Namungo vs JKT Tanzania: match statistics
Namungo vs JKT Tanzania: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Namungo played against JKT Tanzania in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Namungo has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. JKT Tanzania has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Namungo scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 1.00. JKT Tanzania scores 1.06 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 1.95 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Namungo's games and 41% of JKT Tanzania's. The Over 2.5 rates are 13% and 29%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JKT Tanzania has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.16 per game. Namungo takes 6.9 shots per game, while JKT Tanzania takes 7.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Namungo leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. JKT Tanzania leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Namungo's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For JKT Tanzania, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.95 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast a win for JKT Tanzania (2) — the visitors have scored 18 goals this season compared to Namungo’s 14, and 7 wins versus the home side’s 5. In the last 5 matches JKT averaged 1.4 points per game (2-1-2), while Namungo managed only 0.4 points per game with 0 wins in five (0-2-3), which clearly favors the visitors’ form. Namungo’s home strength is their defense — 0% losses at home, an average of 0.43 goals conceded per game, 57% clean sheets and FTS 0% — this points to a low-scoring outcome on the hosts’ pitch. Chance quality is similar: home xG 1.29 versus visitors’ away xG 1.27, and comparable shot metrics (8.67 vs 9.0 and 3.33 vs 3.43 on target), but the visitors’ seasonal points advantage and recent form incline me toward their victory. Suggested probability distribution: home 20%, draw 30%, away 50%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal against BTTS comes from the league context: the league has only 32% of matches with BTTS and as many as 84% of fixtures end in a clean sheet. Seasonally Namungo records 44% BTTS and 44% clean sheets, while JKT has 38% BTTS with 50% clean sheets, suggesting that often one of the teams keeps a clean sheet. On the other hand, both teams' xG are similar (Namungo 1.24 vs JKT 1.27) and in the last 5 matches both teams have created opportunities (Namungo concedes on average 1.6 goals, JKT 1.4), but they also score little in the last 5 (Namungo 0.8, JKT 1.0) and have low shot conversion (13% and 11%). I weigh these signals in favor of BTTS - No (dominant league trend and high seasonal % of clean sheets), therefore I assign 60% to "no" and 40% to "yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives Namungo an expected 1.20 goals (1.24 attacking xG for the home side vs 1.15 defensive xG for JKT), and JKT an expected 1.08 goals (1.27 attacking xG for JKT vs 0.90 defensive xG for Namungo), producing total xG = 2.28. A Poisson distribution with λ = 2.28 translates to ~67% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~40% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~20% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal stats support Over 1.5 — Namungo have 56% of matches over 1.5 goals, JKT 63%, while BTTS rates are 44% and 38% respectively, which raises the likelihood of at least two goals. At the same time Over 2.5 percentages are lower (22% Namungo, 38% JKT) and in the last 5 matches Namungo recorded Over 2.5 in 20% of games versus 40% for JKT, so Over 2.5 is less certain. Therefore I recommend backing the Over line at 1.5 as the strongest signal — expected 2.28 goals and ~67% probability for Over 1.5 provide an edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw is most likely – the hosts led at the break in only 2 of their last 9 matches (22%), while the visitors have never led at half-time (0%), with first-half goal averages of 0.33 for Namungo vs 0.14 for JKT. In the second half the visitors are clearly more active: the away side’s average goals after the break is 1.71 versus 1.00 for the hosts, and 86% of the visitors’ matches have featured at least one goal after half-time (vs 67% for Namungo), so JKT more often effects a turnaround after the break. The full-time case also favors the visitors’ efficiency – JKT win 50% of matches versus 33% for Namungo, and in the last 5 games the hosts have 0% wins vs 40% for the visitors, indicating better form for JKT. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.24 for Namungo vs 1.27 for JKT), so JKT’s advantage is a second-half effect (more goals after the break) rather than clear dominance in chance creation. Therefore my most likely HT/FT scenario is draw/away win (X/2) at 36%; alternatives are draw/draw (26%) and home leading at half-time and full-time (1/1, 15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Namungo | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JKT Tanzania is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Namungo · 1.4 pts / game - JKT Tanzania
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JKT Tanzania is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
0.88 goals / game - Namungo · 1.06 goals / game - JKT Tanzania
JKT Tanzania is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Namungo · 0.88 goals / game - JKT Tanzania
Namungo scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).
JKT Tanzania scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 meczów), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Namungo
Over / Under - JKT Tanzania
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Namungo is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Namungo · 1 pts / game - JKT Tanzania
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Namungo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Namungo
JKT Tanzania
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Namungo | Liga | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.88 | 1.95 | • 1.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 32% | ▲ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 33% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 31% | 42% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 59% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- JKT TanzaniaGoalValentino Mashaka
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Namungo's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against JKT Tanzania. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Namungo vs JKT Tanzania?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Namungo 2:2 JKT Tanzania. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Namungo vs JKT Tanzania?
Namungo score 0.88 goals per game on average and JKT Tanzania 1.06. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Namungo's matches and 41% of JKT Tanzania's.
What form are Namungo and JKT Tanzania in?
Over the last 5 games Namungo have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and JKT Tanzania 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Namungo vs JKT Tanzania?
The statistical background for Namungo vs JKT Tanzania — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


