Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: match statistics
Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Naft Gachsaran played against Mes Shahr-e Babak in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on July 16, 2026. Venue: Naft Gachsaran Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Naft Gachsaran has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Mes Shahr-e Babak has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Naft Gachsaran scores 0.76 goals per game and allows 1.18. Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 1.15 and allows 0.42. Games in this league average 1.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Naft Gachsaran's games and 27% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 18%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mes Shahr-e Babak has the higher season xG average, 1.19 to 0.66 per game. Naft Gachsaran takes 0.5 shots per game, while Mes Shahr-e Babak takes 5.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Naft Gachsaran leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.36 goals per game after halftime. Mes Shahr-e Babak leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Naft Gachsaran's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Mes Shahr-e Babak, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.58 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mes Shahr-e Babak is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table with 18 wins this season versus Naft Gachsaran’s 7 wins (12th). The visitors have scored 38 and conceded only 14 goals this season, while the hosts have 25 scored and 39 conceded, and the home goal difference for the hosts is -5. In the last 5 matches Naft has scored 4 goals but conceded 13 and collected just 1 point (0.2 points per game on average), whereas Mes has also scored 4, conceded 2 and accumulated 8 points (1.6 points per game). Away, Mes averages 8.67 shots and 3.67 shots on target per match and 1.25 average goals with clean sheets in 56% of matches, while the hosts average 0.75 goals per home game and fail to score in 50% of home matches. Given the superiority in number of wins (18 vs 7), better goal differential (38-14 vs 25-39) and significantly stronger recent form, I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long signals indicate a low probability of BTTS - Yes: BTTS occurs for the home side in 29% of matches and for the away side in 25%, versus a league average of 30%. Defensive metrics point toward a clean sheet expected — Naft has 65% clean sheets, Mes Shahr-e Babak 56%, with seasonal average goals conceded of 0.35 and 0.5 per match. Short-term Naft is defensively vulnerable: in the last 5 matches they conceded 13 goals (2.6 per match) and have 40% BTTS in L5, while the visitors conceded 2 goals in L5 (0.4 per match) and have 20% BTTS. xG shows moderate scoring opportunities — home xG 1.24 vs xG against for the visitors 1.17, and away xG 1.12 vs xG against for the hosts 0.91, which does not suggest regular goal exchanges. Considering the stronger season-long signal for low BTTS and high clean sheet rates (65%/56%), I tip No Goal with a probability of 72% versus 28% for Goal/Goal (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-shots-based model projects total expected goals of 2.23: home ~1.21 (attack xG 1.24 vs opponents’ xG against 1.17) and away ~1.02 (attack xG 1.12 vs opponents’ xG against 0.91). Using a Poisson distribution this yields ~65% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~38% for minimum 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~19% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Historically both teams rarely reach >=3 goals (seasonal 18% home, 19% away), and the home side has a high clean sheet rate (65%), which limits Over 2.5 upside. Nevertheless, the number of shots on target (home 4.62, away 3.67) and the advantage in expected xG over the league average (2.23 vs 1.58) raise the probability of at least two strikes, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly point to a draw at Half-Time: both teams concede on average only 0.06 goals before the break, and the percentage of clean sheets at Half-Time is 94% for each side, so a tied score in the first half is the strongest signal. Home advantage favors the hosts over 90 minutes — 2.24 points per home match and a 65% win rate — along with superior xG numbers (1.24 vs 1.12) and lower xG against (0.91 vs 1.17), suggesting they are more likely to decide the match by Full-Time. Most goals come in the second half: hosts average 0.76 goals after the break and visitors 1.19, so the outcome is expected after the turnaround, not necessarily before Half-Time. Risk must be considered — in their last 5 matches the hosts have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, while the visitors' last 5 are 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss — therefore draw scenarios and an away win have a significant share in the probability distribution.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Gachsaran | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -40% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.27 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Naft Gachsaran · 1.6 pts / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 51% better for: goals scored per game.
0.76 goals / game - Naft Gachsaran · 1.15 goals / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 181% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.18 goals / game - Naft Gachsaran · 0.42 goals / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Naft Gachsaran scores in 58% of games (19 of 33 meczów), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 61% (20 of 33 meczów).
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 70% of games (23 of 33 meczów), while Naft Gachsaran keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Gachsaran
Over / Under - Mes Shahr-e Babak
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / game - Naft Gachsaran · 1.88 pts / game - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Gachsaran - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Naft Gachsaran
Mes Shahr-e Babak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Gachsaran | Liga | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.94 | 1.58 | • 1.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 22% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 46% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 61% | 46% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | • 58% | 57% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Naft Gachsaran's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mes Shahr-e Babak. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Gachsaran 0:2 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
Naft Gachsaran score 0.76 goals per game on average and Mes Shahr-e Babak 1.15. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Naft Gachsaran's matches and 27% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's.
What form are Naft Gachsaran and Mes Shahr-e Babak in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Gachsaran have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Mes Shahr-e Babak 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
The statistical background for Naft Gachsaran vs Mes Shahr-e Babak — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


