Latvia - 1. LigaHanzas vidusskolas laukumsData current as of September 06, 2026

Metta - LU vs Tukums II: match statistics

Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU
9 : 0half-time 6:0
Tukums II crest
Tukums II

Metta - LU vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Metta - LU played against Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on July 27, 2026. Venue: Hanzas vidusskolas laukums. Final score: 9:0.

Recent form

Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Tukums II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Metta - LU scores 3.54 goals per game and allows 0.85. Tukums II scores 1.38 and allows 2.38. Games in this league average 3.43 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Metta - LU's games and 77% of Tukums II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 85% and 69%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 2.83 to 1.57 per game. Metta - LU takes 20.1 shots per game, while Tukums II takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Metta - LU leads at halftime in 85% of its games and scores 1.54 goals per game after halftime. Tukums II leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.92 after halftime.

When the teams score

Metta - LU's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Tukums II, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.43 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1). Metta - LU holds a clear offensive advantage: 46 goals scored this season (18 in the last 5 matches) and at home averages 4.29 goals per game with 23.86 shots and 14 shots on target, whereas Tukums II has 18 goals this season and on the road averages 1.5 goals with 11 shots and 5 on target. The quality of created chances also favors Metta — home average xG is 3.08 versus 1.5 xG for the visitors away, and Metta concedes on average 1 goal at home with xG against 0.6, while Tukums concedes 3 goals away with xG against 2.02. Form and defensive stability are pronounced: Metta has won 5 of the last 5 matches and averages 3 points over that period, while Tukums has 1 win in the last 5, scored 5 and conceded 15, averaging 0.6 points per match; additionally Metta has 43% clean sheets at home, and Tukums 0% away. Considering the advantage in shots (23.86 vs 11), conversion rate (18% vs 9%), xG (3.08 vs 1.5) and recent run of results, I assign the home team an 85% chance, draw 10% and the away team 5%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis favors BTTS: Metta has a season BTTS rate of 71% and Tukums II 83%, versus a league average of 60%. Tukums II concedes an average of 3.0 goals per match this season (31 goals conceded) and has 0% clean sheets, and has conceded 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per match), which strongly increases the likelihood of conceding. Metta is in very good attacking form – 18 goals in the last 5 matches (3.6 per match) and 46 goals in the season with a season average of 1.29, so the home side regularly creates and converts chances. xG and shot metrics confirm this view: Metta xG 1.6 versus xG against Tukums II 2.02, shots on target 5.29 vs 5.0 and conversion 11% versus 9%, suggesting both sides generate quality opportunities. Considering the 71% and 83% BTTS rates, Tukums II’s 0% clean sheets and Metta’s 18 goals in the last 5 matches, I tip BTTS - Yes with an 80% probability versus 20% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of approximately 3.39 goals: Metta about 1.81 and Tukums II about 1.58, calculated as the average of attacking xG and xG against (1.6 vs 2.02 for the home side; 1.5 vs 1.66 for the away). In the last 5 matches Metta averaged 3.6 goals scored and 0.6 conceded (record 5 wins), while Tukums II averaged 1.0 scored and 3.0 conceded (last 5: 4 losses, 1 win), which increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring game. Both teams have a high percentage of BTTS matches: 71% for Metta and 83% for Tukums II, and both have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season, so the signal for Over 1.5 is very strong. Season percentages for Over 2.5 are 57% (Metta) and 83% (Tukums II), and the league average goals is 3.43, therefore I estimate a 78% chance for Over 2.5 and 63% for Over 3.5. The best line to play from a statistical standpoint is Over 1.5, since historically both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 and the predicted total is 3.39 goals; therefore I recommend Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back 1/1 as the most secure outcome because Metta - LU led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time in those fixtures, while Tukums II failed to score before the break in their last five (0.0). Full-match form strongly favors the hosts: Metta have won all 5 of their most recent games (100%), averaging 3.6 goals scored and 0.6 conceded in that span, whereas Tukums II average 1.0 scored and 3.0 conceded over their last five. xG and shot metrics corroborate Metta’s advantage — home xG 1.6 versus 1.5 for the visitors, xG against 1.66 versus 2.02, and an average of 5.29 shots on target versus 5.0 with higher shot conversion (11% vs 9%). Metta also score heavily after the break (on average 2.2 second-half goals in the last five), which reduces the risk of surrendering a half-time lead; therefore the scenario of leading at the break and winning as hosts (1/1) is the strongest.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

