MP vs PK-35: match statistics
MP vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MP played against PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
MP has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. PK-35 has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
MP scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 1.50. PK-35 scores 1.70 and allows 0.70. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of MP's games and 40% of PK-35's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 45%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PK-35 has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.35 per game. MP takes 11.4 shots per game, while PK-35 takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
MP leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. PK-35 leads at halftime in 35% and scores 1.10 after halftime.
When the teams score
MP's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For PK-35, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PK-35 sit 2nd, having won 12 of 20 matches and lost only 3, while MP have a record of 6 wins and 11 defeats. The visitors are particularly strong away from home: they win 78% of their matches, score an average of 1.67 goals and concede just 0.11 per game, keeping a clean sheet in 89% of their appearances. At home, MP score an average of 1.33 goals but allow opponents an xG of 1.56 and concede 1.44 goals, creating favourable conditions for PK-35 to exploit their 14% conversion rate. Recent form also favors the visitors, who have averaged 1.6 points and conceded 6 goals across their last five matches, whereas MP have earned 0.8 points per game and allowed opponents to score 11 times. PK-35’s defensive superiority and exceptionally high away efficiency point to the visitors as the most likely winners.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal signal clearly supports the BTTS - No option: PK-35 kept a clean sheet in 89% of matches and had not a single BTTS game, while the league average for BTTS stands at 44%. MP scores 1.73 goals per home game and has an xG of 1.52, but the opponent conceded only 0.11 goals per match on average, significantly limiting the hosts’ chances. PK-35 has an attacking potential of 1.67 goals and an xG of 1.44, but MP keeps a clean sheet in only 18% of matches, making the most realistic scenario an away goal with the hosts failing to score. The last five appearances increase the BTTS risk, as both teams recorded a 60% rate during that period and MP conceded 2.2 goals on average; however, this sample is weaker than PK-35’s very strong full-season defensive profile. The “No” pick has a slight edge because it also covers outcomes where only one team scores, not exclusively a goalless draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
PK-35 has a very solid defensive profile in the competition, conceding just 0.11 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 89% of its fixtures. MP does average 1.73 goals at home, but its last five matches produced only 8 goals scored, alongside a lack of stability after conceding 11 goals. The combined xG figures point to a more moderate scenario, with MP averaging 1.52 xG and PK-35 1.44 xG, supporting a projection of around 2.40 goals. On a season-long basis, PK-35 finished below 3.5 goals in as many as 89% of matches, while the figure for MP stands at 64%. This makes Under 3.5 the stronger edge, as even if both teams score, reaching the high threshold of four goals would require a significantly more open game than the visitors' defensive profile suggests.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a PK-35 win, as both teams were level at the break in 44% and 55% of their matches, respectively, while PK-35 conceded an average of just 0.11 goals before half-time. The visitors have been significantly more effective over the season as a whole: they have won 78% of their matches and average 2.44 points per game, compared with MP’s 45% win rate and 1.73 points per match. PK-35’s defense has conceded an average of only 0.11 goals per game and kept a clean sheet in 89% of its appearances, which significantly reduces the hosts’ chances of maintaining a favourable result. After the break, the visitors score an average of 1.11 goals and concede none, whereas MP have scored only 0.2 goals after half-time across their last five matches. Current form also supports the away side: PK-35 have lost only 20% of their last five matches, while MP have lost as many as 60%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MP | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PK-35 is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - MP · 1.6 pts / game - PK-35
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
1.1 goals / game - MP · 1.7 goals / game - PK-35
PK-35 is 114% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - MP · 0.7 goals / game - PK-35
MP scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 meczów).
PK-35 scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - MP · 1.55 pts / game - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 30%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MP
PK-35
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.60 | 2.48 | • 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 45% | • 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from MP's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against PK-35. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs PK-35?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 0:3 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MP and PK-35?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs PK-35?
MP score 1.10 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.70. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MP's matches and 40% of PK-35's.
What form are MP and PK-35 in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PK-35 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs PK-35?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MP vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


