Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners: match statistics
Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Metta - LU played against Beitar / Riga Mariners in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Beitar / Riga Mariners has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Metta - LU scores 4.24 goals per game and allows 0.81. Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.38 and allows 1.10. Games in this league average 3.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Metta - LU's games and 67% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's. The Over 2.5 rates are 86% and 71%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 2.98 to 1.81 per game. Metta - LU takes 19.8 shots per game, while Beitar / Riga Mariners takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Metta - LU leads at halftime in 71% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. Beitar / Riga Mariners leads at halftime in 57% and scores 1.19 after halftime.
When the teams score
Metta - LU's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (22 goals). For Beitar / Riga Mariners, it is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.72 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta - LU are top of the table and have won 90% of their home matches, although Beitar / Riga Mariners have also performed well away, winning 73% of their games. The hosts hold a clear attacking edge: at home, they average 5.8 goals and create chances worth 3.45 xG, while the visitors average 2.36 goals and 1.79 xG away from home. Metta also averages 16 shots on target per home match, compared with the visitors' 6.82 away, pointing to more chances for the hosts. Metta's defense allows just 0.62 xG per home match, whereas the visitors concede 1.39 xG away. Both teams have won 4 of their last 5 matches, but Metta scored 20 goals and conceded 3 in that span, compared with the visitors' record of 16 scored and 8 conceded. The home win is therefore the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams scored in 70% of Metta’s matches and 64% of Beitar’s, and neither side has yet finished a match without scoring. Their attacking averages are similar: the hosts score 2.4 goals per match with an xG of 1.84, while the visitors average 2.36 goals with an xG of 1.79. Recent form also supports BTTS - Yes: Metta scored 20 goals in 5 matches, while Beitar scored 16 and conceded an average of 1.6 goals. The hosts’ defense remains a risk factor for this selection, having conceded only 3 goals over that period. The case for both teams to score is therefore clear, but not overwhelming.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Metta average 2.4 goals per match, while Beitar / Riga Mariners average 2.36; over their last five games, those averages have risen to 4.0 and 3.2, respectively. The quality of chances also points to goals: season xG stands at 1.84 for the hosts and 1.79 for the visitors, and both teams have scored in every match they have played so far. Over 1.5 goals has landed in 90% of Metta’s matches and 91% of the visitors’ matches, making it better supported by the data than Over 2.5 goals, which has landed in 60% and 82% of their games, respectively. Although their recent scoring form suggests the potential for a high-scoring game, the hosts concede an average of just 1.0 goal, so Over 1.5 goals is a safer pick than the higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Metta-LU leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes, although the edge is not clear-cut. The hosts have led at half-time in 56% of their matches so far and have not been trailing at the break in any of their last five; however, the visitors have led after the first half in 64% of their matches, so their strong start remains a genuine threat. Metta’s second-half performance supports the likelihood of them holding on to a favorable result: they have won the second half in 78% of matches, compared with 45% for their opponents. In their last five games, the hosts have scored an average of 4.0 goals and conceded 0.6, while the visitors have scored 3.2 and conceded 1.6, further supporting a Metta win at full-time. A draw at half-time followed by a home win is also possible, as Metta were level at the break in three of their last five matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Metta - LU | Beitar / Riga Mariners | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 8% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU · 2.4 pts / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 78% better for: goals scored per game.
4.24 goals / game - Metta - LU · 2.38 goals / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners
Metta - LU is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.81 goals / game - Metta - LU · 1.1 goals / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (21 of 21 games), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 games).
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of games (21 of 21 games), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metta - LU
Over / Under - Beitar / Riga Mariners
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.38 pts / game - Metta - LU · 1.9 pts / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 71% of games and wins 81%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +13 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (22 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Metta - LU
Beitar / Riga Mariners
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Metta - LU | Liga | Beitar / Riga Mariners | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 5.05 | 3.72 | ▼ 3.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 70% | • 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 20% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Metta - LUAssistSuleiman Abdulraheem
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Metta - LU's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Beitar / Riga Mariners. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners?
The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 4:0 Beitar / Riga Mariners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners?
Metta - LU score 4.24 goals per game on average and Beitar / Riga Mariners 2.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Metta - LU's matches and 67% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's.
What form are Metta - LU and Beitar / Riga Mariners in?
Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Beitar / Riga Mariners 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Beitar / Riga Mariners: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


