Nagoya Grampus vs Machida Zelvia: match statistics
Nagoya Grampus vs Machida Zelvia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nagoya Grampus played against Machida Zelvia in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Toyota Stadium. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Nagoya Grampus has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Machida Zelvia has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Nagoya Grampus scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.60. Machida Zelvia scores 3.00 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 3.06 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Nagoya Grampus's games and 80% of Machida Zelvia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 80%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Machida Zelvia has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.64 per game. Nagoya Grampus takes 14.2 shots per game, while Machida Zelvia takes 15.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Nagoya Grampus leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Machida Zelvia leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nagoya Grampus's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Machida Zelvia, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 3.06 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Machida Zelvia remain unbeaten after four matchweeks, having collected 10 points, and have recorded 4 wins and a draw in their last five matches, while Nagoya have won only 2 of their last 5 games. The visitors are highly efficient in front of goal: they have scored 13 goals this season and average 3.33 goals per away match with a 19% shot-conversion rate, compared with Nagoya’s 1.67 goals and 9% conversion rate at home. The hosts tend to dominate possession, averaging 64%, and create good-quality chances worth 2.10 xG, but they have yet to keep a clean sheet, while their average xG conceded stands at 1.39. Machida concede just 0.67 goals per away game, have 1.12 xG against, and have kept a clean sheet in 33% of such matches. Nagoya’s home advantage and a high average of 7.33 shots on target per game could help them find the net, but the current form and Machida’s clearly superior efficiency point to an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Nagoya has recorded BTTS in 100% of its matches this season, while Machida has done so in 67%, compared with a league average of 60%. The hosts have not kept a single clean sheet and concede an average of 1.0 goals, while their xG against is a high 2.03, clearly strengthening Machida’s chances of scoring. Machida averages 3.33 goals per match, including 3.2 across its last five fixtures, so it should be able to exploit its opponent’s defensive problems. Nagoya also has attacking arguments in its favor: it produces an average of 1.61 xG and records 7.0 shots on target per match, while Machida allows opponents 1.12 xG and keeps a clean sheet in only 33% of its appearances. BTTS has occurred in 80% of Nagoya’s and 60% of Machida’s last five matches, making a goal for both teams more likely than a scenario in which at least one of them fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as both teams have surpassed this line in 100% of their league matches so far. Nagoya have yet to keep a clean sheet, while their average xG conceded stands at a high 2.03, which favors Machida’s attack, generating 1.84 xG per match. The visitors are in excellent scoring form: they have averaged 3.2 goals in their last five matches, while Nagoya have conceded 1.6 goals per game. Over 2.5 has also landed in 80% of each team’s last five appearances, but Machida’s stronger defense, conceding only 0.6 goals per match during this period, limits confidence in the higher lines. The projected total of 3.20 goals points to a clear likelihood of at least two goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Machida Zelvia have been in clearly better form: over their last five matches, they averaged 3.2 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, winning 80% of their games, while Nagoya averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, losing 60% of their matches. The visitors are already strong before the break, having led at half-time in 60% of their last five games and averaging 1.4 goals, whereas the hosts were trailing at half-time in 40% of their appearances during this period and scored just 0.6 goals. Machida’s advantage is also evident in their underlying performance: their average xG stands at 1.84, compared with opponents’ xG of 1.12, while Nagoya allow their opponents an xG of 2.03. After the break, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals in their last five matches and conceded none, reinforcing the scenario in which they maintain their lead until the final whistle. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT 2/2 result, with Machida taking the lead before half-time and winning the match overall.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nagoya Grampus | Machida Zelvia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.54 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Machida Zelvia is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Nagoya Grampus · 2.6 pts / game - Machida Zelvia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Machida Zelvia is 150% better for: goals scored per game.
1.2 goals / game - Nagoya Grampus · 3 goals / game - Machida Zelvia
Machida Zelvia is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - Nagoya Grampus · 0.8 goals / game - Machida Zelvia
Nagoya Grampus scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while Machida Zelvia keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
Machida Zelvia scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Nagoya Grampus keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nagoya Grampus
Over / Under - Machida Zelvia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Machida Zelvia is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / game - Nagoya Grampus · 1.8 pts / game - Machida Zelvia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nagoya Grampus - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Machida Zelvia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nagoya Grampus
Machida Zelvia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Nagoya Grampus | Liga | Machida Zelvia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.80 | 3.06 | ▲ 3.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 60% | 63% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 59% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 84% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Nagoya Grampus's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Machida Zelvia. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nagoya Grampus vs Machida Zelvia?
The J1 League match finished Nagoya Grampus 1:3 Machida Zelvia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nagoya Grampus and Machida Zelvia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nagoya Grampus won 0, Machida Zelvia won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nagoya Grampus vs Machida Zelvia?
Nagoya Grampus score 1.20 goals per game on average and Machida Zelvia 3.00. The J1 League average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Nagoya Grampus's matches and 80% of Machida Zelvia's.
What form are Nagoya Grampus and Machida Zelvia in?
Over the last 5 games Nagoya Grampus have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Machida Zelvia 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nagoya Grampus vs Machida Zelvia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nagoya Grampus vs Machida Zelvia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


