Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 16 July 2026

PAEEK vs Nea Salamis: match statistics

PAEEK crest
PAEEK
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis
120%(4.50)
X25%(3.35)
255%(1.73)

Nea Salamis displays impressive form as the league leader with a season record of 20 wins, 2 draws, and 0 defeats. The visiting team has a perfect 100% away win rate (11 consecutive victories), scoring an average of 2.27 goals while conceding just 0.55 per away match. PAEEK, although sitting in second place with a solid home record (64% win rate), is experiencing a dip in form with only one victory in their last five matches (0.8 PPG). The difference in form and quality between the teams is significant - Nea Salamis has the edge in expected goals (xG 1.88 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and ball possession efficiency (both average 57%, but the visitors are more clinical), and they never fail to score on the road (FTS% 0%). Given the visitors' dominance, their unbeaten away streak, and the hosts' weakened form, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory.

PAEEK vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PAEEK play Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 13 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

PAEEK: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Nea Salamis: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

PAEEK scores 1.45 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Nea Salamis scores 1.93 and concedes 0.54. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PAEEK 48%, Nea Salamis 39%. Over 2.5: PAEEK 48%, Nea Salamis 46%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.40. PAEEK: 6.7 shots per match, Nea Salamis: 10.2.

Match halves

PAEEK: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.59. Nea Salamis: half-time lead 61%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

PAEEK: 31-45+ (10 goals). Nea Salamis: 16-30 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Nea Salamis displays impressive form as the league leader with a season record of 20 wins, 2 draws, and 0 defeats. The visiting team has a perfect 100% away win rate (11 consecutive victories), scoring an average of 2.27 goals while conceding just 0.55 per away match. PAEEK, although sitting in second place with a solid home record (64% win rate), is experiencing a dip in form with only one victory in their last five matches (0.8 PPG). The difference in form and quality between the teams is significant - Nea Salamis has the edge in expected goals (xG 1.88 vs 1.58 for the hosts) and ball possession efficiency (both average 57%, but the visitors are more clinical), and they never fail to score on the road (FTS% 0%). Given the visitors' dominance, their unbeaten away streak, and the hosts' weakened form, the most probable outcome is a Nea Salamis victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
PAEEKNea Salamis
-1Shots-1
PAEEKNea Salamis
-1Shots on target-1
PAEEKNea Salamis
0xG0
PAEEKNea Salamis
6Corners2
PAEEKNea Salamis
44Dangerous attacks33
PAEEKNea Salamis
-1Fouls-1
PAEEKNea Salamis
-1Cards-1
PAEEKNea Salamis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.45Goals scored / match1.93
PAEEKNea Salamis
1.07Goals conceded / match0.54
PAEEKNea Salamis
39%Average possession40%
PAEEKNea Salamis
3.17Shots on target / match3.93
PAEEKNea Salamis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.72Shots per match10.18
PAEEKNea Salamis
3.17Shots on target3.93
PAEEKNea Salamis
21.5%Shot conversion18.9%
PAEEKNea Salamis
39%Possession40%
PAEEKNea Salamis
1.4xG for1.81
PAEEKNea Salamis
1.25xG against0.94
PAEEKNea Salamis

Shooting quality

PAEEK: Counter-attackingNea Salamis: Counter-attacking
PAEEKNea Salamis
Accuracy (shots on target)47%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.210.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - PAEEK · 2 pts / match - Nea Salamis

PAEEK
WDDLD
Season result split
41% W34% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-1
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
LDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Nea Salamis
WDWLW
Season result split
82% W14% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-4-1
2.61 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - PAEEK · 1.93 goals / match - Nea Salamis

Nea Salamis is 98% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - PAEEK · 0.54 goals / match - Nea Salamis

PAEEK scoring profile: mixed

PAEEK scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 57% (16 of 28 matches).

Nea Salamis scoring profile: strong

Nea Salamis scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).

42Goals scored (season)54
PAEEKNea Salamis
31Goals conceded (season)15
PAEEKNea Salamis
2.52Average goals in match2.46
PAEEKNea Salamis
8Goals scored (last 5)11
PAEEKNea Salamis
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
PAEEKNea Salamis

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal86%
PAEEKNea Salamis
45%2 goals68%
PAEEKNea Salamis
24%3 goals25%
PAEEKNea Salamis
3%4 goals14%
PAEEKNea Salamis

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal43%
PAEEKNea Salamis
31%2 goals11%
PAEEKNea Salamis
10%3 goals0%
PAEEKNea Salamis
7%4 goals0%
PAEEKNea Salamis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time21%
PAEEKNea Salamis
0%BTTS in both halves7%
PAEEKNea Salamis
21%Scored in both halves46%
PAEEKNea Salamis

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
PAEEKNea Salamis
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
PAEEKNea Salamis
60%BTTS - last 560%
PAEEKNea Salamis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
PAEEKNea Salamis
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
PAEEKNea Salamis
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PAEEKNea Salamis

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
PAEEKNea Salamis
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
PAEEKNea Salamis
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
PAEEKNea Salamis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - PAEEK · 2.21 pts / match - Nea Salamis

PAEEK - half-time state
28% leading55% draw17% trailing
Nea Salamis - half-time state
61% leading39% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)2.21
PAEEKNea Salamis
0.86Goals scored (1st half)1.14
PAEEKNea Salamis
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
PAEEKNea Salamis
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.36
PAEEKNea Salamis
59%Clean sheet before half-time79%
PAEEKNea Salamis
48%No goal before half-time29%
PAEEKNea Salamis

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.89
PAEEKNea Salamis
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
PAEEKNea Salamis
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
PAEEKNea Salamis
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.11
PAEEKNea Salamis
66%Clean sheet after half-time71%
PAEEKNea Salamis
59%No goal after half-time39%
PAEEKNea Salamis

PAEEK - second-half results

28% W48% R24% P
40
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - second-half results

50% W39% R11% P
62
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 61% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PAEEK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+7-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
9
4
16-30
10
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
13
3
16-30
9
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
13
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

PAEEKLigaNea Salamis
Average goals in match 2.522.72 2.46
Both teams scored 48%49% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 46%
Clean sheets 48%30% 57%
Goal before half-time 66%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 62%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PAEEK 0 - 0 - 2 Nea Salamis. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?

The Second Division match finished PAEEK 0:0 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PAEEK and Nea Salamis?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PAEEK won 0, Nea Salamis won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?

PAEEK score 1.45 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.93. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of PAEEK's matches and 39% of Nea Salamis's.

What form are PAEEK and Nea Salamis in?

Over the last 5 games PAEEK have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Nea Salamis 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAEEK vs Nea Salamis?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.