PAEEK vs Nea Salamis: match statistics
Nea Salamis displays impressive form as the league leader with a season record of 20 wins, 2 draws, and 0 defeats. The visiting team has a perfect 100% away win rate (11 consecutive victories), scoring an average of 2.27 goals while conceding just 0.55 per away match. PAEEK, although sitting in second place with a solid home record (64% win rate), is experiencing a dip in form with only one victory in their last five matches (0.8 PPG). The difference in form and quality between the teams is significant - Nea Salamis has the edge in expected goals (xG 1.88 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and ball possession efficiency (both average 57%, but the visitors are more clinical), and they never fail to score on the road (FTS% 0%). Given the visitors' dominance, their unbeaten away streak, and the hosts' weakened form, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory.
PAEEK vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PAEEK played against Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on March 13, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
PAEEK has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Nea Salamis has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
PAEEK scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 0.91. Nea Salamis scores 1.95 and allows 0.45. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of PAEEK's games and 36% of Nea Salamis's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 41%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.39 per game. PAEEK takes 8.2 shots per game, while Nea Salamis takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
PAEEK leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 64% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
PAEEK's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Nea Salamis, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis displays impressive form as the league leader with a season record of 20 wins, 2 draws, and 0 defeats. The visiting team has a perfect 100% away win rate (11 consecutive victories), scoring an average of 2.27 goals while conceding just 0.55 per away match. PAEEK, although sitting in second place with a solid home record (64% win rate), is experiencing a dip in form with only one victory in their last five matches (0.8 PPG). The difference in form and quality between the teams is significant - Nea Salamis has the edge in expected goals (xG 1.88 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and ball possession efficiency (both average 57%, but the visitors are more clinical), and they never fail to score on the road (FTS% 0%). Given the visitors' dominance, their unbeaten away streak, and the hosts' weakened form, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PAEEK | Nea Salamis | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nea Salamis is 275% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - PAEEK · 3 pts / game - Nea Salamis
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.48 goals / game - PAEEK · 1.95 goals / game - Nea Salamis
Nea Salamis is 102% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.91 goals / game - PAEEK · 0.45 goals / game - Nea Salamis
PAEEK scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 64% (14 of 22 meczów).
Nea Salamis scores in 91% of games (20 of 22 meczów), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PAEEK
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / game - PAEEK · 2.27 pts / game - Nea Salamis
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PAEEK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 91%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PAEEK
Nea Salamis
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| PAEEK | Liga | Nea Salamis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.39 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 47% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 29% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from PAEEK's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Nea Salamis. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?
The Second Division match finished PAEEK 0:0 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PAEEK and Nea Salamis?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches PAEEK won 0, Nea Salamis won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?
PAEEK score 1.48 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.95. The Second Division average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 48% of PAEEK's matches and 36% of Nea Salamis's.
What form are PAEEK and Nea Salamis in?
Over the last 5 games PAEEK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Nea Salamis 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.