Romania - Liga IIData current as of October 22, 2026

Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Metaloglobus plays CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in Liga II (Romania). The game is scheduled for October 26, 2026.

Recent form

Metaloglobus has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Metaloglobus scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 1.50. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores 1.00 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Metaloglobus's games and 50% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Metaloglobus has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.24 per game. Metaloglobus takes 10.4 shots per game, while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea takes 9.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Metaloglobus leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Metaloglobus's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga II games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(2.13)
(3.15)
(3.26)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.1Goals scored / game1
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.5Goals allowed / game1.5
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
49%Average possession47%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
4.5Shots on target / game3.8
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.4Shots per game9.4
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
4.5Shots on target3.8
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10.6%Shot conversion10.6%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
49%Possession47%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.48xG for1.24
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.68xG against1.38
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Shooting quality

Metaloglobus: BalancedCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: Balanced
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Accuracy (shots on target)43%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Metaloglobus is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Metaloglobus · 0.6 pts / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Metaloglobus
LDWLD
Season result split
30% W30% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-4
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
LLWLL
Season result split
30% W20% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-5
1.10 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 away
2-0-2
WWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metaloglobus is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.1 goals / game - Metaloglobus · 1 goals / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Metaloglobus scoring profile: very strong

Metaloglobus scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 games), while CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 games).

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scoring profile: strong

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 games), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 games).

11Goals scored (season)10
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
15Goals conceded (season)15
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
2.6Average goals per game2.5
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
4Goals scored (last 5)4
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
30%2 goals30%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10%3 goals10%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%4 goals0%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal90%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
40%2 goals40%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
40%3 goals10%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0%4 goals10%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 10 games
54%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time20%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10%BTTS in both halves0%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
20%Scored in both halves10%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
40%BTTS - last 540%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / game - Metaloglobus · 1.3 pts / game - CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Metaloglobus - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per game (1st half)1.3
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.6
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1Average goals (1st half)1.3
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
40%Clean sheet before half-time60%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
70%No goal before half-time60%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per game (2nd half)0.9
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.2
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
50%Clean sheet after half-time30%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
40%No goal after half-time70%
MetaloglobusCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Metaloglobus - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - second-half results

30% W0% D70% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Metaloglobus - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Metaloglobus
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Metaloglobus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

MetaloglobusLigaCSM Râmnicu Vâlcea
Average goals per game▼ 2.602.92▼ 2.50
Both teams scored▲ 60%54%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%55%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 30%25%▼ 10%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%77%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%82%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Metaloglobus and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea play?

Metaloglobus face CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea on October 26, 2026 in Liga II. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

Metaloglobus score 1.10 goals per game on average and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1.00. The Liga II average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Metaloglobus's matches and 50% of CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea's.

What form are Metaloglobus and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea in?

Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metaloglobus vs CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.