Moss vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Moss vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Moss played against Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The game was played on October 5, 2026. Venue: Melløs Stadion. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Moss has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Moss scores 1.65 goals per game and allows 2.26. Kongsvinger scores 2.96 and allows 1.52. Games in this league average 3.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 87% of Moss's games and 83% of Kongsvinger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 91% and 83%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.58 per game. Moss takes 13.0 shots per game, while Kongsvinger takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Moss leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Moss's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Kongsvinger, it is minutes 46-60 (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.83 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger sit 2nd in the table and have won 3 of their last 5 matches without suffering a defeat, while 11th-placed Moss have won 2 and lost 2 over the same period. The visitors have scored an impressive 22 goals in those five matches, compared with the hosts’ 8, and average 2.09 goals per game away from home with an 18% shot conversion rate, while Moss average 1.55 goals and 12% at home. The hosts’ defense is a significant concern: they concede an average of 2.18 goals per game at home, while Kongsvinger concede 1.27 away. The visitors also hold the edge in away wins, with a 55% win rate compared with Moss’s home win rate of just 18%. The quality of the chances they create offers the hosts some hope—their home xG is 1.60, compared with Kongsvinger’s 1.48 away—but Kongsvinger’s advantage in finishing and results points to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Moss have seen both teams score in 92% of their home matches, while Kongsvinger have seen it in 73% of their away games; this scenario has occurred in each of the last 5 matches for both teams. Moss have failed to score in none of their home matches, while the visitors have drawn a blank in only 9% of their away games, so the risk of either side failing to score is low. Over their last 5 matches, Moss have averaged 1.6 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, while Kongsvinger have scored 4.4 and conceded 1.8 goals per match. Their attacking potential is also reflected in their average xG: 1.98 at home for Moss and 1.48 away for Kongsvinger, with clean sheets recorded in just 8% and 18% of their matches, respectively. These figures strongly point towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: this line was reached in 100% of Moss’s home matches and 91% of Kongsvinger’s away matches. The teams’ attacking xG averages also point to goals — 1.98 for Moss and 1.48 for Kongsvinger — as does the fact that the hosts conceded in 92% of their matches and the visitors in 82%. In each team’s last five matches, Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of cases, supporting a forecast of 3.75 total goals. Even so, I’m backing Over 1.5 as the safest line: the teams’ historical results support it more clearly than Over 2.5, which landed in 100% of Moss’s home matches but only 64% of Kongsvinger’s away matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal for the first half comes from the last five matches: Moss were trailing at half-time in four of them, while Kongsvinger led in three. During this period, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals before the break, while the hosts conceded 1.6, increasing the likelihood of Kongsvinger taking the lead. Current form also supports them holding on to that advantage: the visitors have lost none of their last five matches and scored an average of 4.4 goals, compared with Moss’s 1.6. However, the 2/2 HT/FT pick is not a clear-cut one, as Moss won 75% of their home matches over the season and averaged 2.5 goals after the break; a turnaround therefore remains a significant alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Moss | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kongsvinger is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Moss · 2.2 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 79% better for: goals scored per game.
1.65 goals / game - Moss · 2.96 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.26 goals / game - Moss · 1.52 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Moss scores in 91% of games (21 of 23 games), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 games).
Kongsvinger scores in 96% of games (22 of 23 games), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Moss
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / game - Moss · 1.65 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Moss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +9 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Moss
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Moss | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.91 | 3.83 | ▲ 4.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 87% | 64% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 91% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 19% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 89% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Moss's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Kongsvinger. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Moss vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Moss 0:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Moss and Kongsvinger?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Moss won 0, Kongsvinger won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Kongsvinger?
Moss score 1.65 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.96. The First Division average is 3.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 87% of Moss's matches and 83% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Moss and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Moss have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Kongsvinger?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.