United States - USL ChampionshipStadion PatriotData current as of 23 July 2026

New Mexico United vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

New Mexico United vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

New Mexico United play Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 03:00. Venue: Stadion Patriot. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

New Mexico United: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

New Mexico United scores 1.36 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: New Mexico United 50%, Charleston Battery 50%. Over 2.5: New Mexico United 50%, Charleston Battery 56%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.33. New Mexico United: 11.9 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 13.1.

Match halves

New Mexico United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

New Mexico United: 61-75 (6 goals). Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the home win (1) due to a clear offensive edge at home: New Mexico United average 2.0 goals per home game and 5.5 shots on target per match, while Charleston average only 0.5 goals away and 2.75 shots on target. The efficiency gap is significant — home conversion is 14% versus 6% for the visitors, and the share of goalless matches is 25% for New Mexico compared to 75% for Charleston on the road. xG analysis shows hosts have home xG 1.59 with xG against 1.77 and in practice they convert that into 2.0 goals on average, whereas visitors have away xG 1.17 and actually score 0.5 goals, indicating major finishing inefficiency. Recent form is mixed: Charleston have a better overall last-5 record (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss, 11 goals scored and 2.0 points per game), but they concede 2.0 goals per away match and have a -6 goal differential on the road, while New Mexico in their last 5 have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses with a 7-9 goal record and 1.4 points per game. Considering the higher number of shots on target (5.5 vs 2.75), superior conversion (14% vs 6%) and the high risk of visitor inefficiency away, I assign 60% probability to a home win, 25% to a draw and 15% to a Charleston victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
12Shots13
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
5Shots on target5
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.4xG1.57
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
4Corners6
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
41Dangerous attacks56
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
17Fouls8
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
5Cards2
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.36Goals scored / match1.94
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.07Goals conceded / match1.38
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
54%Average possession56%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
4.29Shots on target / match5.44
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.86Shots per match13.06
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
4.29Shots on target5.44
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
11.4%Shot conversion14.8%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
54%Possession56%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.33xG for1.61
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.58xG against1.27
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

New Mexico United: BalancedCharleston Battery: Efficient finishing
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

New Mexico United is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - New Mexico United · 2 pts / match - Charleston Battery

New Mexico United
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W21% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-4
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - New Mexico United · 1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery

New Mexico United is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - New Mexico United · 1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery

New Mexico United scoring profile: very strong

New Mexico United scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: strong

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while New Mexico United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

19Goals scored (season)31
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
15Goals conceded (season)22
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
2.43Average goals in match3.31
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
8Goals scored (last 5)15
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal69%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
36%2 goals56%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
21%3 goals31%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
7%4 goals25%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal81%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
29%2 goals38%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
7%3 goals13%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
0%4 goals6%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
New Mexico United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 14 matches
50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time13%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
0%BTTS in both halves6%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
14%Scored in both halves38%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
60%BTTS - last 580%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - New Mexico United · 1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery

New Mexico United - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.69
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.94
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.38
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
57%Clean sheet before half-time69%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
57%No goal before half-time56%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1.56
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.94
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
50%Clean sheet after half-time31%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery
57%No goal after half-time38%
New Mexico UnitedCharleston Battery

New Mexico United - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New Mexico United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

New Mexico United
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
6
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

New Mexico United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

New Mexico UnitedLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match 2.432.79 3.31
Both teams scored 50%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 56%
Clean sheets 29%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 71%80% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): New Mexico United 0 - 0 - 2 Charleston Battery. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

New Mexico United
1 : 2
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
4 : 0
New Mexico United

FAQ

What was the result of New Mexico United vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished New Mexico United 1:0 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between New Mexico United and Charleston Battery?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches New Mexico United won 0, Charleston Battery won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before New Mexico United vs Charleston Battery?

New Mexico United score 1.36 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.94. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of New Mexico United's matches and 50% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are New Mexico United and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games New Mexico United have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Charleston Battery 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New Mexico United vs Charleston Battery?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for New Mexico United vs Charleston Battery: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.