United States - MLSInter&Co StadiumData current as of October 14, 2026

Orlando City vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics

Orlando City crest
Orlando City
1 : 1half-time 0:1
FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati

Orlando City vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Orlando City played against FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Inter&Co Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Orlando City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. FC Cincinnati has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Orlando City scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 2.61. FC Cincinnati scores 2.50 and allows 2.44. Games in this league average 3.22 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 61% of Orlando City's games and 78% of FC Cincinnati's. The Over 2.5 rates are 72% and 72%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.37 per game. Orlando City takes 11.9 shots per game, while FC Cincinnati takes 13.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Orlando City leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.39 after halftime.

When the teams score

Orlando City's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For FC Cincinnati, it is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.22 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 8.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Orlando City have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 50% of their home matches, while FC Cincinnati win just 11% of their away games. The hosts average 1.88 goals scored and 1.63 conceded at home, whereas Cincinnati score almost exactly the same number away from home, 1.89, but allow opponents to score as many as 2.78 goals per match. FC Cincinnati are in better recent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and scoring 14 goals in the process, compared with Orlando’s 3 wins and 10 goals. Nevertheless, the visitors have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match, while their average xG conceded on the road stands at 1.93, which should give Orlando plenty of opportunities. Both sides have similar attacking potential in terms of xG—1.40 for the hosts versus 1.44 for the visitors—but Orlando’s stronger home results point towards a narrow victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong, as BTTS occurred in 67% of Orlando City matches and as many as 89% of FC Cincinnati games, well above the league average of 61%. Orlando scores an average of 3.11 goals per match, while Cincinnati averages 1.89, with both defenses allowing plenty of goals: 2.11 and 2.78 goals conceded per game, respectively. Particularly significant is the fact that Cincinnati have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, while Orlando have failed to score in just 11% of their games. The form over the last five matches also supports the BTTS - Yes option: the hosts averaged 2.0 goals, the visitors 2.8, while BTTS occurred in 60% and 80% of those games, respectively. The high xG figures for both sides—1.72 for Orlando and 1.44 for Cincinnati this season—alongside xG against values of 1.70 and 1.93, point to genuine scoring opportunities for both teams.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have very strong goal-scoring profiles: Orlando matches average 3.11 goals, while FC Cincinnati concede a combined average of 2.78 goals per game. The Over 1.5 line has landed in 89% of matches for both teams, with at least one goal scored in 100% of their respective fixtures. Recent form also points to an open game, as Orlando have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances and Cincinnati as many as 14, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of both teams’ matches during this period. The hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.72, whereas the visitors face opponents generating an average of 1.93 xG against them, strengthening the outlook for Orlando goals. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5, combining near-perfect historical consistency with high goal averages for both sides.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Orlando City have a clearly superior overall season record: they win 67% of their matches and average 2.11 points per game, whereas FC Cincinnati win only 11% of their matches and average 0.78 points. However, a draw is the most likely HT outcome, as the hosts have been level at half-time in 44% of their matches, compared with 56% for the visitors. Cincinnati are in good current form, with four wins in their last five matches and an average of 1.6 goals before the break, which reduces confidence in Orlando taking an early lead. After the interval, the hosts’ advantage should increase: Orlando score an average of 1.89 goals in second halves, while Cincinnati concede 1.56. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an Orlando City victory best combines a cautious start with the hosts’ superior season-long quality and stronger second-half performance.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
18Shots11
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
5Shots on target3
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1.85xG1.27
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
10Corners5
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
52Dangerous attacks49
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
7Fouls12
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1Cards2
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1.67Goals scored / game2.5
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
2.61Goals allowed / game2.44
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
46%Average possession49%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
4.94Shots on target / game5.94
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.89Shots per game13.83
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
4.94Shots on target5.94
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
14%Shot conversion18.1%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
46%Possession49%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1.37xG for1.58
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
2.01xG against1.82
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

Shooting quality

Orlando City: Counter-attackingFC Cincinnati: Efficient finishing
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
Accuracy (shots on target)42%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Cincinnati is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Orlando City · 2 pts / game - FC Cincinnati

Orlando City
DLWWL
Season result split
33% W11% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-10
1.11 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FC Cincinnati
DWWLW
Season result split
39% W28% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-6
1.44 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Orlando City · 2.5 goals / game - FC Cincinnati

FC Cincinnati is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.61 goals / game - Orlando City · 2.44 goals / game - FC Cincinnati

Orlando City scoring profile: very strong

Orlando City scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 games).

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 games), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 games).

30Goals scored (season)45
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
47Goals conceded (season)44
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
4.28Average goals per game4.94
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
10Goals scored (last 5)18
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
10Goals conceded (last 5)12
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal89%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
50%2 goals72%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
22%3 goals50%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
22%4 goals28%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal89%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
61%2 goals72%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
50%3 goals44%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
28%4 goals22%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time67%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
6%BTTS in both halves50%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
28%Scored in both halves56%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS72%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time78%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time44%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time72%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
44%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Orlando City - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing
FC Cincinnati - half-time state
22% leading50% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per game (1st half)1.17
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
0.72Goals scored (1st half)1.11
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1.22Goals conceded (1st half)1.11
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1.94Average goals (1st half)2.22
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
44%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
50%No goal before half-time22%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per game (2nd half)1.44
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)1.39
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
1.39Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
2.33Average goals (2nd half)2.72
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
33%Clean sheet after half-time22%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati
50%No goal after half-time33%
Orlando CityFC Cincinnati

Orlando City - second-half results

33% W11% D56% L
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

39% W28% D33% L
21
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Orlando City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.81.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
FC Cincinnati - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game1.62.0
Goals allowed / game1.41.0
Average goals per game3.03.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
9
8
16-30
2
9
31-45
5
9
46-60
7
4
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
9
16-30
13
8
31-45
6
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
16
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.61
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 2.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
143%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+74%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
193%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.92
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
185%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Orlando CityLigaFC Cincinnati
Average goals per game▲ 4.283.22▲ 4.94
Both teams scored• 61%61%▲ 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 72%61%▲ 72%
Clean sheets▼ 11%22%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%77%• 78%
Goal after half-time▲ 94%80%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.87
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiGoalPavel Bucha
  2. Orlando CityYellow cardRobin Jansson
  3. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Adrián Marín GómezOff: Bernardo Rhein Goncalves
  4. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Brian AnungaOff: Obinna Nwobodo
  5. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Marco PasalicOff: Joran Gerbet
  6. Orlando CityGoalTyrese SpicerAssist: Justin Ellis
  7. FC CincinnatiYellow cardEvander da Silva Ferreira
  8. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Wilder José Cartagena MendozaOff: Justin Ellis
  9. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Kyle SmithOff: Samuel Gidi
  10. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Daryl DikeOff: Tyrese Spicer
  11. FC CincinnatiYellow cardMatt Miazga
  12. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Teenage Lingani HadebeOff: Matt Miazga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Orlando City's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against FC Cincinnati. Games average 8.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Orlando City vs FC Cincinnati?

The MLS match finished Orlando City 1:1 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Orlando City vs FC Cincinnati?

Orlando City score 1.67 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 2.50. The MLS average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Orlando City's matches and 78% of FC Cincinnati's.

What form are Orlando City and FC Cincinnati in?

Over the last 5 games Orlando City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orlando City vs FC Cincinnati?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Orlando City vs FC Cincinnati: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.