Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni park LendavaData current as of October 29, 2026

Nafta vs Aluminij: match statistics

Nafta crest
Nafta
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Aluminij crest
Aluminij

Nafta vs Aluminij: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nafta played against Aluminij in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on October 28, 2026. Venue: Športni park Lendava. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Nafta has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Aluminij has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Nafta scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.33. Aluminij scores 1.33 and allows 1.08. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Nafta's games and 42% of Aluminij's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 33%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nafta has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.25 per game. Nafta takes 11.3 shots per game, while Aluminij takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Nafta leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Aluminij leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nafta's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Aluminij, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

PrvaLiga games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nafta are slight favorites: they have collected 8 points and conceded just 3 goals in their last 5 matches, while Aluminij have earned 4 points and conceded 10. At home, Nafta score an average of 2 goals and register 6.33 shots on target per match, while Aluminij average 4.2 shots on target away from home. Nafta also hold the edge in chance creation, with a home xG of 1.49 compared with Aluminij’s away xG of 1.34. However, this remains an open contest, as the visitors score an average of 2.2 goals away from home and Nafta concede 1.83 goals per home match. The hosts have also won just 2 of their last 5 matches.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against both teams scoring is that Nafta failed to score in 71% of its home matches, averaging just 0.71 goals at home. Aluminij averages 2.2 goals away, but failed to score in 40% of those matches, so its goal is not guaranteed either. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by Nafta’s improved attack: it averaged 2.6 goals across its last 5 matches, while Aluminij conceded 2.0. Despite this improvement, both teams scored in only 20% of Nafta’s last 5 matches, compared with 60% for Aluminij. Therefore, it is slightly more likely that at least one team will finish the match without scoring (BTTS - No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, although the data for the two teams point in different directions on higher lines. Nafta average just 0.71 goals at home, but their xG is 1.19, while Aluminij allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.04 xG. The visitors score an average of 2.2 goals away from home, while Nafta concede 1.0 goal per home match. In their last five matches, each team averaged at least 2.6 goals, reinforcing the prediction of at least two goals. Higher lines are less certain: Over 2.5 goals landed in only 14% of Nafta's home matches, compared with 60% of Aluminij's away matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Nafta went into the break level in 71% of their home matches and did not concede in the first half in 86% of them. In their last five matches, Aluminij failed to score before the break in 80% of cases, although their average of 1.2 first-half goals in away matches means an away lead cannot be ruled out. Nafta could gain the upper hand after the break, having averaged 1.8 second-half goals across their last five matches, while Aluminij conceded an average of 1.2 over the same period. Nafta’s recent form also supports a home win: they averaged 1.6 points across their last five matches, compared with the visitors’ 0.8. However, the X/1 pick remains risky, as Aluminij averaged 2.2 goals away over the season, while Nafta averaged just 0.71 at home.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
NaftaAluminij
9Shots7
NaftaAluminij
4Shots on target3
NaftaAluminij
1.45xG1.11
NaftaAluminij
7Corners2
NaftaAluminij
82Dangerous attacks62
NaftaAluminij
5Fouls15
NaftaAluminij
2Cards3
NaftaAluminij

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.5Goals scored / game1.33
NaftaAluminij
1.33Goals allowed / game1.08
NaftaAluminij
42%Average possession43%
NaftaAluminij
4.92Shots on target / game3.42
NaftaAluminij

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.25Shots per game9.33
NaftaAluminij
4.92Shots on target3.42
NaftaAluminij
13.3%Shot conversion14.3%
NaftaAluminij
42%Possession43%
NaftaAluminij
1.39xG for1.25
NaftaAluminij
1.89xG against1.71
NaftaAluminij

Shooting quality

Nafta: Counter-attackingAluminij: Counter-attacking
NaftaAluminij
Accuracy (shots on target)44%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nafta is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Nafta · 1 pts / game - Aluminij

Nafta
WWLWD
Season result split
42% W17% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-5
1.42 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Aluminij
DWDLL
Season result split
25% W33% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-5
1.08 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Nafta · 1.33 goals / game - Aluminij

Aluminij is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - Nafta · 1.08 goals / game - Aluminij

Nafta scoring profile: very strong

Nafta scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 games), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 games).

Aluminij scoring profile: mixed

Aluminij scores in 42% of games (5 of 12 games), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 games).

18Goals scored (season)16
NaftaAluminij
16Goals conceded (season)13
NaftaAluminij
2.83Average goals per game2.42
NaftaAluminij
6Goals scored (last 5)8
NaftaAluminij
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
NaftaAluminij

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal42%
NaftaAluminij
42%2 goals33%
NaftaAluminij
25%3 goals25%
NaftaAluminij
8%4 goals17%
NaftaAluminij

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal83%
NaftaAluminij
42%2 goals25%
NaftaAluminij
17%3 goals0%
NaftaAluminij
0%4 goals0%
NaftaAluminij

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time17%
NaftaAluminij
17%BTTS in both halves0%
NaftaAluminij
25%Scored in both halves17%
NaftaAluminij

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
NaftaAluminij
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NaftaAluminij
40%BTTS - last 540%
NaftaAluminij

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
NaftaAluminij
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
NaftaAluminij
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
NaftaAluminij

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
NaftaAluminij
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
NaftaAluminij
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
NaftaAluminij

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aluminij is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / game - Nafta · 1.25 pts / game - Aluminij

Nafta - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing
Aluminij - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per game (1st half)1.25
NaftaAluminij
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.67
NaftaAluminij
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
NaftaAluminij
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.08
NaftaAluminij
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
NaftaAluminij
58%No goal before half-time67%
NaftaAluminij

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.08
NaftaAluminij
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
NaftaAluminij
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
NaftaAluminij
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
NaftaAluminij
33%Clean sheet after half-time42%
NaftaAluminij
50%No goal after half-time75%
NaftaAluminij

Nafta - second-half results

42% W25% D33% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Aluminij - second-half results

25% W33% D42% L
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nafta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.41.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Aluminij - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.60
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
7
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Aluminij
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Aluminij

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

NaftaLigaAluminij
Average goals per game▲ 2.832.67▼ 2.42
Both teams scored• 50%51%▼ 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 50%49%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 25%30%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%74%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%79%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AluminijYellow cardAnte Bekavac
  2. AluminijYellow cardDomen Zajšek
  3. NaftaYellow cardAron Matyas Dragoner
  4. AluminijSubstitutionOn: Ivijan SvržnjakOff: Matic Vrbanec
  5. AluminijYellow cardRok Schaubach

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Nafta's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Aluminij. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Nafta vs Aluminij?

The PrvaLiga match finished Nafta 0:0 Aluminij. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nafta vs Aluminij?

Nafta score 1.50 goals per game on average and Aluminij 1.33. The PrvaLiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nafta's matches and 42% of Aluminij's.

What form are Nafta and Aluminij in?

Over the last 5 games Nafta have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Aluminij 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nafta vs Aluminij?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.