Nice vs Lens: match statistics
Nice vs Lens: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nice played against Lens in Ligue 1 (France). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Nice has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Lens has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Nice scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.84. Lens scores 2.00 and allows 1.07. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Nice's games and 53% of Lens's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 70%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lens has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.23 per game. Nice takes 11.0 shots per game, while Lens takes 16.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Nice leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Lens leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.23 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nice's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Lens, it is minutes 46-60 (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligue 1 games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2) because Lens sit 2nd in the table with 20 wins this season versus Nice’s 7. In their last 5 matches Lens have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 15 goals (3.0 per match) and averaging 2.0 points per match; Nice in that period have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 5 goals (1.0 per match) and 1.2 points per match. Offensively on the road Lens average 1.73 goals and xG 1.6 with a 12% conversion rate and 4.8 shots on target, while Nice at home average 1.2 goals, xG 1.36, 9% conversion and 4.53 shots on target, indicating superior chance quality and finishing for the visitors. Defensively Nice concede 1.73 goals at home and have 57 goals conceded this season, whereas Lens concede 1.4 goals away and 32 overall, so the visitors are more stable at the back; additionally Nice fail to score in 33% of home matches and Lens fail to score in 27% of away matches, which leaves a minimal probability of a goalless outcome. Considering the advantage in results, last-5 form and chance quality (xG and conversion), I assess Lens’s win probability at 65%, draw 20% and Nice win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season statistics show Nice have BTTS in 47% of home matches, while Lens have BTTS in 60% of away matches (league average 50%). In the last 5 fixtures these rates rise to 60% for Nice and 80% for Lens, indicating a clear trend toward both teams scoring. Lens have scored 15 goals in their last 5 matches (3.0 per game) with an average xG of 2.48, whereas Nice have scored 5 goals in their last 5 (1.0 per game) and faced an average xG against of 1.74, so the visitors are creating more chances than the home side can shut down. Additionally, Nice score 2.27 goals at home seasonally and keep 47% clean sheets at home, while Lens have only 20% clean sheets away and a seasonal scoring average of 1.73, all of which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Based on this I assign BTTS 65% vs 35% and select "yes" as the most probable outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals from xG: Nice has 1.96 xG at home, while Lens concedes 1.36 xG away — this translates to about 1.66 expected goals for Nice. Conversely Lens has 1.60 xG away, and Nice concedes 1.10 xG at home, giving about 1.35 for Lens and a total of 3.01 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.01 yields roughly an 80% probability for Over 1.5 (P(≤1)≈19.8%), about 58% for Over 2.5 (P(≤2)≈42.1%) and about 36% for Over 3.5 (P(≤3)≈64.5%). Seasonal rates confirm the direction: Nice at home has 73% of matches >1.5 and 67% >2.5, while Lens away has 93% >1.5 and 73% >2.5; additionally in the last 5 matches Lens scored 15 goals (3.0 avg) and had average attacking xG of 2.48, which increases goal probability. At the same time Nice has 47% clean sheets at home and in the last 5 matches scores 1.0 goals on average (recent attacking xG 0.91), so the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5 and I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nice led at half-time in 7 home matches (47%) and averages 0.87 goals scored and 0.47 conceded by the break, indicating home control in the first 45 minutes. Over full home matches Nice wins 87% and scores 2.27 goals per game on average, while Lens away averages 1.73 goals and concedes 1.4, so Nice’s advantage persists across the full 90 minutes. The difference is confirmed by xG — Nice 1.96 versus Lens 1.6 — and a higher number of on-target shots for the hosts (6.27 vs 4.8), suggesting more scoring opportunities. Additionally Nice has 60% clean sheets at half-time and more often maintains a lead than Lens (47% HT for Nice vs 33% HT for Lens), therefore the scenario of a home lead at the break and a home win at full-time (1/1) is most likely. I assign 1/1 the highest probability (42%), with alternatives X/1 (20%) and X/X (10%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nice | Lens | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lens is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Nice · 1.4 pts / game - Lens
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lens is 77% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Nice · 2 goals / game - Lens
Lens is 72% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.84 goals / game - Nice · 1.07 goals / game - Lens
Nice scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Lens keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
Lens scores in 83% of games (25 of 30 meczów), while Nice keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nice
Over / Under - Lens
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lens is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Nice · 1.5 pts / game - Lens
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nice - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 23%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Lens - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nice
Lens
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| Nice | Liga | Lens | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.97 | 2.83 | ▲ 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 52% | 53% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 29% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 78% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Nice's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Lens. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nice vs Lens?
The Ligue 1 match finished Nice 1:1 Lens. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nice vs Lens?
Nice score 1.13 goals per game on average and Lens 2.00. The Ligue 1 average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Nice's matches and 53% of Lens's.
What form are Nice and Lens in?
Over the last 5 games Nice have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Lens 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nice vs Lens?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nice vs Lens: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


