Estonia - MeistriliigaHiiu staadionData current as of September 06, 2026

Nõmme Kalju vs Paide: match statistics

Nõmme Kalju crest
Nõmme Kalju
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Paide crest
Paide

Nõmme Kalju vs Paide: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nõmme Kalju played against Paide in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The game was played on June 14, 2026. Venue: Hiiu staadion. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Nõmme Kalju has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Paide has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Nõmme Kalju scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 0.71. Paide scores 1.57 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 36% of Nõmme Kalju's games and 64% of Paide's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 57%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nõmme Kalju has the higher season xG average, 1.83 to 1.54 per game. Nõmme Kalju takes 15.4 shots per game, while Paide takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Nõmme Kalju leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Paide leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.79 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nõmme Kalju's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Paide, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Meistriliiga games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1): Nõmme Kalju, currently 2nd, averages 2.29 goals scored at home and only 0.86 conceded, while Paide (4th) averages 2.00 scored and 1.57 conceded on the road. Form difference is clear over the last five matches: Kalju has 3 wins, 7 goals for and 4 against, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Paide has only 1 win, 6 goals scored, 12 conceded and 0.8 points per game. Quality-of-chances analysis confirms this: average xG for Kalju is 1.94 vs 1.65 for Paide, and xG against is 1.24 vs 1.51, indicating a home advantage in chance creation and limitation. Kalju also attempts more shots (16.57 vs 13.71) and more shots on target (5.86 vs 5.14) with similar finishing rates (14% vs 15%), so a higher volume of chances works in their favor. Considering a more stable home defense, superior xG metrics and recent form, I assess probabilities at 65% for the home win, 20% for a draw and 15% for a Paide win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have high season BTTS rates: Nõmme Kalju 57% and Paide 71%, versus a league average of 52%, which is a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. Paide scores an average of 2.0 goals per game, has xG 1.65 and 5.14 shots on target, and conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per game) with BTTS in 80% of those games, indicating a high probability of both scoring and conceding. Nõmme Kalju seasonally scores 1.14 and concedes 1.14 with 29% clean sheets, while in the last 5 matches they concede only 0.8 per game, which weakens the BTTS signal from the home side. Combined xG for both teams is around 3.08 (1.43 + 1.65), compared to a league average of 3.17, and Paide holds a clear advantage in shots on target (5.14 vs 3.29) and conversion rate (15% vs 10%), therefore the Goal/Goal scenario appears more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for the fixture is 3.09 (home: xG_for 1.43 vs away defense xG_against 1.51 → expected 1.47; away: xG_for 1.65 vs home defense xG_against 1.59 → expected 1.62), which is clearly above the 2.5 threshold. Seasonal metrics confirm an offensive profile: the home side scores 1.14 goals on average and has 43% of matches Over 2.5, while the away side scores 2.00 goals and has 71% of matches Over 2.5; the league averages 3.17 goals per game. Both teams also show high BTTS rates: home 57% and away 71%, and in their last 5 matches the home team scored 7 and conceded 4 (1.4 and 0.8 per game), whereas the away team scored 6 and conceded 12 (1.2 and 2.4), indicating open games with multiple goals. Based on this I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at 92% and Over 2.5 at 74%, because the expected 3.09 goals and the away side’s high Over2.5 frequency (71%) provide a strong signal for Over 2.5. I treat Over 3.5 as less certain (46%), since although the away side has 71% of matches above 3.5, the combined xG of 3.09 is below 3.5. Recommendation: bet Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I predict a half-time draw and a Paide win in the match (X/2), because Paide holds a clear offensive edge: they average 2.00 goals per game this season versus Kalju’s 1.14, with xG 1.65 versus 1.43. The visitors also have more shots on target (5.14 vs 3.29) and better conversion (15% vs 10%), and they average 1.00 goals by the break compared to the opponents’ 0.57; in the last 5 matches Paide registered 9 first-half goals (1.8 average). Kalju, however, have been in good form recently (3 wins in 5 matches, 60% win rate) and have kept a first-half clean sheet in 80% of their last 5 games, which supports the half-time draw scenario. The second half favors the visitors — Paide have scored at least one goal after the break in 100% of their away matches (over05_2hg_percentage_away 100.0) and average 2.29 goals in second halves away (AVG_2hg_away 2.29), so I expect a turnaround after the break in Paide’s favor. Additionally, BTTS rates (57% for Kalju, 71% for Paide) confirm both teams frequently find the net this season, increasing the likelihood that the HT draw will be broken.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

