Náutico vs Ponte Preta: match statistics
Náutico vs Ponte Preta: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Náutico play Ponte Preta in Serie B (Brazil). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 23:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Náutico: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Ponte Preta: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Náutico scores 1.22 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Ponte Preta scores 0.67 and concedes 1.94. League average: 2.27 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Náutico 33%, Ponte Preta 50%. Over 2.5: Náutico 39%, Ponte Preta 56%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Náutico has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.21. Náutico: 16.6 shots per match, Ponte Preta: 10.7.
Match halves
Náutico: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.89. Ponte Preta: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.22.
Goals by minute
Náutico: 76-90+ (8 goals). Ponte Preta: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Ponte Preta appears a narrow favorite due to superior away efficiency: the visitors average 1.0 goal per away match and have 0% scoreless games, while Náutico averages 0.0 goals at home and 100% scoreless home matches. The visitors register on average 3 shots on target per away match versus 1 for the hosts and have a conversion rate around 10% versus 0% for Náutico, with comparable average xG per match of 1.15 (Ponte Preta) vs 1.10 (Náutico). Náutico’s defense looks stronger locally — the hosts concede 1.0 goal at home and allow 1.04 xG to opponents, whereas Ponte Preta concedes 2.0 goals away and 1.96 xG, indicating defensive vulnerabilities for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Náutico scored 7 goals and averages 1.4 points per game compared to Ponte Preta’s 4 goals and 0.8 points, showing better overall form for the hosts, but this does not translate into home finishing. Considering Ponte Preta’s advantage in creating shots on target and finishing chances and Náutico’s statistical inefficiency at home, I tip a away win for Ponte Preta.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Náutico | Ponte Preta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Náutico is 82% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Náutico · 0.67 goals / match - Ponte Preta
Náutico is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - Náutico · 1.94 goals / match - Ponte Preta
Náutico scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Ponte Preta keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
Ponte Preta scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Náutico keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Náutico
Over / Under — Ponte Preta
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Náutico is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Náutico · 0.67 pts / match - Ponte Preta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Náutico - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ponte Preta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -6 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Náutico
Ponte Preta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Náutico | Liga | Ponte Preta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.50 | 2.27 | ▲ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 31% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 66% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Náutico vs Ponte Preta?
The Serie B match finished Náutico 1:0 Ponte Preta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Náutico vs Ponte Preta?
Náutico score 1.22 goals per game on average and Ponte Preta 0.67. The Serie B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Náutico's matches and 50% of Ponte Preta's.
What form are Náutico and Ponte Preta in?
Over the last 5 games Náutico have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Ponte Preta 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Náutico vs Ponte Preta?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Náutico vs Ponte Preta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.