Navad Urmia vs Pars Jam Bushehr: match statistics
Navad Urmia vs Pars Jam Bushehr: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navad Urmia played against Pars Jam Bushehr in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Navad Urmia has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Pars Jam Bushehr has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Navad Urmia scores 0.77 goals per game and allows 0.62. Pars Jam Bushehr scores 0.92 and allows 0.85. Games in this league average 1.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Navad Urmia's games and 38% of Pars Jam Bushehr's. The Over 2.5 rates are 15% and 23%, compared with league averages of 29% for BTTS and 23% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Navad Urmia has the higher season xG average, 1.09 to 1.02 per game. Navad Urmia takes 2.0 shots per game, while Pars Jam Bushehr takes 0.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. Pars Jam Bushehr leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navad Urmia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Pars Jam Bushehr, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.50 goals. Both teams score in 29% of games, and 23% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Pars Jam Bushehr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.55 | 1.48 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 2.03 | 2.97 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pars Jam Bushehr is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
0.77 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.92 goals / game - Pars Jam Bushehr
Navad Urmia is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.62 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.85 goals / game - Pars Jam Bushehr
Navad Urmia scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while Pars Jam Bushehr keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 meczów).
Pars Jam Bushehr scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
Over / Under - Pars Jam Bushehr
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pars Jam Bushehr is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 1.54 pts / game - Pars Jam Bushehr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pars Jam Bushehr - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navad Urmia
Pars Jam Bushehr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Pars Jam Bushehr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.38 | 1.50 | ▲ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 38% | 29% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 23% | • 23% |
| Clean sheets | • 46% | 47% | • 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 38% | 43% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 62% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Pars Jam Bushehr?
The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:1 Pars Jam Bushehr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Pars Jam Bushehr?
Navad Urmia score 0.77 goals per game on average and Pars Jam Bushehr 0.92. The Azadegan League average is 1.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Navad Urmia's matches and 38% of Pars Jam Bushehr's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Pars Jam Bushehr in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pars Jam Bushehr 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Pars Jam Bushehr?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.