Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Navad Urmia played against Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on July 3, 2026. Venue: Takhti Sports Complex. Final score: 1:4.
Recent form
Navad Urmia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Sanat Naft has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Navad Urmia scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.13. Sanat Naft scores 0.97 and allows 0.65. Games in this league average 1.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's games and 39% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 26%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.09 to 0.79 per game. Navad Urmia takes 1.1 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes 4.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.27 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.74 after halftime.
When the teams score
Navad Urmia's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.54 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sanat Naft is the clear favorite: they sit 4th with 13 wins this season versus Navad Urmia’s 4, with goal difference 30-20 (+10) vs 15-34 (-19) for the hosts. The visitors create more chances — on average 7.33 shots per match with 4.33 on target and xG 1.12 against xG conceded 1.09 — while Navad have failed to score in their last 5 matches. Sanat Naft’s away defense is tighter (0.67 goals conceded per game) than the home defense’s (1.00 goals conceded), and Navad have shipped 12 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.4 per game). In the short term Sanat Naft average 1.0 point per game over the last 5, versus the hosts’ 0.2, which further favors the visitors, despite the visitors having 60% of away matches without scoring. Given the superiority in chance creation and the better season-long record, I forecast an away win while expecting a low total goal count.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - No with 70% probability (vs 30% for Yes) because season-long and recent metrics indicate an inclination toward clean sheets. Navad Urmia averages 1.31 goals this season but scored 0.0 goals in the last 5 matches with BTTS 0%, significantly reducing the hosts' likelihood to add a goal. Sanat Naft records 0.6 goals per game season-to-date and a season BTTS rate of 27%; in their last 5 matches the away side averaged 0.6 goals and had BTTS 40%, showing no consistent tendency for both teams to score. Both teams have high clean sheet shares: Navad 44% and Sanat 47%, while the league BTTS level is only 30%, favoring outcomes without both teams scoring. Although Sanat generates more shots on target (4.33 vs 2.4), their shot conversion is lower (9% vs 13%) and xG against Navad is only 0.68, so the realistic potential for both sides to score concurrently appears limited.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Navad Urmia scores an average of 1.31 goals per game with xG 1.08, while Sanat Naft scores 0.60 on average with xG 1.12; averaging the home attack and the opponent’s defense yields a forecast of 1.09 xG for Navad and 0.90 xG for Sanat, totaling 1.99 expected goals. The combined xG of both teams is 2.20, whereas the actual seasonal average goals scored is 1.91 (1.31+0.60), suggesting a match around ~2 goals. Seasonal shares of matches with over 2.5 goals are 31% for the home side and 20% for the away side, and over 3.5 occurred in only 13% of home games and 0% of away games, which reduces the likelihood of high-scoring outcomes. A Poisson model with an expected total of 1.99 goals gives about a 59% chance of at least 2 goals (over 1.5), ~32% for over 2.5 and ~14% for over 3.5; consequently the strongest and safest signal from the data is under 3.5 (≈86% chance), therefore I recommend playing under 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), because draws at the break occur very frequently — the home side draws in 81% of their matches and the visitors in 73%. Navad has the advantage over the full 90 minutes: on average 1.31 goals scored per match versus Sanat Naft’s 0.6, and an average of 2.06 points per match versus the opponents’ 1.2, which increases their chances of a win after the break. At half-time the home team scores on average 0.44 goals and the visitors 0.0, while in the second half the hosts score at least one goal in 69% of matches, indicating decisions coming after the break. The home defense concedes xG of 0.68 compared to 1.09 for the visitors, and with shot conversion rates of 13% versus 9% the hosts are more efficient; therefore I assign X/1 45% and X/X 25% as the secondary scenario, while leads for the visitors at half-time are rated very low (0% half-time leads).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Navad Urmia | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -6% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.70 | 0.26 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.86 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Navad Urmia · 1 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 94% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.97 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Sanat Naft is 74% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - Navad Urmia · 0.65 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Navad Urmia scores in 43% of games (13 of 30 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 45% (14 of 31 meczów).
Sanat Naft scores in 61% of games (19 of 31 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Navad Urmia
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Navad Urmia | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.63 | 1.54 | • 1.61 |
| Both teams scored | • 30% | 30% | ▲ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▲ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 47% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Navad Urmia's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sanat Naft. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Navad Urmia 1:4 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?
Navad Urmia score 0.50 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.97. The Azadegan League average is 1.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Navad Urmia's matches and 39% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Navad Urmia and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Navad Urmia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sanat Naft 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft?
The statistical background for Navad Urmia vs Sanat Naft — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


