoring a draw scenario. Mekelle Kenema exhibits a very high draw percentage in home games (67%), a trend confirmed by their form across the last 5 matches at their own stadium. Shire Endaselassie also frequently shares points on the road (44% draws) and fails to score in 56% of away fixtures. Both teams hold an identical points record over the last 5 matches (1.2 PPG), confirming an even level of form. Although the hosts hold a slight advantage in xG (1.35 vs 0.97) and average home goals scored (1.22 vs 0.78 for the visitors away), the visitors' defense is more solid (0.78 goals conceded away vs 1.44 for the hosts at home). Considering both teams' propensity for draws and the balanced level of play, a share of the points is the most probable outcome.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
4Shots11
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
2Shots on target5
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.85xG1.66
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
3Corners5
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
62Dangerous attacks85
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
-1Fouls-1
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
-1Cards-1
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.79Goals scored / match0.65
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.95Goals conceded / match0.86
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
49%Average possession45%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
2.42Shots on target / match2.14
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.37Shots per match5.27
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
2.42Shots on target2.14
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
12.4%Shot conversion12.3%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
49%Possession45%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.1xG for0.95
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.17xG against1.24
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

Shooting quality

Mekelle Kenema: BalancedShire Endaselassie: Counter-attacking
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
Accuracy (shots on target)38%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mekelle Kenema is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Mekelle Kenema
DDDLW
Season result split
21% W45% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-17-13
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-10-5
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
Shire Endaselassie
DDLWL
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-8-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelle Kenema is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema · 0.65 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Shire Endaselassie is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema · 0.86 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Mekelle Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 41% (15 of 37 matches).

Shire Endaselassie scoring profile: mixed

Shire Endaselassie scores in 46% of matches (17 of 37 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

30Goals scored (season)24
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
36Goals conceded (season)32
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.74Average goals in match1.51
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal46%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
21%2 goals14%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
5%3 goals5%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%4 goals0%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal59%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
26%2 goals19%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
8%3 goals5%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%4 goals3%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

27%
Shire Endaselassie - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 37 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
16%Scored in both halves11%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%BTTS - last 520%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time51%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time51%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shire Endaselassie is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema · 1.27 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing
Shire Endaselassie - half-time state
24% leading54% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.27
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.76Average goals (1st half)0.73
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
66%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
68%No goal before half-time68%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.51
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.78
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
58%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie
63%No goal after half-time76%
Mekelle KenemaShire Endaselassie

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
44
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shire Endaselassie - second-half results

16% W57% R27% P
47
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelle Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shire Endaselassie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Shire Endaselassie
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Shire Endaselassie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mekelle KenemaLigaShire Endaselassie
Average goals in match 1.741.78 1.51
Both teams scored 37%40% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%28% 19%
Clean sheets 39%40% 41%
Goal before half-time 55%56% 51%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 51%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mekelle Kenema 0 - 0 - 1 Shire Endaselassie. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Shire Endaselassie
1 : 0
Mekelle Kenema

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelle Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelle Kenema 1:0 Shire Endaselassie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelle Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

Mekelle Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Shire Endaselassie 0.65. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mekelle Kenema's matches and 27% of Shire Endaselassie's.

What form are Mekelle Kenema and Shire Endaselassie in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelle Kenema have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Shire Endaselassie 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelle Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.