Moss vs Sandnes Ulf: match statistics
Moss vs Sandnes Ulf: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Moss play Sandnes Ulf in First Division (Norway). The match date is 21 June 2026 at 16:00. Venue: Melløs Stadion. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
Moss: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sandnes Ulf: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Moss scores 1.64 and concedes 2.29 goals per match. Sandnes Ulf scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Moss 79%, Sandnes Ulf 50%. Over 2.5: Moss 86%, Sandnes Ulf 43%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Moss has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.41. Moss: 14.6 shots per match, Sandnes Ulf: 12.1.
Match halves
Moss: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. Sandnes Ulf: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.21.
Goals by minute
Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). Sandnes Ulf: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I predict a Moss win (1): the hosts have scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 goals per home game, while Sandnes Ulf score only 0.8 goals on the road. Moss generate 14.6 shots and 4.4 on-target per home match with an 11% conversion rate, versus 10.2 shots, 3.2 on-target and 8% conversion for Sandnes, giving Moss a clear advantage in chance quality. Defensively Sandnes concede 2.2 goals per away match and have an 80% loss rate at opponents’ grounds, whereas Moss concede 1.4 at home and have 0% of matches without scoring, indicating greater home stability. This is supported by xG: Moss average 1.59 xG at home vs Sandnes 1.3 xG away, and Sandnes only convert 0.8 goals from 1.3 xG; considering Moss’s home record (40% wins, 20% losses) and Sandnes’s poor away form (’lwlll’ with 4 defeats in their last 5 away matches), I assess probabilities of 60% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 20% for the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Moss | Sandnes Ulf | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sandnes Ulf is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Moss · 2 pts / match - Sandnes Ulf
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sandnes Ulf is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.29 goals / match - Moss · 1.43 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf
Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
Sandnes Ulf scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Moss
Over / Under — Sandnes Ulf
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sandnes Ulf - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Moss
Sandnes Ulf
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Moss | Liga | Sandnes Ulf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.93 | 3.75 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 73% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 21% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Moss vs Sandnes Ulf?
The First Division match finished Moss 1:4 Sandnes Ulf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Moss vs Sandnes Ulf?
Moss score 1.64 goals per game on average and Sandnes Ulf 1.57. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Moss's matches and 50% of Sandnes Ulf's.
What form are Moss and Sandnes Ulf in?
Over the last 5 games Moss have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sandnes Ulf 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Moss vs Sandnes Ulf?
The statistical background for Moss vs Sandnes Ulf — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.