Netherlands - Eerste DivisieData current as of September 12, 2026

MVV vs RKC Waalwijk: match statistics

MVV crest
MVV
1 : 3half-time 0:2
RKC Waalwijk crest
RKC Waalwijk

MVV vs RKC Waalwijk: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

MVV played against RKC Waalwijk in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on April 3, 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

MVV has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. RKC Waalwijk has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

MVV scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 2.00. RKC Waalwijk scores 1.70 and allows 1.52. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of MVV's games and 76% of RKC Waalwijk's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 67%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

RKC Waalwijk has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.29 per game. MVV takes 11.3 shots per game, while RKC Waalwijk takes 14.8.

First-half and second-half trends

MVV leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. RKC Waalwijk leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.85 after halftime.

When the teams score

MVV's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For RKC Waalwijk, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Eerste Divisie games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

RKC Waalwijk is the paper favorite: they have scored 56 goals this season versus MVV’s 39, and in the last 5 matches they have 11 goals compared to MVV’s 7. The visitors generate higher-quality chances — RKC’s away xG for is 1.61 with xG against 1.36, while MVV at home has xG for 1.34 and xG against 1.86, indicating a greater likelihood of clear-cut opportunities for RKC. Defensively MVV performs worse: they concede an average of 1.88 goals per home match (66 conceded this season), while RKC concedes 1.44 on the road (50 this season) and have 19% clean sheets versus MVV’s 13%. Additionally RKC attempt more shots (14.5 average and 4.88 on target away) than MVV (12.5 and 3.5), and in form RKC have 3 wins in their last 5 and average 2.0 points per game versus MVV’s 1.2. On this basis I predict an away win; suggested probability split is 18% home, 24% draw and 58% for RKC.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong BTTS signal stems from seasonal statistics: MVV has BTTS at 82%, RKC 69%, and both teams are 80% in the last 5 matches, which strongly supports both teams scoring. Both sides create goals — average goals scored 1.65 for MVV and 1.75 for RKC, xG 1.71 vs 1.61, and average shots 15.12 vs 14.5 with shots on target 5.24 vs 4.88 confirm real offensive threat. Defensively MVV is vulnerable to goals: conceding 1.59 per season and 2.2 on average in the last 5, while RKC concedes 1.44 seasonally (last 5: 1.4), which increases the likelihood that the home side will concede and both teams will score. Low clean sheet rates — 18% for MVV and 19% for RKC — and a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (65% and 69%) further support the BTTS scenario. Based on this I rate BTTS 'Yes' 80% vs 20% 'No' as the best pick, because the combination of 82%/69% seasonal BTTS, 80% in the last 5 matches and MVV's weaker defense gives a stronger signal for both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams create and concede a lot of chances: MVV scores on average 1.65 goals with xG 1.71, RKC scores 1.75 with xG 1.61; xG against are 1.45 (MVV against) and 1.36 (RKC against), yielding expected xG of 1.54 for the home side and 1.53 for the away side (total 3.07). Seasonal percentages of matches over 1.5 goals are 94% (MVV) and 88% (RKC), and BTTS percentages are 82% and 69%, so Over 1.5 looks highly likely and I assign it 92%. The 2.5 line also has solid justification: season over 2.5 is 65% for MVV and 69% for RKC (avg ~67%), and in the last 5 matches RKC had 100% over 2.5 and MVV 60%, therefore I estimate ~68% for Over 2.5. The 3.5 line is less certain: season over 3.5 is 35% (MVV) and 44% (RKC), avg ~39%, and the projected total xG 3.07 is below 3.5, so Under 3.5 has the edge. The strongest play is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over 1.5) due to very high seasonal rates 94%/88% and the expected 3.07 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the season MVV led at the break in 8 matches (47%) and scored an average of 0.88 goals by half-time, while RKC led in 7 matches (44%) with a seasonal half-time average of 0.81 goals. However, form over the last 5 fixtures clearly favors RKC: the visitors led at the break in 3 of 5 (60%) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, whereas MVV had 0 of 5 (0%) and 0.4 goals by half-time. Over the full match the seasonal averages are 1.65 goals for MVV versus 1.75 for RKC, and xG is 1.71 for the home side versus 1.61 for the visitors, indicating similar offensive potential but a form trend in favor of RKC. Additionally, RKC excel after the break: 94% of their matches have at least one goal in the second half and they win 38% of second halves, while MVV have 76% of matches with second-half goals and only 18% second-half wins, indicating an advantage for the visitors in the decisive portion of the match. Considering RKC’s 60% rate of leading in the last five and 60% win rate in those five, the most likely scenario is 2/2 (visitors leading at half-time and winning Full-Time).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
MVVRKC Waalwijk
14Shots23
MVVRKC Waalwijk
2Shots on target12
MVVRKC Waalwijk
1.38xG2.64
MVVRKC Waalwijk
7Corners8
MVVRKC Waalwijk
48Dangerous attacks50
MVVRKC Waalwijk
16Fouls12
MVVRKC Waalwijk
3Cards0
MVVRKC Waalwijk

