Paide vs Nõmme United: match statistics
Paide vs Nõmme United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paide played against Nõmme United in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: Paide linnastaadion. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Paide has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Nõmme United has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Paide scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.32. Nõmme United scores 1.74 and allows 2.35. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of Paide's games and 83% of Nõmme United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 91%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paide has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.46 per game. Paide takes 14.0 shots per game, while Nõmme United takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Paide leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Nõmme United leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.09 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paide's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Nõmme United, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Meistriliiga games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Paide have a clearly stronger home record, winning 60% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.30 goals and conceding just 0.90. Away from home, Nõmme United allow opponents to score an average of 2.64 goals, have kept no clean sheets, and have a high average xG conceded of 2.11. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording an xG of 1.57 compared with the visitors’ 1.24, while also enjoying more possession, 55% to 45%. Paide’s weaker recent form is a warning sign, having scored just 4 goals in their last five matches, compared with Nõmme United’s 15. Despite the visitors’ improved attacking output, their highly unstable defense and 55% away-loss rate strongly support a Paide victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal signal for both teams to score is very strong: BTTS occurred in 83% of Paide matches and 82% of Nõmme United matches, clearly above the league average of 59%. Neither team has kept a clean sheet, while Paide’s and Nõmme United’s opponents have averaged 1.99 and 2.11 xG respectively against them, supporting a goal for both sides. Paide average 2.08 goals and 4.92 shots on target per match at home, while Nõmme United average 1.36 goals, rising to 3.0 across their last five appearances. The hosts’ recent form is weaker, as they scored only 0.8 goals per match and BTTS landed in 60% of their last five games; however, their defense conceded 1.6 goals during this period. Nõmme United have also conceded 1.8 goals per match recently, making it more likely that they will score at least once in response to goals from either side. This supports the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal market, rather than BTTS - No, which means that at least one team fails to score—not automatically a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither team scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly points to goals: Paide have recorded matches with at least 2 goals in 92% of their games, while the figure for Nõmme United is 100%. The 2.5 line has been covered in 92% and 91% of their matches, respectively, compared with a league average of 65%, confirming the above-average open nature of this fixture. Neither team has kept a single clean sheet, and both concede more than 2 goals per match on average: Paide 2.08, Nõmme United 2.64. The xG-based model projects a total of 3.35 goals, with the hosts averaging 1.66 xG against 2.11 xG conceded by their opponents, while the visitors record 1.24 xG offensively against 1.99 xG allowed by Paide. The safest signal remains Over 1.5, as the season data almost unanimously points to at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Paide win, as the hosts have been level at the break in 40% of their last five matches, compared with 25% for Nõmme United. Paide create more chances: their average xG stands at 1.66 versus 1.24 for the visitors, while they average 4.92 shots on target per match compared with their opponents’ 3.18. The second half is decisive, with the hosts scoring an average of 1.33 goals and losing the second half in only 33% of matches, whereas Nõmme United concede as many as 1.45 goals after the break. Both defenses regularly allow goals, as shown by neither team keeping a clean sheet and by the percentage of matches in which both sides score: 83% for Paide and 82% for Nõmme United. Paide have started their recent matches poorly, scoring just 0.2 goals before half-time, which makes a second-half turnaround or decisive result more likely than the hosts taking the lead from the outset.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paide | Nõmme United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Paide is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Paide · 1.2 pts / game - Nõmme United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nõmme United is 12% better for: goals scored per game.
1.55 goals / game - Paide · 1.74 goals / game - Nõmme United
Paide is 78% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.32 goals / game - Paide · 2.35 goals / game - Nõmme United
Paide scores in 91% of games (20 of 22 meczów), while Nõmme United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 23 meczów).
Nõmme United scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 meczów), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paide
Over / Under - Nõmme United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paide is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / game - Paide · 0.91 pts / game - Nõmme United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paide - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nõmme United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paide
Nõmme United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Paide | Liga | Nõmme United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.86 | 3.08 | ▲ 4.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 57% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▲ 91% |
| Clean sheets | • 23% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 75% | ▲ 91% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 89% | ▲ 96% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PaideYellow cardKristofer Käit
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Paide's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Nõmme United. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Paide vs Nõmme United?
The Meistriliiga match finished Paide 4:1 Nõmme United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Paide and Nõmme United?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Paide won 2, Nõmme United won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Paide vs Nõmme United?
Paide score 1.55 goals per game on average and Nõmme United 1.74. The Meistriliiga average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Paide's matches and 83% of Nõmme United's.
What form are Paide and Nõmme United in?
Over the last 5 games Paide have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Nõmme United 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paide vs Nõmme United?
The statistical background for Paide vs Nõmme United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


