Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of September 13, 2026

Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics

Omonia 29is Maiou crest
Omonia 29is Maiou
1 : 0half-time 1:0
MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
165%(1.28)
X22%(4.75)
213%(8.45)

Omonia 29is Maiou displays significantly better form and statistics in home matches. The hosts have won 40% of their home games, scoring an average of 2.1 goals per match while conceding just 1.3. Their advantage in expected goals (xG 1.72 vs 1.13) and shot conversion rate (21%) indicate offensive superiority. MEAP Nisou has poor form in the last five matches (only 0.8 points per match) and concedes an average of 1.4 goals in away games. The difference in goal difference (+8 for the hosts at home vs -2 for the visitors away) further confirms Omonia's advantage. Considering all factors, a victory for the hosts is the most likely scenario.

Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Omonia 29is Maiou played against MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Omonia 29is Maiou has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. MEAP Nisou has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Omonia 29is Maiou scores 1.95 goals per game and allows 1.05. MEAP Nisou scores 1.05 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of Omonia 29is Maiou's games and 48% of MEAP Nisou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 48%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Omonia 29is Maiou has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.47 per game. Omonia 29is Maiou takes 8.9 shots per game, while MEAP Nisou takes 8.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Omonia 29is Maiou leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.43 after halftime.

When the teams score

Omonia 29is Maiou's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). For MEAP Nisou, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 7.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Omonia 29is Maiou displays significantly better form and statistics in home matches. The hosts have won 40% of their home games, scoring an average of 2.1 goals per match while conceding just 1.3. Their advantage in expected goals (xG 1.72 vs 1.13) and shot conversion rate (21%) indicate offensive superiority. MEAP Nisou has poor form in the last five matches (only 0.8 points per match) and concedes an average of 1.4 goals in away games. The difference in goal difference (+8 for the hosts at home vs -2 for the visitors away) further confirms Omonia's advantage. Considering all factors, a victory for the hosts is the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
-1Shots-1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
-1Shots on target-1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0xG0
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
-1Corners-1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0Dangerous attacks0
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
-1Fouls-1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
-1Cards-1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
1.95Goals scored / game1.05
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
1.05Goals allowed / game1.67
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
40%Average possession44%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
3.52Shots on target / game3.24
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.86Shots per game8.29
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
3.52Shots on target3.24
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
22%Shot conversion12.6%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
40%Possession44%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
1.66xG for1.47
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0.95xG against1.54
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

Omonia 29is Maiou: Counter-attackingMEAP Nisou: Counter-attacking
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.550.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Omonia 29is Maiou is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 0.8 pts / game - MEAP Nisou

Omonia 29is Maiou
DWLWW
Season result split
48% W33% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-4
1.76 pts / game · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 0.74BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
MEAP Nisou
LLLWD
Season result split
33% W19% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-10
1.19 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omonia 29is Maiou is 86% better for: goals scored per game.

1.95 goals / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.05 goals / game - MEAP Nisou

Omonia 29is Maiou is 59% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.05 goals / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.67 goals / game - MEAP Nisou

Omonia 29is Maiou scoring profile: very strong

Omonia 29is Maiou scores in 86% of games (18 of 21 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: strong

MEAP Nisou scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while Omonia 29is Maiou keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 meczów).

41Goals scored (season)22
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
22Goals conceded (season)35
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
3Average goals per game2.71
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
9Goals scored (last 5)4
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal67%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
48%2 goals24%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
29%3 goals10%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
14%4 goals5%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal71%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
33%2 goals48%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
10%3 goals24%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0%4 goals10%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
Omonia 29is Maiou - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 21 meczów
49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time29%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
14%BTTS in both halves0%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
38%Scored in both halves19%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
80%BTTS - last 540%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Omonia 29is Maiou is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.14 pts / game - MEAP Nisou

Omonia 29is Maiou - half-time state
43% leading33% draw24% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
24% leading43% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per game (1st half)1.14
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.52
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
57%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
48%No goal before half-time52%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

1.81Points per game (2nd half)1.1
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.19
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
57%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou
29%No goal after half-time62%
Omonia 29is MaiouMEAP Nisou

Omonia 29is Maiou - second-half results

52% W24% D24% L
34
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

24% W38% D38% L
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Omonia 29is Maiou - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
MEAP Nisou - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Omonia 29is Maiou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
11
3
31-45
6
2
46-60
9
2
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
11
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+145%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Omonia 29is Maiou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Omonia 29is MaiouLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals per game 3.002.59 2.71
Both teams scored 57%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%46% 48%
Clean sheets 38%30% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%72% 76%
Goal after half-time 90%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+-5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri

Head-to-head

Record from Omonia 29is Maiou's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against MEAP Nisou. Games average 7.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished Omonia 29is Maiou 1:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?

Omonia 29is Maiou score 1.95 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.05. The Second Division average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Omonia 29is Maiou's matches and 48% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are Omonia 29is Maiou and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games Omonia 29is Maiou have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.