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.18Goals scored / game1.7
MVVRKC Waalwijk
2Goals allowed / game1.52
MVVRKC Waalwijk
44%Average possession51%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
3.97Shots on target / game5.06
MVVRKC Waalwijk

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.33Shots per game14.82
MVVRKC Waalwijk
3.97Shots on target5.06
MVVRKC Waalwijk
10.4%Shot conversion11.5%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
44%Possession51%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
1.29xG for1.66
MVVRKC Waalwijk
2xG against1.41
MVVRKC Waalwijk

Shooting quality

MVV: BalancedRKC Waalwijk: Attacking
MVVRKC Waalwijk
Accuracy (shots on target)35%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

RKC Waalwijk is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - MVV · 2 pts / game - RKC Waalwijk

MVV
DDWDL
Season result split
27% W27% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-15
1.09 pts / game · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 2.18BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
RKC Waalwijk
WWWDL
Season result split
39% W27% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-11
1.45 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RKC Waalwijk is 44% better for: goals scored per game.

1.18 goals / game - MVV · 1.7 goals / game - RKC Waalwijk

RKC Waalwijk is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - MVV · 1.52 goals / game - RKC Waalwijk

MVV scoring profile: strong

MVV scores in 61% of games (20 of 33 meczów), while RKC Waalwijk keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 meczów).

RKC Waalwijk scoring profile: very strong

RKC Waalwijk scores in 91% of games (30 of 33 meczów), while MVV keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 33 meczów).

39Goals scored (season)56
MVVRKC Waalwijk
66Goals conceded (season)50
MVVRKC Waalwijk
3.18Average goals per game3.21
MVVRKC Waalwijk
7Goals scored (last 5)11
MVVRKC Waalwijk
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
MVVRKC Waalwijk

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal91%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
39%2 goals55%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
15%3 goals15%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
3%4 goals9%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal82%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
52%2 goals52%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
33%3 goals15%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
21%4 goals3%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time27%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
9%BTTS in both halves0%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
27%Scored in both halves30%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
80%BTTS - last 580%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RKC Waalwijk is 107% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / game - MVV · 1.7 pts / game - RKC Waalwijk

MVV - half-time state
12% leading45% draw42% trailing
RKC Waalwijk - half-time state
45% leading33% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per game (1st half)1.7
MVVRKC Waalwijk
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.85
MVVRKC Waalwijk
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
MVVRKC Waalwijk
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.42
MVVRKC Waalwijk
36%Clean sheet before half-time52%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
58%No goal before half-time36%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per game (2nd half)1.15
MVVRKC Waalwijk
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
MVVRKC Waalwijk
1.12Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
MVVRKC Waalwijk
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.79
MVVRKC Waalwijk
33%Clean sheet after half-time36%
MVVRKC Waalwijk
55%No goal after half-time42%
MVVRKC Waalwijk

MVV - second-half results

33% W27% D39% L
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

RKC Waalwijk - second-half results

27% W33% D39% L
56
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

MVV - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.402.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game1.62.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
RKC Waalwijk - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game1.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

MVV
ScoredConceded
7
10
0-15
6
11
16-30
3
8
31-45
7
15
46-60
7
7
61-75
9
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

RKC Waalwijk
ScoredConceded
11
3
0-15
10
8
16-30
7
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
6
61-75
13
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-69%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

MVV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

RKC Waalwijk

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

MVVLigaRKC Waalwijk
Average goals per game 3.183.19 3.21
Both teams scored 55%62% 76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%63% 67%
Clean sheets 12%21% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%77% 85%
Goal after half-time 85%85% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / game
1.50
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MVVSubstitutionOn: Lirim JashariOff: Nabil El Basri
  2. RKC WaalwijkGoalJesper Uneken
  3. MVVYellow cardSven Braken
  4. MVVYellow cardAdam Zaian
  5. RKC WaalwijkGoalHarrie KusterAssist: Loek Postma
  6. RKC WaalwijkSubstitutionOn: Rein van HedelOff: Jean-Paul Boëtius
  7. MVVSubstitutionOn: Luca FoubertOff: Lirim Jashari
  8. RKC WaalwijkGoalNazjir Held
  9. RKC WaalwijkSubstitutionOn: Navajo BakboordOff: Denilho Cleonise
  10. MVVSubstitutionOn: Thijme VerheijenOff: Ilano Silva Timas
  11. RKC WaalwijkSubstitutionOn: Tim van der LeijOff: Jesper Uneken
  12. RKC WaalwijkSubstitutionOn: Richard van der VenneOff: Harrie Kuster
  13. MVVYellow cardAdam Zaian

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Kevin PutsMatches officiated: 19
3.32Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins16%Draws37%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from MVV's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against RKC Waalwijk. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of MVV vs RKC Waalwijk?

The Eerste Divisie match finished MVV 1:3 RKC Waalwijk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before MVV vs RKC Waalwijk?

MVV score 1.18 goals per game on average and RKC Waalwijk 1.70. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 55% of MVV's matches and 76% of RKC Waalwijk's.

What form are MVV and RKC Waalwijk in?

Over the last 5 games MVV have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and RKC Waalwijk 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MVV vs RKC Waalwijk?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.