Japan - J1 LeagueK's denki Stadium MitoData current as of August 30, 2026

Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mito Hollyhock plays Kashima Antlers in J1 League (Japan). The game is scheduled for September 2, 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito.

Recent form

Mito Hollyhock has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.25 points per game. Kashima Antlers has 4 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Mito Hollyhock scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.25. Kashima Antlers scores 2.75 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's games and 75% of Kashima Antlers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 75%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kashima Antlers has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.52 per game. Mito Hollyhock takes 15.5 shots per game, while Kashima Antlers takes 18.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Mito Hollyhock leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Kashima Antlers leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mito Hollyhock's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Kashima Antlers, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.5Goals scored / game2.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.25Goals allowed / game1.5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
40%Average possession60%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
4.25Shots on target / game5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.5Shots per game18.25
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
4.25Shots on target5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
9.7%Shot conversion15.1%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
40%Possession60%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.52xG for1.84
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.66xG against1.19
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Shooting quality

Mito Hollyhock: AttackingKashima Antlers: Dominant
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
Accuracy (shots on target)27%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.55

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kashima Antlers is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1.25 pts / game - Mito Hollyhock · 3 pts / game - Kashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock
LDWD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-1
1.25 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Kashima Antlers
WWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kashima Antlers is 83% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 2.75 goals / game - Kashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 1.5 goals / game - Kashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Kashima Antlers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).

Kashima Antlers scoring profile: very strong

Kashima Antlers scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

6Goals scored (season)11
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
5Goals conceded (season)6
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
2.75Average goals per game4.25
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
6Goals scored (last 5)11
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%2 goals100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%3 goals50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%4 goals25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%2 goals50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%3 goals25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%4 goals0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%BTTS in both halves50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%Scored in both halves100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
100%BTTS - last 575%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Kashima Antlers - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per game (1st half)1.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
25%No goal before half-time0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)2.5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
1Average goals (2nd half)2.5
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers
50%No goal after half-time0%
Mito HollyhockKashima Antlers

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kashima Antlers - second-half results

75% W25% R0% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Mito Hollyhock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.751.25
Goals scored / game1.00.5
Goals allowed / game0.80.5
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4
Kashima Antlers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.752.50
Goals scored / game1.01.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.82.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals25%50%
Clean sheet50%25%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kashima Antlers
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
88%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kashima Antlers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.91
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
186%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Mito HollyhockLigaKashima Antlers
Average goals per game 2.753.05 4.25
Both teams scored 100%60% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%60% 75%
Clean sheets 0%23% 25%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / game
1.48
Away goals / game
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Mito Hollyhock and Kashima Antlers play?

Mito Hollyhock face Kashima Antlers on September 2, 2026 in J1 League at K's denki Stadium Mito. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?

Mito Hollyhock score 1.50 goals per game on average and Kashima Antlers 2.75. The J1 League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 75% of Kashima Antlers's.

What form are Mito Hollyhock and Kashima Antlers in?

Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Kashima Antlers 4-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Kashima Antlers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.