Estonia - MeistriliigaHiiu staadionData current as of 23 July 2026

Nõmme Kalju vs Paide: match statistics

Nõmme Kalju crest
Nõmme Kalju
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Paide crest
Paide

Nõmme Kalju vs Paide: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nõmme Kalju play Paide in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match date is 14 June 2026 at 13:30. Venue: Hiiu staadion. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Nõmme Kalju: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Paide: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nõmme Kalju scores 1.65 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Paide scores 1.60 and concedes 1.40. League average: 3.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nõmme Kalju 50%, Paide 70%. Over 2.5: Nõmme Kalju 40%, Paide 55%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Nõmme Kalju has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.65. Nõmme Kalju: 15.0 shots per match, Paide: 13.7.

Match halves

Nõmme Kalju: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.90. Paide: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Nõmme Kalju: 61-75 (9 goals). Paide: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 0-3-3. Average goals 2.17, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the home win (1): Nõmme Kalju, currently 2nd, averages 2.29 goals scored at home and only 0.86 conceded, while Paide (4th) averages 2.00 scored and 1.57 conceded on the road. Form difference is clear over the last five matches: Kalju has 3 wins, 7 goals for and 4 against, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Paide has only 1 win, 6 goals scored, 12 conceded and 0.8 points per game. Quality-of-chances analysis confirms this: average xG for Kalju is 1.94 vs 1.65 for Paide, and xG against is 1.24 vs 1.51, indicating a home advantage in chance creation and limitation. Kalju also attempts more shots (16.57 vs 13.71) and more shots on target (5.86 vs 5.14) with similar finishing rates (14% vs 15%), so a higher volume of chances works in their favor. Considering a more stable home defense, superior xG metrics and recent form, I assess probabilities at 65% for the home win, 20% for a draw and 15% for a Paide win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Nõmme KaljuPaide
12Shots19
Nõmme KaljuPaide
8Shots on target4
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.69xG2.1
Nõmme KaljuPaide
4Corners4
Nõmme KaljuPaide
52Dangerous attacks88
Nõmme KaljuPaide
16Fouls14
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5Cards4
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.65Goals scored / match1.6
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.8Goals conceded / match1.4
Nõmme KaljuPaide
53%Average possession54%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5.05Shots on target / match4.35
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match13.7
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5.05Shots on target4.35
Nõmme KaljuPaide
11%Shot conversion11.7%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
53%Possession54%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.79xG for1.65
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.4xG against1.59
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Shooting quality

Nõmme Kalju: AttackingPaide: Balanced
Nõmme KaljuPaide
Accuracy (shots on target)34%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paide is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 2 pts / match - Paide

Nõmme Kalju
LDDWD
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-5
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Paide
WWDWL
Season result split
45% W25% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-6
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nõmme Kalju is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.4 goals / match - Paide

Nõmme Kalju scoring profile: very strong

Nõmme Kalju scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

Paide scoring profile: very strong

Paide scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Nõmme Kalju keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

33Goals scored (season)32
Nõmme KaljuPaide
16Goals conceded (season)28
Nõmme KaljuPaide
2.45Average goals in match3
Nõmme KaljuPaide
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Nõmme KaljuPaide

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal90%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
35%2 goals45%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
20%3 goals20%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
10%4 goals5%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
15%2 goals35%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5%3 goals15%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0%4 goals5%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time30%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0%BTTS in both halves10%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
25%Scored in both halves40%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
80%BTTS - last 580%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nõmme Kalju is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.55 pts / match - Paide

Nõmme Kalju - half-time state
45% leading40% draw15% trailing
Paide - half-time state
35% leading50% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)1.55
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.45
Nõmme KaljuPaide
70%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
50%No goal before half-time40%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

After half-time (2nd half)

1.55Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.55
Nõmme KaljuPaide
60%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
40%No goal after half-time30%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Nõmme Kalju - second-half results

40% W35% R25% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paide - second-half results

40% W30% R30% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nõmme Kalju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Paide - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.2
Average goals in match2.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nõmme Kalju
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
8
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
9
2
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Paide
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
5
6
16-30
6
3
31-45
5
0
46-60
5
6
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nõmme Kalju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Nõmme KaljuLigaPaide
Average goals in match 2.453.11 3.00
Both teams scored 50%58% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%66% 55%
Clean sheets 40%23% 20%
Goal before half-time 65%74% 65%
Goal after half-time 80%88% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.11
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Nõmme Kalju 0 - 3 - 3 Paide. Average goals 2.17, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Nõmme Kalju
1 : 1
Paide
Paide
1 : 0
Nõmme Kalju
Nõmme Kalju FC
1 : 1
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
1 : 1
Nõmme Kalju FC
Nõmme Kalju FC
0 : 2
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
4 : 0
Nõmme Kalju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Nõmme Kalju vs Paide?

The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme Kalju 1:1 Paide. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nõmme Kalju and Paide?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Nõmme Kalju won 0, Paide won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme Kalju vs Paide?

Nõmme Kalju score 1.65 goals per game on average and Paide 1.60. The Meistriliiga average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nõmme Kalju's matches and 70% of Paide's.

What form are Nõmme Kalju and Paide in?

Over the last 5 games Nõmme Kalju have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Paide 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme Kalju vs Paide?

The statistical background for Nõmme Kalju vs Paide — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.