Nesebar vs Rilski Sportist: match statistics
Nesebar vs Rilski Sportist: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nesebar played against Rilski Sportist in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Gradski stadion. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Nesebar has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Rilski Sportist has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Nesebar scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.43. Rilski Sportist scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Nesebar's games and 57% of Rilski Sportist's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nesebar has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.56 per game. Nesebar takes 12.4 shots per game, while Rilski Sportist takes 12.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Nesebar leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Rilski Sportist leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nesebar's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Rilski Sportist, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nesebar sit 6th, while Rilski Sportist are only 16th, and the hosts have won 3 of their 6 matches this season, with just one draw. At home, Nesebar average 2.75 goals, 17.33 shots and 8.33 shots on target per match, comfortably outperforming the visitors’ away average of just 0.33 goals. The hosts also create chances worth 2.02 xG, while Rilski Sportist’s defense allows opponents 2.08 xG away from home, despite conceding only 0.67 goals statistically. The visitors have won none of their three away fixtures, drawing two, and failed to score in 67% of such matches, significantly limiting their chances of an upset. Nesebar are also in better form, scoring 12 goals in their last five matches and recording 3 victories during that period.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Rilski Sportist’s very poor finishing: the visitors score an average of just 0.33 goals per match and have failed to score in 67% of their games. Nesebar have yet to keep a clean sheet, but their defense has improved in the last five matches, conceding only 0.8 goals per game, with 1.17 xG allowed to opponents. The hosts are clearly more productive, averaging 1.33 goals this season and 2.4 over their last five matches, making a one-sided scoring outcome the most likely scenario. The teams’ season BTTS rates stand at 67% and 33% respectively, but the visitors’ low attacking output and the league BTTS average of 47% shift the assessment in favor of BTTS - No. Although Rilski create an average of 1.54 xG, they convert only 3% of their shots, compared with Nesebar’s 9%, which limits their chances of breaching the hosts’ defense.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Nesebar are in very good attacking form: they have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 per game, with an xG of 1.95. The hosts create an average of 1.76 xG, while Rilski Sportist allow opponents as much as 2.08 xG away from home, significantly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The visitors score only 0.33 goals away from home this season, but their last 5 matches have produced an average of 1.0 goal, meaning they could make a limited contribution to the scoreline. Over 1.5 goals has landed in 67% of Nesebar’s matches, while even with Rilski’s more cautious profile, the hosts’ superior chance quality should be enough to surpass this line. The Over 2.5 line remains more balanced, as Rilski have so far seen 100% of their away matches finish below 2.5 goals; therefore, Over 1.5 goals is the safest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nesebar have been clearly stronger across their last five matches: they won 60% of their games, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.8, while Rilski Sportist won 20% of their matches and scored 1.0 goal per game. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their recent matches, averaging 1.2 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded in the first halves; the visitors have not once gone into half-time with the lead and conceded an average of 0.8 goals before the break. Nesebar’s qualitative advantage is also evident in the xG figures: 1.76 in attack compared with the 2.08 xG conceded on average by Rilski Sportist. After the interval, the hosts continue to average 1.2 goals across their last five appearances, making a Nesebar lead at half-time followed by a full-time victory the most likely HT/FT scenario: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nesebar | Rilski Sportist | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nesebar is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Nesebar · 1.8 pts / game - Rilski Sportist
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nesebar is 86% better for: goals scored per game.
1.86 goals / game - Nesebar · 1 goals / game - Rilski Sportist
Rilski Sportist is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Nesebar · 1 goals / game - Rilski Sportist
Nesebar scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Rilski Sportist keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
Rilski Sportist scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while Nesebar keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nesebar
Over / Under - Rilski Sportist
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nesebar is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / game - Nesebar · 1 pts / game - Rilski Sportist
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nesebar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Rilski Sportist - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nesebar
Rilski Sportist
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Nesebar | Liga | Rilski Sportist | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.29 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 46% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 43% | 41% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 30% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 62% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Rilski SportistGoalIliya Dimitrov
- NesebarGoalStefan Yanev Statev
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Nesebar vs Rilski Sportist?
The Second League match finished Nesebar 2:1 Rilski Sportist. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nesebar vs Rilski Sportist?
Nesebar score 1.86 goals per game on average and Rilski Sportist 1.00. The Second League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Nesebar's matches and 57% of Rilski Sportist's.
What form are Nesebar and Rilski Sportist in?
Over the last 5 games Nesebar have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Rilski Sportist 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nesebar vs Rilski Sportist?
The statistical background for Nesebar vs Rilski Sportist — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


