NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers: match statistics
NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
NY Cosmos played against Richmond Kickers in USL League One (United States). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: MCU Park. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
NY Cosmos has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Richmond Kickers has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
NY Cosmos scores 1.23 goals per game and allows 2.00. Richmond Kickers scores 0.96 and allows 2.04. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of NY Cosmos's games and 54% of Richmond Kickers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 54%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
NY Cosmos has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.42 per game. NY Cosmos takes 12.9 shots per game, while Richmond Kickers takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
NY Cosmos leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Richmond Kickers leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
NY Cosmos's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Richmond Kickers, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
NY Cosmos have a slight home advantage: they win 33% of their home fixtures, while Richmond Kickers win just 8% of their away matches and lose as many as 85%. The hosts average 1.17 goals at their own stadium with an xG of 1.66, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents an xG of 2.00 and concedes an average of 2.85 goals away from home. Richmond have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, and fail to score in 38% of their away fixtures; Cosmos have the same issue in only 17% of their home games. Both teams are in similarly poor current form, with a record of 1 win, 1 draw, and 3 defeats in their last five matches, but the visitors have lost 13 of their last 15 away games. Cosmos’ weak defense, conceding 1.50 goals per game at home, leaves room for a closely contested match, but the data points more clearly toward a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Richmond’s poor current attacking form, having scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches—an average of 0.4 per game—with both teams scoring in only 20% of those fixtures. The visitors have failed to score in 38% of their matches this season, while their average xG across the last five games is just 1.00, compared with NY Cosmos’ 1.72 xG. The hosts should have a good chance of scoring, as Richmond concede an average of 2.85 goals per game and have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches. Although Cosmos have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches, both teams’ season BTTS rate stands at 54%, below the league average of 60%, reinforcing the scenario in which at least one side fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
NY Cosmos average 1.65 xG and 4.69 shots on target per match, while Richmond concede as many as 2.85 goals and 2.00 xG on average, significantly raising the hosts’ projected goal tally. However, the visitors are offensively limited: they have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.4 per game, with an average xG of 1.00. Richmond have had at least three goals in 69% of their matches this season, but NY Cosmos have exceeded that line in only 38% of games, and the hosts have never conceded more than two goals in a single match. The projected total of 2.70 goals suggests a realistic chance of a 2:0, 2:1 or 1:1 result, but the visitors’ weaker recent finishing limits the likelihood of four goals. Therefore, the strongest selection is Under 3.5 goals, also supported by the fact that 85% of NY Cosmos matches have ended with a maximum of three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
NY Cosmos possess a clear attacking edge: their average xG stands at 1.65 compared with Richmond’s 1.19, while the hosts average 4.69 shots on target per match against 2.92 for their opponents. Richmond concede an average of as many as 2.85 goals per game, including 1.62 before half-time, whereas Cosmos have taken a lead at the break in 25% of their matches, compared with just 8% for the visitors. In their last five appearances, Richmond have failed to score a single first-half goal, while Cosmos have averaged 0.60 goals in this phase. The hosts’ advantage should persist after the break, as they concede just 0.25 goals in second halves, whereas the Kickers allow opponents to score 1.23 goals. The scenario of Cosmos leading at half-time and securing a full-time victory is therefore most strongly supported by Richmond’s defensive weaknesses and limited attacking efficiency.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| NY Cosmos | Richmond Kickers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
NY Cosmos is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - NY Cosmos · 0.2 pts / game - Richmond Kickers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
NY Cosmos is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.23 goals / game - NY Cosmos · 0.96 goals / game - Richmond Kickers
NY Cosmos scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 games), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 games).
Richmond Kickers scores in 65% of games (17 of 26 games), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - NY Cosmos
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
NY Cosmos is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.77 pts / game - NY Cosmos · 0.73 pts / game - Richmond Kickers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
NY Cosmos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -9 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
NY Cosmos
Richmond Kickers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| NY Cosmos | Liga | Richmond Kickers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.23 | 2.97 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 60% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 74% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 81% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from NY Cosmos's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Richmond Kickers. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers?
The USL League One match finished NY Cosmos 3:2 Richmond Kickers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers?
NY Cosmos score 1.23 goals per game on average and Richmond Kickers 0.96. The USL League One average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 65% of NY Cosmos's matches and 54% of Richmond Kickers's.
What form are NY Cosmos and Richmond Kickers in?
Over the last 5 games NY Cosmos have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Richmond Kickers 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers?
The statistical background for NY Cosmos vs Richmond Kickers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


