Hungary - NB IData current as of 19 July 2026

MTK vs Paksi SE: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Paksi SE crest
Paksi SE
135%(2.70)
X35%(3.60)
230%(2.15)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. MTK boasts a better offense in home games (2.38 goals/match), but their recent form is poor (0 wins in 5 matches, 0.8 pts/match). Paksi SE holds a better league position and a more solid away defense (1.08 goals conceded/match), yet their current form is also concerning (0 wins in the last 5 matches, 0.4 pts/match). Paksi's high away draw rate (31%) and the similar xG values of both teams (MTK 1.66 vs Paksi 1.80) further support the prediction of a share of the points. Taking into account MTK's home advantage and the visitors' slightly better overall disposition, I predict a slight edge for the hosts, but a draw remains the most realistic scenario.

MTK vs Paksi SE: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MTK play Paksi SE in NB I (Hungary). The match date is 20 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

MTK: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Paksi SE: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

MTK scores 1.67 and concedes 1.88 goals per match. Paksi SE scores 1.91 and concedes 1.39. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MTK 67%, Paksi SE 67%. Over 2.5: MTK 70%, Paksi SE 61%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Paksi SE has higher xG: 1.92 vs 1.56. MTK: 13.4 shots per match, Paksi SE: 15.4.

Match halves

MTK: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.09. Paksi SE: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.09.

Goals by minute

MTK: 76-90+ (14 goals). Paksi SE: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. MTK boasts a better offense in home games (2.38 goals/match), but their recent form is poor (0 wins in 5 matches, 0.8 pts/match). Paksi SE holds a better league position and a more solid away defense (1.08 goals conceded/match), yet their current form is also concerning (0 wins in the last 5 matches, 0.4 pts/match). Paksi's high away draw rate (31%) and the similar xG values of both teams (MTK 1.66 vs Paksi 1.80) further support the prediction of a share of the points. Taking into account MTK's home advantage and the visitors' slightly better overall disposition, I predict a slight edge for the hosts, but a draw remains the most realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
MTKPaksi SE
13Shots7
MTKPaksi SE
6Shots on target2
MTKPaksi SE
1.6xG1.08
MTKPaksi SE
6Corners3
MTKPaksi SE
49Dangerous attacks67
MTKPaksi SE
14Fouls14
MTKPaksi SE
1Cards1
MTKPaksi SE

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match1.91
MTKPaksi SE
1.88Goals conceded / match1.39
MTKPaksi SE
50%Average possession48%
MTKPaksi SE
4.94Shots on target / match6
MTKPaksi SE

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.42Shots per match15.42
MTKPaksi SE
4.94Shots on target6
MTKPaksi SE
12.4%Shot conversion12.4%
MTKPaksi SE
50%Possession48%
MTKPaksi SE
1.56xG for1.92
MTKPaksi SE
1.81xG against1.53
MTKPaksi SE

Shooting quality

MTK: BalancedPaksi SE: Attacking
MTKPaksi SE
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MTK
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-13
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Paksi SE
LWLWW
Season result split
45% W24% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-10
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paksi SE is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - MTK · 1.91 goals / match - Paksi SE

Paksi SE is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.88 goals / match - MTK · 1.39 goals / match - Paksi SE

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Paksi SE keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).

Paksi SE scoring profile: very strong

Paksi SE scores in 79% of matches (26 of 33 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 33 matches).

55Goals scored (season)63
MTKPaksi SE
62Goals conceded (season)46
MTKPaksi SE
3.55Average goals in match3.3
MTKPaksi SE
8Goals scored (last 5)9
MTKPaksi SE
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
MTKPaksi SE

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal79%
MTKPaksi SE
48%2 goals55%
MTKPaksi SE
21%3 goals33%
MTKPaksi SE
9%4 goals12%
MTKPaksi SE

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal82%
MTKPaksi SE
52%2 goals42%
MTKPaksi SE
33%3 goals12%
MTKPaksi SE
15%4 goals3%
MTKPaksi SE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time27%
MTKPaksi SE
12%BTTS in both halves15%
MTKPaksi SE
27%Scored in both halves42%
MTKPaksi SE

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
MTKPaksi SE
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
MTKPaksi SE
60%BTTS - last 540%
MTKPaksi SE

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
MTKPaksi SE
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
MTKPaksi SE
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
MTKPaksi SE

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
MTKPaksi SE
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
MTKPaksi SE
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time39%
MTKPaksi SE

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paksi SE is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - MTK · 1.52 pts / match - Paksi SE

MTK - half-time state
21% leading33% draw45% trailing
Paksi SE - half-time state
33% leading52% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.52
MTKPaksi SE
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.82
MTKPaksi SE
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
MTKPaksi SE
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.3
MTKPaksi SE
39%Clean sheet before half-time64%
MTKPaksi SE
64%No goal before half-time42%
MTKPaksi SE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.39
MTKPaksi SE
1.09Goals scored (2nd half)1.09
MTKPaksi SE
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
MTKPaksi SE
2.12Average goals (2nd half)2
MTKPaksi SE
42%Clean sheet after half-time30%
MTKPaksi SE
27%No goal after half-time36%
MTKPaksi SE

MTK - second-half results

42% W21% R36% P
32
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paksi SE - second-half results

39% W21% R39% P
50
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.22.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Paksi SE - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MTK
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
7
10
16-30
7
12
31-45
12
6
46-60
10
9
61-75
14
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Paksi SE
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
9
6
16-30
13
7
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
12
61-75
20
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Paksi SE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaPaksi SE
Average goals in match 3.553.00 3.30
Both teams scored 67%60% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%60% 61%
Clean sheets 21%22% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 94%87% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MTK 0 - 0 - 2 Paksi SE. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Paksi SE
3 : 1
MTK Budapest FC
MTK Budapest FC
2 : 3
Paksi SE

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Paksi SE?

The NB I match finished MTK 0:2 Paksi SE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Paksi SE?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MTK won 0, Paksi SE won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Paksi SE?

MTK score 1.67 goals per game on average and Paksi SE 1.91. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of MTK's matches and 67% of Paksi SE's.

What form are MTK and Paksi SE in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Paksi SE 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Paksi SE?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MTK vs Paksi SE: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.