Bulgaria - First LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Montana vs Botev Plovdiv: match statistics

Montana crest
Montana
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Botev Plovdiv crest
Botev Plovdiv
125%(3.14)
X25%(3.13)
250%(2.30)

Botev Plovdiv presents significantly better form and offensive efficiency than Montana. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with a catastrophic series of 5 matches without a win (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses) and just 0 goals scored in the last five games. Montana has the lowest home win rate (20%) and a poor goal difference (-6). Botev Plovdiv, despite playing away, has twice the average of goals scored (1.64 vs 0.9), better shot conversion (18% vs 9%), and significantly better form in the last five matches (7 points vs 1 point). The visitors' technical and offensive advantage, given the hosts' poor disposition, speaks for a win for Botev Plovdiv.

Montana vs Botev Plovdiv: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Montana play Botev Plovdiv in First League (Bulgaria). The match date is 27 February 2026 at 14:15. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Montana: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Botev Plovdiv: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Montana scores 0.57 and concedes 1.49 goals per match. Botev Plovdiv scores 1.36 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Montana 38%, Botev Plovdiv 50%. Over 2.5: Montana 38%, Botev Plovdiv 58%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Botev Plovdiv has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.15. Montana: 9.0 shots per match, Botev Plovdiv: 12.9.

Match halves

Montana: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.24. Botev Plovdiv: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Montana: 16-30 (6 goals). Botev Plovdiv: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First League: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Botev Plovdiv presents significantly better form and offensive efficiency than Montana. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with a catastrophic series of 5 matches without a win (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses) and just 0 goals scored in the last five games. Montana has the lowest home win rate (20%) and a poor goal difference (-6). Botev Plovdiv, despite playing away, has twice the average of goals scored (1.64 vs 0.9), better shot conversion (18% vs 9%), and significantly better form in the last five matches (7 points vs 1 point). The visitors' technical and offensive advantage, given the hosts' poor disposition, speaks for a win for Botev Plovdiv.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
12Shots16
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
2Shots on target3
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
1.37xG1.88
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
1Corners4
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
66Dangerous attacks92
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
5Fouls9
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0Cards0
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0.57Goals scored / match1.36
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
1.49Goals conceded / match1.25
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
44%Average possession50%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
2.95Shots on target / match4.89
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.97Shots per match12.92
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
2.95Shots on target4.89
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
6.3%Shot conversion10.5%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
44%Possession50%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
1.15xG for1.61
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
1.58xG against1.49
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

Shooting quality

Montana: BalancedBotev Plovdiv: Balanced
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Botev Plovdiv is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Montana · 0.6 pts / match - Botev Plovdiv

Montana
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W30% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-11-22
0.62 pts / match · goal difference -34
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-6-9
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Botev Plovdiv
LLLWL
Season result split
36% W19% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-16
1.28 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-8
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Botev Plovdiv is 139% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - Montana · 1.36 goals / match - Botev Plovdiv

Botev Plovdiv is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.49 goals / match - Montana · 1.25 goals / match - Botev Plovdiv

Montana scoring profile: mixed

Montana scores in 49% of matches (18 of 37 matches), while Botev Plovdiv keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).

Botev Plovdiv scoring profile: very strong

Botev Plovdiv scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 matches).

21Goals scored (season)49
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
55Goals conceded (season)45
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
2.05Average goals in match2.61
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
4Goals scored (last 5)7
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

How often they score at least...

49%1 goal69%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
8%2 goals39%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0%3 goals14%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0%4 goals8%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal69%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
43%2 goals36%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
19%3 goals14%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
5%4 goals3%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time25%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0%BTTS in both halves6%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
3%Scored in both halves22%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
40%BTTS - last 540%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Botev Plovdiv is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Montana · 1.08 pts / match - Botev Plovdiv

Montana - half-time state
14% leading49% draw38% trailing
Botev Plovdiv - half-time state
17% leading58% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)1.08
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.47
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.03
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
51%Clean sheet before half-time53%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
73%No goal before half-time58%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

After half-time (2nd half)

0.7Points per match (2nd half)1.31
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
0.97Average goals (2nd half)1.47
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
43%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv
76%No goal after half-time53%
MontanaBotev Plovdiv

Montana - second-half results

5% W54% R41% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Botev Plovdiv - second-half results

33% W31% R36% P
39
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding212%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.00
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+2-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Botev Plovdiv - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Montana
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
6
11
16-30
3
9
31-45
5
9
46-60
3
10
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Botev Plovdiv
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
6
12
16-30
7
6
31-45
10
6
46-60
8
8
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Montana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

Botev Plovdiv

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First League).

Teams vs league

MontanaLigaBotev Plovdiv
Average goals in match 2.052.30 2.61
Both teams scored 38%43% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%43% 58%
Clean sheets 24%35% 31%
Goal before half-time 62%63% 64%
Goal after half-time 62%74% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.30
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Montana 1 - 0 - 0 Botev Plovdiv. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Botev Plovdiv
0 : 1
PFC Montana

FAQ

What was the result of Montana vs Botev Plovdiv?

The First League match finished Montana 0:0 Botev Plovdiv. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montana vs Botev Plovdiv?

Montana score 0.57 goals per game on average and Botev Plovdiv 1.36. The First League average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Montana's matches and 50% of Botev Plovdiv's.

What form are Montana and Botev Plovdiv in?

Over the last 5 games Montana have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Botev Plovdiv 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montana vs Botev Plovdiv?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.