Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 22 July 2026

Metta - LU vs Skanste: match statistics

Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Skanste crest
Skanste

Metta - LU vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Metta - LU play Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Skanste: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Metta - LU scores 3.54 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Skanste scores 1.54 and concedes 2.08. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Metta - LU 54%, Skanste 46%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 85%, Skanste 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.83 vs 1.44. Metta - LU: 20.1 shots per match, Skanste: 9.8.

Match halves

Metta - LU: half-time lead 85%, second-half goals 1.54. Skanste: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). Skanste: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Metta has a clear offensive and possession advantage: at home they score an average of 4.5 goals per game, take 27.33 shots of which 15.83 are on target and average 60% possession, while Skanste away average 2.2 goals with 11.75 shots and only 5 shots on target and 42% possession. The difference in quality of chances is confirmed by xG: Metta’s home xG is 3.4 versus Skanste’s away xG of 1.58, while xG against is 0.64 for the hosts and 2.14 for the visitors. Form also favours Metta – the hosts scored 23 goals in their last 5 matches and have a 4W-1D record (average 2.6 pts per game), whereas Skanste scored 9 goals in five matches with a 2-0-3 record and 1.2 pts per game. Metta is more clinical (conversion rate 16% vs 11% for Skanste), have no home matches without a goal (0%) and 50% of home games with a clean sheet; Skanste have no clean sheets away and failed to score in 40% of away matches. Considering superiority in shots, xG, efficiency and recent form, I predict a home win ('1') with approximately a 78% chance of victory, 12% for a draw and 10% for an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Metta - LUSkanste
3Shots1
Metta - LUSkanste
3Shots on target1
Metta - LUSkanste
1.16xG0.37
Metta - LUSkanste
10Corners3
Metta - LUSkanste
102Dangerous attacks31
Metta - LUSkanste
10Fouls7
Metta - LUSkanste
0Cards0
Metta - LUSkanste

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.54Goals scored / match1.54
Metta - LUSkanste
0.85Goals conceded / match2.08
Metta - LUSkanste
56%Average possession40%
Metta - LUSkanste
10.69Shots on target / match4.31
Metta - LUSkanste

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

20.15Shots per match9.85
Metta - LUSkanste
10.69Shots on target4.31
Metta - LUSkanste
17.6%Shot conversion15.6%
Metta - LUSkanste
56%Possession40%
Metta - LUSkanste
2.83xG for1.44
Metta - LUSkanste
0.73xG against1.73
Metta - LUSkanste

Shooting quality

Metta - LU: DominantSkanste: Counter-attacking
Metta - LUSkanste
Accuracy (shots on target)53%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU · 0.6 pts / match - Skanste

Metta - LU
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
85% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-1
2.62 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.52Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Skanste
LWLLL
Season result split
31% W8% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 130% better for: goals scored per match.

3.54 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.54 goals / match - Skanste

Metta - LU is 145% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Metta - LU · 2.08 goals / match - Skanste

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Skanste scoring profile: mixed

Skanste scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).

46Goals scored (season)20
Metta - LUSkanste
11Goals conceded (season)27
Metta - LUSkanste
4.38Average goals in match3.62
Metta - LUSkanste
19Goals scored (last 5)5
Metta - LUSkanste
7Goals conceded (last 5)13
Metta - LUSkanste

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal62%
Metta - LUSkanste
85%2 goals31%
Metta - LUSkanste
69%3 goals23%
Metta - LUSkanste
38%4 goals23%
Metta - LUSkanste

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal85%
Metta - LUSkanste
23%2 goals69%
Metta - LUSkanste
8%3 goals38%
Metta - LUSkanste
0%4 goals15%
Metta - LUSkanste

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
Metta - LUSkanste
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Metta - LUSkanste
77%Scored in both halves8%
Metta - LUSkanste

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Metta - LUSkanste
31%Min. 3 goals without BTTS31%
Metta - LUSkanste
80%BTTS - last 540%
Metta - LUSkanste

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Metta - LUSkanste
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Metta - LUSkanste
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Metta - LUSkanste

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Metta - LUSkanste
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
Metta - LUSkanste
46%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Metta - LUSkanste

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 398% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.69 pts / match - Metta - LU · 0.54 pts / match - Skanste

Metta - LU - half-time state
85% leading15% draw0% trailing
Skanste - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.69Points per match (1st half)0.54
Metta - LUSkanste
1.85Goals scored (1st half)0.15
Metta - LUSkanste
0.08Goals conceded (1st half)1
Metta - LUSkanste
1.92Average goals (1st half)1.15
Metta - LUSkanste
92%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Metta - LUSkanste
15%No goal before half-time85%
Metta - LUSkanste

After half-time (2nd half)

1.92Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Metta - LUSkanste
1.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Metta - LUSkanste
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Metta - LUSkanste
2.15Average goals (2nd half)1.92
Metta - LUSkanste
62%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Metta - LUSkanste
15%No goal after half-time54%
Metta - LUSkanste

Metta - LU - second-half results

54% W31% R15% P
35
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+23
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 85% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Skanste - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding388%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+9+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 9
Skanste - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
7
1
16-30
10
0
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
8
31-45
8
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
195%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Metta - LULigaSkanste
Average goals in match 4.383.43 3.62
Both teams scored 54%60% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%68% 69%
Clean sheets 46%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 85%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Metta - LU vs Skanste?

The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 3:1 Skanste. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Skanste?

Metta - LU score 3.54 goals per game on average and Skanste 1.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Metta - LU's matches and 46% of Skanste's.

What form are Metta - LU and Skanste in?

Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Skanste 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Skanste?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Skanste: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.