Hungary - NB IData current as of September 11, 2026

MTK vs Paksi SE: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Paksi SE crest
Paksi SE
135%(2.70)
X35%(3.60)
230%(2.15)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. MTK boasts a better offense in home games (2.38 goals/match), but their recent form is poor (0 wins in 5 matches, 0.8 pts/match). Paksi SE holds a better league position and a more solid away defense (1.08 goals conceded/match), yet their current form is also concerning (0 wins in the last 5 matches, 0.4 pts/match). Paksi's high away draw rate (31%) and the similar xG values of both teams (MTK 1.66 vs Paksi 1.80) further support the prediction of a share of the points. Taking into account MTK's home advantage and the visitors' slightly better overall disposition, I predict a slight edge for the hosts, but a draw remains the most realistic scenario.

MTK vs Paksi SE: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

MTK played against Paksi SE in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on March 20, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

MTK has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Paksi SE has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

MTK scores 1.73 goals per game and allows 2.08. Paksi SE scores 1.81 and allows 1.46. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 69% of MTK's games and 73% of Paksi SE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 65%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Paksi SE has the higher season xG average, 2.05 to 1.52 per game. MTK takes 12.9 shots per game, while Paksi SE takes 16.5.

First-half and second-half trends

MTK leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 1.08 goals per game after halftime. Paksi SE leads at halftime in 27% and scores 1.08 after halftime.

When the teams score

MTK's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Paksi SE, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. MTK boasts a better offense in home games (2.38 goals/match), but their recent form is poor (0 wins in 5 matches, 0.8 pts/match). Paksi SE holds a better league position and a more solid away defense (1.08 goals conceded/match), yet their current form is also concerning (0 wins in the last 5 matches, 0.4 pts/match). Paksi's high away draw rate (31%) and the similar xG values of both teams (MTK 1.66 vs Paksi 1.80) further support the prediction of a share of the points. Taking into account MTK's home advantage and the visitors' slightly better overall disposition, I predict a slight edge for the hosts, but a draw remains the most realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
MTKPaksi SE
13Shots7
MTKPaksi SE
6Shots on target2
MTKPaksi SE
1.6xG1.08
MTKPaksi SE
6Corners3
MTKPaksi SE
49Dangerous attacks67
MTKPaksi SE
14Fouls14
MTKPaksi SE
1Cards1
MTKPaksi SE

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.73Goals scored / game1.81
MTKPaksi SE
2.08Goals allowed / game1.46
MTKPaksi SE
50%Average possession48%
MTKPaksi SE
4.73Shots on target / game6.46
MTKPaksi SE

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.92Shots per game16.54
MTKPaksi SE
4.73Shots on target6.46
MTKPaksi SE
13.4%Shot conversion10.9%
MTKPaksi SE
50%Possession48%
MTKPaksi SE
1.52xG for2.05
MTKPaksi SE
1.91xG against1.56
MTKPaksi SE

Shooting quality

MTK: Efficient finishingPaksi SE: Attacking
MTKPaksi SE
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

MTK is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - MTK · 0.4 pts / game - Paksi SE

MTK
DLDDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
27% W27% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-12
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Paksi SE
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-8
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paksi SE is 5% better for: goals scored per game.

1.73 goals / game - MTK · 1.81 goals / game - Paksi SE

Paksi SE is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.08 goals / game - MTK · 1.46 goals / game - Paksi SE

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 85% of games (22 of 26 meczów), while Paksi SE keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 meczów).

Paksi SE scoring profile: very strong

Paksi SE scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 meczów), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 meczów).

45Goals scored (season)47
MTKPaksi SE
54Goals conceded (season)38
MTKPaksi SE
3.81Average goals per game3.27
MTKPaksi SE
6Goals scored (last 5)6
MTKPaksi SE
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
MTKPaksi SE

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal81%
MTKPaksi SE
46%2 goals54%
MTKPaksi SE
23%3 goals31%
MTKPaksi SE
12%4 goals8%
MTKPaksi SE

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal85%
MTKPaksi SE
54%2 goals42%
MTKPaksi SE
42%3 goals15%
MTKPaksi SE
19%4 goals4%
MTKPaksi SE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time31%
MTKPaksi SE
12%BTTS in both halves19%
MTKPaksi SE
27%Scored in both halves42%
MTKPaksi SE

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
MTKPaksi SE
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
MTKPaksi SE
80%BTTS - last 580%
MTKPaksi SE

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
MTKPaksi SE
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
MTKPaksi SE
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
MTKPaksi SE

2nd half

96%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
MTKPaksi SE
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
MTKPaksi SE
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
MTKPaksi SE

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paksi SE is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / game - MTK · 1.42 pts / game - Paksi SE

MTK - half-time state
23% leading23% draw54% trailing
Paksi SE - half-time state
27% leading62% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per game (1st half)1.42
MTKPaksi SE
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.73
MTKPaksi SE
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
MTKPaksi SE
1.65Average goals (1st half)1.19
MTKPaksi SE
31%Clean sheet before half-time65%
MTKPaksi SE
62%No goal before half-time46%
MTKPaksi SE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per game (2nd half)1.38
MTKPaksi SE
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
MTKPaksi SE
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)1
MTKPaksi SE
2.15Average goals (2nd half)2.08
MTKPaksi SE
46%Clean sheet after half-time27%
MTKPaksi SE
27%No goal after half-time31%
MTKPaksi SE

MTK - second-half results

50% W8% D42% L
24
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Paksi SE - second-half results

38% W23% D38% L
37
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

MTK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.60
Goals scored / game0.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-4+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Paksi SE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

MTK
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
5
10
16-30
7
11
31-45
9
6
46-60
9
9
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Paksi SE
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
7
6
16-30
10
5
31-45
8
9
46-60
5
10
61-75
15
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Paksi SE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaPaksi SE
Average goals per game 3.812.97 3.27
Both teams scored 69%62% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%59% 65%
Clean sheets 19%21% 15%
Goal before half-time 85%68% 58%
Goal after half-time 96%88% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.48
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Milán SzekszárdiOff: Bence Lenzsér
  2. MTKYellow cardMihály Kata
  3. MTKSubstitutionOn: Artúr HorváthOff: Adrian Zeljković
  4. Paksi SEGoalÁkos SzendreiAssist: Kristóf Papp
  5. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Kevin HorváthOff: Jozsef Windecker
  6. MTKSubstitutionOn: Benedek VarjuOff: Tamás Kádár
  7. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Barna TóthOff: János Csaba Hahn
  8. Paksi SEYellow cardZsombor Bévárdi
  9. MTKSubstitutionOn: Krisztián NémethOff: Vilius Armalas
  10. Paksi SEGoalDániel BödeAssist: Barna Tóth

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Balazs BerkeMatches officiated: 18
3.83Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 222%Home wins17%Draws61%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from MTK's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Paksi SE. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Paksi SE
3 : 1
MTK Budapest FC
MTK Budapest FC
2 : 3
Paksi SE

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Paksi SE?

The NB I match finished MTK 0:2 Paksi SE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Paksi SE?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MTK won 0, Paksi SE won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Paksi SE?

MTK score 1.73 goals per game on average and Paksi SE 1.81. The NB I average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 69% of MTK's matches and 73% of Paksi SE's.

What form are MTK and Paksi SE in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Paksi SE 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Paksi SE?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MTK vs Paksi SE: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.