Japan - J1 LeagueK's denki Stadium MitoData current as of September 13, 2026

Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale: match statistics

Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mito Hollyhock played against Kawasaki Frontale in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: K's denki Stadium Mito. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Mito Hollyhock has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Kawasaki Frontale has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Mito Hollyhock scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.33. Kawasaki Frontale scores 2.00 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.03 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's games and 100% of Kawasaki Frontale's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kawasaki Frontale has the higher season xG average, 1.83 to 1.35 per game. Mito Hollyhock takes 13.2 shots per game, while Kawasaki Frontale takes 17.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Mito Hollyhock leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Kawasaki Frontale leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mito Hollyhock's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Kawasaki Frontale, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 3.03 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mito Hollyhock remain unbeaten at home, winning 1 of their 3 matches and drawing the other 2, while Kawasaki Frontale have failed to win any of their three away games. The hosts average 2.00 goals per match at home—twice as many as the visitors score away from home, where their average stands at 1.00. Kawasaki do create slightly better chances on the road, with an average xG of 1.53 compared with Mito’s 1.29, but Mito are far more clinical, converting 16% of their shots versus 7%. Both defenses concede 1.33 goals per match and neither side has kept a clean sheet, making a draw a realistic outcome. However, I give Mito a slight edge, as they have scored 9 goals in their last five matches and are clearly more efficient at home.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is very strong, as both teams have recorded goals at both ends in 100% of their matches this season, compared with the league average of 60%. Mito score an average of 3.0 goals, while Kawasaki average 1.0, with neither side having kept a clean sheet yet; they concede 1.67 and 1.33 goals per match, respectively. Recent form also supports goals for both teams: BTTS landed in 80% of Mito’s last five matches and in 100% of Kawasaki’s games, while both teams conceded 1.4 goals per match during this period. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG: the hosts create an average of 2.12 xG, while the visitors record 1.53 xG, with their opponents allowing 1.58 and 1.60 xG, respectively. A No Goal scenario for one of the teams is less likely, although Kawasaki’s lower conversion rate of 7% compared with Mito’s 15% slightly reduces confidence in the pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have recorded at least two goals in 100% of their league matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Mito average 3.00 goals scored at home and create chances worth 2.12 xG, while Kawasaki have scored in every match and average 1.53 xG. In their last five appearances, the teams scored 9 and 12 goals respectively, while both conceded 7, supporting the prediction of an open game. The league average stands at 3.00 goals, while the projected 3.10 goals in this match clearly favor the Over 1.5 goals bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Mito Hollyhock has a very strong first-half signal at home: they have led at the break in all three matches played so far, scoring an average of 2.0 goals before half-time. Kawasaki Frontale have yet to score in the first halves of their away matches, while in 67% of those games they went into the break level, reinforcing the scenario of the home side taking the initiative from the outset. The hosts win 67% of their home matches and score an average of 3.0 goals there, compared with the 1.0 goal scored by the visitors away from home. Mito also creates more chances, recording an xG of 2.12 and 7.33 shots on target per match, while Kawasaki has an xG of 1.53 and averages 4.0 shots on target. However, Kawasaki have shown better form over their last five matches, averaging 2.0 points per game, so draw or second-half turnaround scenarios remain relevant. Nevertheless, the most likely outcome is Mito leading at half-time and securing the full-time win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
8Shots19
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
2Shots on target9
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0.9xG2.24
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
2Corners7
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33Dangerous attacks58
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
7Fouls11
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1Cards2
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1.83Goals scored / game2
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1.33Goals allowed / game1.5
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
40%Average possession53%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
4.33Shots on target / game5.67
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.17Shots per game17.33
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
4.33Shots on target5.67
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
13.9%Shot conversion11.5%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
40%Possession53%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1.35xG for1.83
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1.71xG against1.6
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

Shooting quality

Mito Hollyhock: Counter-attackingKawasaki Frontale: Attacking
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Mito Hollyhock is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Mito Hollyhock · 1.6 pts / game - Kawasaki Frontale

Mito Hollyhock
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W50% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%
Kawasaki Frontale
DDWLW
Season result split
33% W50% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kawasaki Frontale is 9% better for: goals scored per game.

1.83 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 2 goals / game - Kawasaki Frontale

Mito Hollyhock is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - Mito Hollyhock · 1.5 goals / game - Kawasaki Frontale

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Kawasaki Frontale keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).

Kawasaki Frontale scoring profile: very strong

Kawasaki Frontale scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).

11Goals scored (season)12
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
8Goals conceded (season)9
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
3.17Average goals per game3.5
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
10Goals scored (last 5)11
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%2 goals50%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%3 goals33%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
17%4 goals17%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%2 goals50%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0%3 goals0%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0%4 goals0%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

100%
Kawasaki Frontale - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 6 meczów
61%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%Scored in both halves33%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing
Kawasaki Frontale - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.83Points per game (1st half)1.83
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%No goal before half-time50%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)1.33
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
1.67Average goals (2nd half)2
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
33%No goal after half-time17%
Mito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

17% W67% D17% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kawasaki Frontale - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mito Hollyhock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.80
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Kawasaki Frontale - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game1.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kawasaki Frontale
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
4
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.33
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Kawasaki Frontale

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Mito HollyhockLigaKawasaki Frontale
Average goals per game 3.173.03 3.50
Both teams scored 100%61% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%58% 67%
Clean sheets 0%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 83%71% 67%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Yu FunabashiOff: Koshi Osaki
  2. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Chihiro KatoOff: Kotaro Uchino
  3. Kawasaki FrontaleYellow cardFilip Uremović
  4. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Ryo NemotoOff: Arata Watanabe
  5. Kawasaki FrontaleYellow cardPedro Henrique de Oliveira Romano
  6. Mito HollyhockYellow cardTaishi Semba
  7. Kawasaki FrontaleSubstitutionOn: So KawaharaOff: Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Romano

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale?

The J1 League match finished Mito Hollyhock 0:1 Kawasaki Frontale. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale?

Mito Hollyhock score 1.83 goals per game on average and Kawasaki Frontale 2.00. The J1 League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Mito Hollyhock's matches and 100% of Kawasaki Frontale's.

What form are Mito Hollyhock and Kawasaki Frontale in?

Over the last 5 games Mito Hollyhock have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Kawasaki Frontale 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.