MP vs JIPPO: match statistics
MP vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MP played against JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
MP has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. JIPPO has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
MP scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. JIPPO scores 1.00 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 17% of MP's games and 33% of JIPPO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 17%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.26 per game. MP takes 10.0 shots per game, while JIPPO takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
MP leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. JIPPO leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
MP's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For JIPPO, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.31 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JIPPO holds a clear offensive edge: away they score an average of 2.0 goals per match with 14.5 shots and a 14% conversion rate, while MP at home averages only 0.5 goals per match with 10 shots and a 5% conversion. The visitors also generate better expected chances — JIPPO’s average xG away is 1.53, and MP concedes an average home xG against of 1.25, indicating higher quality opportunities created by JIPPO. Defensively both teams concede on average 0.5 goals, but MP fail to score in 50% of their home matches, whereas JIPPO have not had a match without scoring on the road (0% scoreless matches). In the last 5 fixtures MP record 3 wins and 2 losses (1.8 points per match), and JIPPO 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (1.6 points per match); however, JIPPO’s absence of away defeats (0 losses, 100% wins) combined with markedly better conversion gives the visitors a tangible advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict Both Teams To Score = No with a 65% probability versus 35% for BTTS - Yes. MP at home has a 75% clean sheet rate and concedes only 0.25 goals on average this season while scoring just 0.5, strongly indicating a low likelihood of the hosts scoring. JIPPO averages 2.0 goals on the road and has a high conversion rate of 14% seasonally, but in the last 5 matches they scored only 5 goals (1.0 avg) and conceded 0.6, so their short-term scoring form is moderate. xG data shows similar chance creation (xG: MP 1.66 vs JIPPO 1.53), yet MP allows only 0.87 xG against and has a low conversion rate of 4%, meaning the hosts frequently fail to convert chances — overall supporting a No Goal/No BTTS outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive averages, I estimate MP at ~1.53 expected goals (xG_for 1.66 and opponent xG_against 1.40 → average 1.53), and JIPPO at ~1.20 (xG_for 1.53 and opponent xG_against 0.87 → 1.20), giving a combined total of ~2.73 goals. The raw xG_for sum of both teams is 1.66+1.53=3.19, and in MP’s last 5 matches their xG_for was 1.39 while they scored on average 1.8 goals, showing increased chance volume in recent form. JIPPO has a seasonal average of 2.0 goals and 100% of matches over 1.5; additionally JIPPO’s shot conversion is 14.0% vs 4.0% for MP, so the visitors are more efficient at converting chances. MP, however, has 75% clean sheets this season, which limits the risk of a high-scoring game, but the xG balance and JIPPO’s clinical finishing prevail; therefore I assess an 85% probability for Over 1.5, 62% for Over 2.5 and only 28% for Over 3.5. Best recommendation is Over 1.5 (side: Over, line: 1.5), since the expected 2.73 goals and JIPPO’s 100% of matches over 1.5 indicate the strongest signal for at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side MP drew at half-time in 4 of their matches (drawingAtHT_home = 4, drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100%) and failed to score before the break (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0), strongly favouring a half-time draw. JIPPO posts a seasonal goals-scored average of 2.0 (seasonScoredAVG_away = 2.0) and a matches-per-game average of 2.5 goals (seasonAVG_away = 2.5) versus MP’s 0.5 and 0.75 (seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.5, seasonAVG_home = 0.75); JIPPO’s win rate is 100% compared to MP’s 25%, so the visitors are superior in the overall outcome. Both teams create chances — home xG 1.66 against away xG 1.53 — yet finishing efficiency lies with JIPPO: 14% versus MP’s 4%, indicating greater conversion by the visitors. In the second half JIPPO averages 1.0 goals (scored_2hg_avg_away = 1.0) versus MP’s 0.5 (scored_2hg_avg_home = 0.5), and the hosts keep a half-time clean sheet record (seasonCSPercentageHT_home = 100%), therefore the strongest scenario is a half-time draw and an away win at full-time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MP | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JIPPO is 83% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - MP · 2.2 pts / game - JIPPO
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - MP · 1 goals / game - JIPPO
JIPPO is 203% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - MP · 0.33 goals / game - JIPPO
MP scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 meczów), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 meczów).
JIPPO scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - JIPPO
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - MP · 1.17 pts / game - JIPPO
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MP
JIPPO
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | JIPPO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.50 | 2.31 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 17% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 41% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 33% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs JIPPO?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 1:3 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs JIPPO?
MP score 0.50 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 17% of MP's matches and 33% of JIPPO's.
What form are MP and JIPPO in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and JIPPO 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs JIPPO?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.