MP vs KTP: match statistics
MP vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MP played against KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 25, 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
MP has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. KTP has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
MP scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.27. KTP scores 1.67 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of MP's games and 40% of KTP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.23 per game. MP takes 9.9 shots per game, while KTP takes 15.3.
First-half and second-half trends
MP leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. KTP leads at halftime in 27% and scores 1.07 after halftime.
When the teams score
MP's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For KTP, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites in this match are the visitors, KTP: they sit 2nd in the table and have 10 wins this season compared to MP’s 5, and over the last 5 matches KTP have averaged 2 points per game versus MP’s 1. Offensively KTP are superior — 25 goals this season versus MP’s 14, and 14 goals in the last 5 matches versus the hosts’ 7; KTP’s away goals average is 1.29 vs MP’s 1.17 at home. Defensively the visitors also look better: they concede 0.86 goals on average away, while MP concede 1.17 at home, and the visitors’ clean sheet rate is 71% versus the hosts’ 33%. The quality of chances created is confirmed by xG and shot volume — KTP have xG 1.68, 15.57 shots and 4.29 on target per match, MP have xG 1.20, 10 shots and 3.17 on target; although MP have a higher conversion rate 12% vs 8%, KTP’s advantage in chance creation is clear. Considering better form (2 pts vs 1 pt in the last 5), the xG edge and stronger away defense, I assign KTP a 65% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis indicates a BTTS-favored scenario: combined xG for both teams is 1.85 + 1.68 = 3.53, suggesting a high likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches MP has BTTS at 100% and averages 1.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while KTP scored 14 goals (2.8 per match) and conceded 6 (1.2) in the same period, with KTP’s last 5 matches showing BTTS at 60%. A counter-signal is KTP’s season clean sheet rate of 71% and season BTTS share of only 29%, which theoretically favors No BTTS, but the visitors’ recent form significantly mitigates that. Additionally, MP averages 5.75 shots on target with a 13% conversion versus KTP’s 4.29 and 8%, and season goal averages of 2.0 for the home side and 1.29 for the away side increase MP’s chance to score. Considering the combined xG of 3.53 and strong signals from the last 5 matches (MP 100% BTTS, KTP 60% BTTS), the pick Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal) appears more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging offensive xG and xG against the opponent, I assess that MP has 1.53 expected goals ((1.85+1.21)/2), and KTP 1.38 ((1.68+1.07)/2), giving a total of 2.91 expected goals. With a total expected goals of 2.91, the probability of Over 1.5 is roughly 79%, Over 2.5 about 56%, and Over 3.5 around 33%. Match trends reinforce the signal: in the last 5 fixtures MP scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), KTP 14 goals (2.8 avg), and their recent xG are 1.18 and 1.70. A counterpoint is KTP’s high clean sheet rate — 71% of matches — and a low away both-teams-to-score rate (29%), which reduces the likelihood of BTTS; nevertheless MP averages 5.75 shots on target and has a 13% conversion rate, so there is a realistic chance of at least two goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: over 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~79%; Over 2.5 is an alternative at ~56%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an away win (X/2): the home side draw in 50% of matches at the break, while the visitors do so in 57%. After the break the visitors have clearly better final results — the season-long away win rate is 71% versus 63% for homes, and in the last 5 matches the visitors won 60% of games while the hosts only 20%. The average goals at half-time are 0.63 for the home team and 0.57 for the visitors, which increases the chance of an HT draw, whereas the average points per match favor the visitors (2.29 vs 2.0), so they can produce a turnaround after the break. Technically the hosts generate slightly more xG (1.85 vs 1.68) and have more shots on target (5.75 vs 4.29), but in the last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 40% and scored 9 first-half goals versus 4 for the hosts, which supports the expectation that they will gain more after the interval. Therefore I select X/2 (28%) as the strongest signal; alternatively X/X (20%) and 2/2 (18%) are meaningful due to the high HT draw rates (50–57%) and the visitors’ good finishing efficiency (60–71%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MP | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KTP is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - MP · 2 pts / game - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 80% better for: goals scored per game.
0.93 goals / game - MP · 1.67 goals / game - KTP
KTP is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.27 goals / game - MP · 1 goals / game - KTP
MP scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 meczów).
KTP scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - KTP
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - MP · 1.33 pts / game - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KTP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MP
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.20 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 61% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from MP's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against KTP. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 3:3 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs KTP?
MP score 0.93 goals per game on average and KTP 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 47% of MP's matches and 40% of KTP's.
What form are MP and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs KTP?
The statistical background for MP vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


