Paços de Ferreira vs FC Penafiel: match statistics
Paços de Ferreira vs FC Penafiel: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paços de Ferreira played against FC Penafiel in LigaPro (Portugal). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Venue: Estádio Capital do Móvel. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Paços de Ferreira has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FC Penafiel has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Paços de Ferreira scores 0.97 goals per game and allows 1.42. FC Penafiel scores 1.09 and allows 1.12. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Paços de Ferreira's games and 42% of FC Penafiel's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 36%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paços de Ferreira has the higher season xG average, 1.40 to 1.31 per game. Paços de Ferreira takes 12.4 shots per game, while FC Penafiel takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Paços de Ferreira leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. FC Penafiel leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paços de Ferreira's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For FC Penafiel, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LigaPro games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X). Paços de Ferreira at home averages 14.56 shots and 4.69 on target per match with xG 1.64, while FC Penafiel away averages 10.56 shots, 3.31 on target and xG 1.21, giving the hosts an edge in chance creation (by 0.43 xG). The visitors, however, are in better short-term form — they scored 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match) and collected 9 points in that period (1.8 points per match), whereas Paços scored 6 goals and earned 5 points (1.0 per match). Defensively both teams are similar: hosts concede 1.31 goals at home, visitors concede 1.38 away, and season-to-date Paços have conceded 47 goals versus Penafiel's 37. Additionally Paços have 44% draws in home fixtures, and Penafiel have lost 56% of away matches, therefore I estimate probabilities at roughly 33% home win, 40% draw and 27% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I select the BTTS - Yes scenario because recent indicators point to increased goal activity from both sides. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS at 60% (3/5), with Paços scoring 6 goals (1.2 per match) and conceding 8 (1.6), while Penafiel scored 12 (2.4) and conceded 10 (2.0). xG stats support scoring chances: Paços has xG_for 1.38 and xG_against 1.43, Penafiel xG_for 1.21 and xG_against 1.64 — both sides create above ~1.2 xG and are exposed to opponent opportunities. Seasonal figures are mixed (Paços season BTTS 35% and 47% clean sheets vs Penafiel season BTTS 50%), but the away side’s recent form and high efficiency in the last 5 matches (12 goals) clearly favor BTTS. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 64% (yes) vs 36% (no).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives Paços de Ferreira 1.51 xG (attack xG 1.38 and xG against 1.64) and FC Penafiel 1.32 xG (1.21 and 1.43), totaling 2.83 expected goals. This season Paços average 1.12 goals scored and 0.88 conceded, while Penafiel average 1.06 scored and 1.38 conceded; the home side averages 4.12 shots on target versus the visitors’ 3.31, which supports goal potential. Season-long Over 2.5 occurs in 24% of Paços matches and 50% of Penafiel matches, but in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 was 40% for Paços and 80% for Penafiel, and in their last 5 matches the teams scored 6 and 12 goals respectively (18 combined). Since the expected 2.83 goals exceeds the 2.5 line by 0.33 and recent form favors more goals, I recommend backing Over 2.5; Over 3.5 looks much less likely (seasonally 6% for the home team and 25% for the visitors).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I choose X/1 (draw at half-time, Paços de Ferreira to win) because a half-time draw is the dominant scenario in the data – home sides draw at half-time in 53% of matches and the away team in 56%, so there is a high base for a draw after 45 minutes. After the break Paços are favored by superior metrics: the home side has higher xG (1.38 vs 1.21), more shots on target (4.12 vs 3.31) and a higher average points per game at home (1.53 pts vs 0.94 for the away team), so they have greater potential to seize the initiative. Second-half statistics confirm this tendency – at least one goal is scored after the break in 82% of Paços matches; the home side scores on average 0.65 goals after half-time and concedes 0.47 (scored_2hg_avg_home 0.65 vs conceded_2hg_avg_home 0.47), and their share of second-half wins is 41% versus 31% for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts led at the break in 4 of the matches so far (24%) and have HTPPG 1.24 versus 0.56 for the visitors, which increases the chance of a turnaround and a win after the break; therefore X/1 receives the highest probability (32%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paços de Ferreira | FC Penafiel | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FC Penafiel is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Paços de Ferreira · 1.8 pts / game - FC Penafiel
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Penafiel is 12% better for: goals scored per game.
0.97 goals / game - Paços de Ferreira · 1.09 goals / game - FC Penafiel
FC Penafiel is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.42 goals / game - Paços de Ferreira · 1.12 goals / game - FC Penafiel
Paços de Ferreira scores in 52% of games (17 of 33 meczów), while FC Penafiel keeps a clean sheet in 39% (13 of 33 meczów).
FC Penafiel scores in 67% of games (22 of 33 meczów), while Paços de Ferreira keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paços de Ferreira
Over / Under - FC Penafiel
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paços de Ferreira - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FC Penafiel - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paços de Ferreira
FC Penafiel
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).
Teams vs league
| Paços de Ferreira | Liga | FC Penafiel | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.39 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | • 45% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 32% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 76% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Paços de Ferreira's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against FC Penafiel. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Paços de Ferreira vs FC Penafiel?
The LigaPro match finished Paços de Ferreira 2:1 FC Penafiel. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Paços de Ferreira vs FC Penafiel?
Paços de Ferreira score 0.97 goals per game on average and FC Penafiel 1.09. The LigaPro average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Paços de Ferreira's matches and 42% of FC Penafiel's.
What form are Paços de Ferreira and FC Penafiel in?
Over the last 5 games Paços de Ferreira have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FC Penafiel 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paços de Ferreira vs FC Penafiel?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paços de Ferreira vs FC Penafiel: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


