Hungary - NB IData current as of October 14, 2026

Paksi SE vs ETO: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Paksi SE vs ETO: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Paksi SE plays ETO in NB I (Hungary). The game is scheduled for October 17, 2026.

Recent form

Paksi SE has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. ETO has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Paksi SE scores 2.11 goals per game and allows 1.89. ETO scores 1.78 and allows 1.22. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Paksi SE's games and 56% of ETO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Paksi SE has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.28 per game. Paksi SE takes 14.3 shots per game, while ETO takes 10.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Paksi SE leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 1.11 goals per game after halftime. ETO leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Paksi SE's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For ETO, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(1.95)
(4.00)
(3.05)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.11Goals scored / game1.78
Paksi SEETO
1.89Goals allowed / game1.22
Paksi SEETO
49%Average possession52%
Paksi SEETO
6.56Shots on target / game4
Paksi SEETO

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.33Shots per game10.22
Paksi SEETO
6.56Shots on target4
Paksi SEETO
14.7%Shot conversion17.4%
Paksi SEETO
49%Possession52%
Paksi SEETO
1.93xG for1.28
Paksi SEETO
1.53xG against1.75
Paksi SEETO

Shooting quality

Paksi SE: AttackingETO: Efficient finishing
Paksi SEETO
Accuracy (shots on target)46%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Paksi SE is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Paksi SE · 1.4 pts / game - ETO

Paksi SE
WDLWW
Season result split
44% W22% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
ETO
DLWWL
Season result split
44% W33% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-2
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-0
Last 5 away
1-3-0
DDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paksi SE is 19% better for: goals scored per game.

2.11 goals / game - Paksi SE · 1.78 goals / game - ETO

ETO is 55% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.89 goals / game - Paksi SE · 1.22 goals / game - ETO

Paksi SE scoring profile: very strong

Paksi SE scores in 100% of games (9 of 9 games), while ETO keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).

ETO scoring profile: very strong

ETO scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while Paksi SE keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).

19Goals scored (season)16
Paksi SEETO
17Goals conceded (season)11
Paksi SEETO
4Average goals per game3
Paksi SEETO
9Goals scored (last 5)6
Paksi SEETO
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Paksi SEETO

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal78%
Paksi SEETO
78%2 goals56%
Paksi SEETO
22%3 goals33%
Paksi SEETO
11%4 goals11%
Paksi SEETO

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal78%
Paksi SEETO
56%2 goals33%
Paksi SEETO
33%3 goals11%
Paksi SEETO
22%4 goals0%
Paksi SEETO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time11%
Paksi SEETO
22%BTTS in both halves0%
Paksi SEETO
44%Scored in both halves22%
Paksi SEETO

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Paksi SEETO
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
Paksi SEETO
40%BTTS - last 560%
Paksi SEETO

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Paksi SEETO
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
Paksi SEETO
44%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Paksi SEETO

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Paksi SEETO
78%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Paksi SEETO
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time44%
Paksi SEETO

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ETO is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - Paksi SE · 1.44 pts / game - ETO

Paksi SE - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
ETO - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.44
Paksi SEETO
1Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Paksi SEETO
1.11Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Paksi SEETO
2.11Average goals (1st half)0.78
Paksi SEETO
56%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Paksi SEETO
33%No goal before half-time56%
Paksi SEETO

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per game (2nd half)1.67
Paksi SEETO
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
Paksi SEETO
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Paksi SEETO
1.89Average goals (2nd half)2.22
Paksi SEETO
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Paksi SEETO
22%No goal after half-time44%
Paksi SEETO

Paksi SE - second-half results

33% W56% D11% L
10
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

ETO - second-half results

44% W33% D22% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Paksi SE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
ETO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Paksi SE
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

ETO
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Paksi SE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

Paksi SELigaETO
Average goals per game▲ 4.003.19▼ 3.00
Both teams scored• 67%66%▼ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%60%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 33%19%▲ 22%
Goal before half-time• 67%68%• 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 89%81%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
66%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Paksi SE's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against ETO. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Paksi SE
3 : 4
Győri ETO FC
Győri ETO FC
0 : 0
Paksi SE
Paksi SE
3 : 3
Győri ETO FC

FAQ

When do Paksi SE and ETO play?

Paksi SE face ETO on October 17, 2026 in NB I. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paksi SE and ETO?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Paksi SE won 0, ETO won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paksi SE vs ETO?

Paksi SE score 2.11 goals per game on average and ETO 1.78. The NB I average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Paksi SE's matches and 56% of ETO's.

What form are Paksi SE and ETO in?

Over the last 5 games Paksi SE have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and ETO 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paksi SE vs ETO?

The statistical background for Paksi SE vs ETO — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.