39Possession (%)61
Nõmme KaljuPaide
12Shots19
Nõmme KaljuPaide
8Shots on target4
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.69xG2.1
Nõmme KaljuPaide
4Corners4
Nõmme KaljuPaide
52Dangerous attacks88
Nõmme KaljuPaide
16Fouls14
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5Cards4
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.86Goals scored / game1.57
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.71Goals allowed / game1.36
Nõmme KaljuPaide
55%Average possession54%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5Shots on target / game4.21
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.36Shots per game12.79
Nõmme KaljuPaide
5Shots on target4.21
Nõmme KaljuPaide
12.1%Shot conversion12.3%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
55%Possession54%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.83xG for1.54
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.18xG against1.55
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Shooting quality

Nõmme Kalju: DominantPaide: Balanced
Nõmme KaljuPaide
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nõmme Kalju is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Nõmme Kalju · 0.8 pts / game - Paide

Nõmme Kalju
WLWWL
Season result split
64% W7% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-4
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Paide
LWLLD
Season result split
43% W21% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-5
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nõmme Kalju is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.86 goals / game - Nõmme Kalju · 1.57 goals / game - Paide

Nõmme Kalju is 92% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.71 goals / game - Nõmme Kalju · 1.36 goals / game - Paide

Nõmme Kalju scoring profile: very strong

Nõmme Kalju scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 meczów).

Paide scoring profile: strong

Paide scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while Nõmme Kalju keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)22
Nõmme KaljuPaide
10Goals conceded (season)19
Nõmme KaljuPaide
2.57Average goals per game2.93
Nõmme KaljuPaide
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Nõmme KaljuPaide
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Nõmme KaljuPaide

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal86%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
43%2 goals43%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
21%3 goals21%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
14%4 goals7%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal79%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
14%2 goals43%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
7%3 goals14%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0%4 goals0%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time21%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0%BTTS in both halves14%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
36%Scored in both halves36%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
20%BTTS - last 560%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nõmme Kalju is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.79 pts / game - Nõmme Kalju · 1.64 pts / game - Paide

Nõmme Kalju - half-time state
50% leading29% draw21% trailing
Paide - half-time state
36% leading57% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.79Points per game (1st half)1.64
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.79
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.14
Nõmme KaljuPaide
71%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
50%No goal before half-time43%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

After half-time (2nd half)

1.93Points per game (2nd half)1.14
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Nõmme KaljuPaide
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Nõmme KaljuPaide
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.79
Nõmme KaljuPaide
71%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Nõmme KaljuPaide
29%No goal after half-time36%
Nõmme KaljuPaide

Nõmme Kalju - second-half results

57% W21% R21% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Paide - second-half results

29% W29% R43% P
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nõmme Kalju - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Paide - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.20
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nõmme Kalju
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
8
1
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Paide
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
4
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nõmme Kalju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Nõmme KaljuLigaPaide
Average goals per game 2.573.16 2.93
Both teams scored 36%53% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%66% 57%
Clean sheets 50%25% 21%
Goal before half-time 71%73% 57%
Goal after half-time 86%92% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardRoko Vukušić
  2. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardNikita Ivanov
  3. PaideGoalHenri AnierAssist: Daniel Luts
  4. Nõmme KaljuSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim JabirOff: Mattias Männilaan
  5. PaideYellow cardSiim Luts
  6. Nõmme KaljuSubstitutionOn: Tiago Azevedo BaptistaOff: Aleksandr Nikolajev
  7. PaideSubstitutionOn: Henrik OjamaaOff: Daniel Luts
  8. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardDanyl Mashchenko
  9. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardRoko Vukušić
  10. PaideYellow cardModou Sohna
  11. Nõmme KaljuYellow cardBogdan Vaštšuk

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Nõmme Kalju's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses against Paide. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

Paide
1 : 0
Nõmme Kalju
Nõmme Kalju FC
1 : 1
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
1 : 1
Nõmme Kalju FC
Nõmme Kalju FC
0 : 2
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
4 : 0
Nõmme Kalju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Nõmme Kalju vs Paide?

The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme Kalju 1:1 Paide. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nõmme Kalju and Paide?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Nõmme Kalju won 0, Paide won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme Kalju vs Paide?

Nõmme Kalju score 1.86 goals per game on average and Paide 1.57. The Meistriliiga average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Nõmme Kalju's matches and 64% of Paide's.

What form are Nõmme Kalju and Paide in?

Over the last 5 games Nõmme Kalju have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Paide 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme Kalju vs Paide?

The statistical background for Nõmme Kalju vs Paide — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.