Hungary - NB IHidegkuti Nándor StadionData current as of September 19, 2026

MTK vs Puskás: match statistics

MTK crest
MTK
2 : 3half-time 0:2
Puskás crest
Puskás

MTK vs Puskás: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

MTK played against Puskás in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on August 7, 2026. Venue: Hidegkuti Nándor Stadion. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

MTK has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Puskás has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.

Scoring records

MTK scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Puskás scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.75 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of MTK's games and 0% of Puskás's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

MTK has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.23 per game. MTK takes 11.0 shots per game, while Puskás takes 10.0.

First-half and second-half trends

MTK leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. Puskás leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

MTK's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Puskás, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 3.75 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

MTK sit 2nd, while Puskás are 6th, and the hosts remain unbeaten this season: 1 win and 1 draw. At home, MTK won their only match so far 3:0, averaging 12 shots, including 6 on target, with an xG of 1.39. Puskás also won their only away match without conceding, but they create lower-quality chances than their opponents, with an average xG of 1.09 compared with MTK’s 1.39, while also allowing opponents an xG of 1.50. The visitors are, however, in clearly better form over their last five matches, in which they collected 10 points and scored 9 goals, whereas MTK recorded as many as 4 draws. Home advantage, a higher volume of goalscoring opportunities and a better chance-quality balance slightly favor an MTK victory, but a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The latest form of both teams favors goals at both ends: MTK and Puskás have each averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches. During the same period, the hosts conceded 1.2 goals per game and the visitors 1.0, while their elevated xG against figures stood at 1.48 and 1.55, respectively. BTTS occurred in 60% of MTK’s last five matches and in 40% of Puskás’ games, providing a moderately positive signal for the “Yes” option overall. Seasonal data is very limited and extreme, as MTK failed to score while Puskás kept clean sheets in 100% of their matches; therefore, greater weight should be placed on current form. With the league average for BTTS at 55%, the most likely scenario is that both teams will score at least one goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, MTK averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Puskás also averaged 1.8 goals scored, with 1.0 conceded. Both sides clearly possess creative potential: their average xG over five matches stands at 1.52 for MTK and 1.64 for Puskás, while their opponents were allowed 1.48 and 1.55 xG, respectively. This produces a projected total of 3.07 goals, while the league averages as many as 3.45 goals per match, with 64% of games featuring at least three goals. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have surpassed this line in 100% of their league matches so far, and their current attacking output supports a scenario with at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Puskás are showing clearly stronger results-based form: they have won 60% of their last five matches and averaged 2.0 points, while MTK recorded only a 20% win rate and averaged 1.4 points. The visitors more often establish a lead at the break, leading after 45 minutes in 60% of their recent appearances and averaging 1.0 goal scored in the first half; MTK score only 0.4 goals per match during this period. In addition, the seasonal data shows that Puskás won their previous match 2–0 after leading at half-time, while MTK lost 0–2 and went into the break behind. However, MTK can respond after the interval, averaging 1.4 goals in the second halves of their last five matches, which keeps the possibility of a draw at half-time followed by an away win at full-time relevant. Nevertheless, the strongest individual scenario remains Puskás leading at half-time and maintaining their winning advantage, supported by the visitors’ superior attacking efficiency: an average of 1.8 goals scored compared with 1.0 goal conceded.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
MTKPuskás
14Shots11
MTKPuskás
9Shots on target6
MTKPuskás
1.98xG1.39
MTKPuskás
8Corners4
MTKPuskás
65Dangerous attacks38
MTKPuskás
10Fouls20
MTKPuskás
2Cards4
MTKPuskás

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

3Goals scored / game1
MTKPuskás
1.5Goals allowed / game1
MTKPuskás
52%Average possession51%
MTKPuskás
5Shots on target / game4
MTKPuskás

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game10
MTKPuskás
5Shots on target4
MTKPuskás
27.3%Shot conversion10%
MTKPuskás
52%Possession51%
MTKPuskás
1.33xG for1.23
MTKPuskás
1.29xG against1.52
MTKPuskás

Shooting quality

MTK: Efficient finishingPuskás: Balanced
MTKPuskás
Accuracy (shots on target)45%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.600.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

MTK is 33% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - MTK · 1.5 pts / game - Puskás

MTK
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%
Puskás
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 200% better for: goals scored per game.

3 goals / game - MTK · 1 goals / game - Puskás

Puskás is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - MTK · 1 goals / game - Puskás

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).

Puskás scoring profile: mixed

Puskás scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).

6Goals scored (season)2
MTKPuskás
3Goals conceded (season)2
MTKPuskás
4.5Average goals per game2
MTKPuskás
6Goals scored (last 5)2
MTKPuskás
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
MTKPuskás

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
MTKPuskás
100%2 goals50%
MTKPuskás
100%3 goals0%
MTKPuskás
0%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
MTKPuskás
50%2 goals50%
MTKPuskás
50%3 goals0%
MTKPuskás
0%4 goals0%
MTKPuskás

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
MTKPuskás
50%BTTS in both halves0%
MTKPuskás
100%Scored in both halves0%
MTKPuskás

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MTKPuskás
50%BTTS - last 50%
MTKPuskás

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MTKPuskás

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
MTKPuskás
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
MTKPuskás
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MTKPuskás

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MTK - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Puskás - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.5
MTKPuskás
1Goals scored (1st half)1
MTKPuskás
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
MTKPuskás
2Average goals (1st half)1.5
MTKPuskás
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
MTKPuskás
0%No goal before half-time50%
MTKPuskás

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per game (2nd half)0.5
MTKPuskás
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
MTKPuskás
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
MTKPuskás
2.5Average goals (2nd half)0.5
MTKPuskás
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MTKPuskás
0%No goal after half-time100%
MTKPuskás

MTK - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Puskás - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

MTK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.503.00
Goals scored / game1.02.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.5
Average goals per game2.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Puskás - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.500.50
Goals scored / game1.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.50.5
Average goals per game1.50.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

MTK
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Puskás
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Puskás

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

MTKLigaPuskás
Average goals per game 4.503.75 2.00
Both teams scored 50%58% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%67% 0%
Clean sheets 50%25% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
2.33
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+64%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defensive advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
17%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
75%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PuskásGoalMartin KernAssist: Pal Dardai
  2. MTKSubstitutionOn: Csaba BelényesiOff: Ilia Beriashvili
  3. PuskásYellow cardAndrás Németh
  4. MTKYellow cardStipe Radić
  5. MTKYellow cardKrisztián László
  6. MTKSubstitutionOn: István BognárOff: Krisztián László
  7. PuskásYellow cardMartin Kern
  8. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Mikael SoisaloOff: Pal Dardai
  9. PuskásYellow cardRoland Orján
  10. PuskásYellow cardMichael Okeke
  11. PuskásSubstitutionOn: Urho NissiläOff: Laros Duarte
  12. MTKSubstitutionOn: Vilius ArmalasOff: Stipe Radić
  13. PuskásGoalLamin ColleyAssist: Urho Nissilä

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from MTK's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses against Puskás. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of MTK vs Puskás?

The NB I match finished MTK 2:3 Puskás. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MTK and Puskás?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches MTK won 0, Puskás won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MTK vs Puskás?

MTK score 3.00 goals per game on average and Puskás 1.00. The NB I average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MTK's matches and 0% of Puskás's.

What form are MTK and Puskás in?

Over the last 5 games MTK have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Puskás 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MTK vs Puskás?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.