6 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
Metta - LUTukums II
34Shots3
Metta - LUTukums II
20Shots on target1
Metta - LUTukums II
4.4xG0.49
Metta - LUTukums II
14Corners0
Metta - LUTukums II
122Dangerous attacks30
Metta - LUTukums II
7Fouls3
Metta - LUTukums II
0Cards0
Metta - LUTukums II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Metta - LUTukums II
3.54Goals scored / game1.38
Metta - LUTukums II
0.85Goals allowed / game2.38
Metta - LUTukums II
56%Average possession42%
Metta - LUTukums II
10.69Shots on target / game4.69
Metta - LUTukums II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

20.15Shots per game10.46
Metta - LUTukums II
10.69Shots on target4.69
Metta - LUTukums II
17.6%Shot conversion13.2%
Metta - LUTukums II
56%Possession42%
Metta - LUTukums II
2.83xG for1.57
Metta - LUTukums II
0.73xG against1.79
Metta - LUTukums II

Shooting quality

Metta - LU: DominantTukums II: Counter-attacking
Metta - LUTukums II
Accuracy (shots on target)53%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Metta - LU is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU · 0.6 pts / game - Tukums II

Metta - LU
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
85% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-1
2.62 pts / game · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.52Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Tukums II
LLLLW
Season result split
23% W15% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 157% better for: goals scored per game.

3.54 goals / game - Metta - LU · 1.38 goals / game - Tukums II

Metta - LU is 180% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.85 goals / game - Metta - LU · 2.38 goals / game - Tukums II

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (13 of 13 meczów), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of games (12 of 13 meczów), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 meczów).

46Goals scored (season)18
Metta - LUTukums II
11Goals conceded (season)31
Metta - LUTukums II
4.38Average goals per game3.77
Metta - LUTukums II
19Goals scored (last 5)5
Metta - LUTukums II
7Goals conceded (last 5)15
Metta - LUTukums II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal92%
Metta - LUTukums II
85%2 goals31%
Metta - LUTukums II
69%3 goals8%
Metta - LUTukums II
38%4 goals8%
Metta - LUTukums II

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal85%
Metta - LUTukums II
23%2 goals69%
Metta - LUTukums II
8%3 goals46%
Metta - LUTukums II
0%4 goals23%
Metta - LUTukums II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Metta - LUTukums II
77%Scored in both halves15%
Metta - LUTukums II

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
Metta - LUTukums II
31%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Metta - LUTukums II
80%BTTS - last 560%
Metta - LUTukums II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Metta - LUTukums II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Metta - LUTukums II
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Metta - LUTukums II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Metta - LUTukums II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Metta - LUTukums II
46%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 249% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.69 pts / game - Metta - LU · 0.77 pts / game - Tukums II

Metta - LU - half-time state
85% leading15% draw0% trailing
Tukums II - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.69Points per game (1st half)0.77
Metta - LUTukums II
1.85Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Metta - LUTukums II
0.08Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
Metta - LUTukums II
1.92Average goals (1st half)1.54
Metta - LUTukums II
92%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II
15%No goal before half-time62%
Metta - LUTukums II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.92Points per game (2nd half)1.08
Metta - LUTukums II
1.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Metta - LUTukums II
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
Metta - LUTukums II
2.15Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Metta - LUTukums II
62%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II
15%No goal after half-time31%
Metta - LUTukums II

Metta - LU - second-half results

54% W31% R15% P
35
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+23
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 85% of games and wins 85%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tukums II - second-half results

31% W15% R54% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Metta - LU - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.60
Goals scored / game1.81.6
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game1.82.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+9+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 9
Tukums II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.02.0
Average goals per game1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
7
1
16-30
10
0
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
1
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
3.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
92%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
195%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Metta - LULigaTukums II
Average goals per game 4.383.43 3.77
Both teams scored 54%62% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%68% 69%
Clean sheets 46%22% 15%
Goal before half-time 85%72% 77%
Goal after half-time 85%85% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.61
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUAssistSadiq Saleh
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  3. Metta - LUGoalDaņiils Čiņajevs
  4. Metta - LUGoalRūdolfs Kļavinskis
  5. Metta - LUAssistRūdolfs Kļavinskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Metta - LU's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tukums II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Metta - LU vs Tukums II?

The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 9:0 Tukums II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Tukums II?

Metta - LU score 3.54 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Metta - LU's matches and 77% of Tukums II's.

What form are Metta - LU and Tukums II in?

Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Tukums II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Tukums II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Tukums II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.