Lithuania - A LygaPanevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionasData current as of 17 July 2026

Panevėžys vs Banga: match statistics

Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Banga crest
Banga

Panevėžys vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Panevėžys play Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 16:00. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Panevėžys: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Banga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Panevėžys scores 0.95 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Banga scores 1.48 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panevėžys 57%, Banga 33%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 62%, Banga 38%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Banga has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.26. Panevėžys: 11.0 shots per match, Banga: 12.1.

Match halves

Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.38. Banga: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Panevėžys: 31-45+ (7 goals). Banga: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 2-3-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 60%.

Match description

Season-long metrics favor Banga: the visitors have scored 21 goals versus Panevėžys’ 13 and boast a superior goal difference (11 conceded vs 21). Away, Banga concedes just 0.43 goals per game and records 57% clean sheets, while Panevėžys concede 0.83 goals at home with only 17% clean sheets, giving a clear defensive edge to the visitors. Offensively Banga also holds a slight advantage — away xG is 1.51 versus the home side’s 1.38, with shots on target 4.86 vs 4.33 and conversion rates of 9% vs 8% indicating better chance efficiency. In the last 5 matches Panevėžys have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss with 10 goals (averaging 2 points per game), whereas Banga is unbeaten in five (2 wins, 3 draws, 9 goals, averaging 1.8 points), noting that the home team fail to score in 33% of home appearances while Banga are goalless in 43% of away ties. Given the visitors’ defensive solidity and higher xG, I predict a Banga win; probability distribution: 25% home, 30% draw, 45% away.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
PanevėžysBanga
3Shots19
PanevėžysBanga
2Shots on target7
PanevėžysBanga
0.54xG2.14
PanevėžysBanga
4Corners9
PanevėžysBanga
27Dangerous attacks63
PanevėžysBanga
9Fouls5
PanevėžysBanga
3Cards1
PanevėžysBanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.95Goals scored / match1.48
PanevėžysBanga
1.81Goals conceded / match0.67
PanevėžysBanga
47%Average possession45%
PanevėžysBanga
3.76Shots on target / match4.14
PanevėžysBanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match12.1
PanevėžysBanga
3.76Shots on target4.14
PanevėžysBanga
8.7%Shot conversion12.2%
PanevėžysBanga
47%Possession45%
PanevėžysBanga
1.26xG for1.39
PanevėžysBanga
1.64xG against1.21
PanevėžysBanga

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedBanga: Counter-attacking
PanevėžysBanga
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Banga is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Panevėžys · 2.6 pts / match - Banga

Panevėžys
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Banga
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
48% W29% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-5
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banga is 56% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.48 goals / match - Banga

Banga is 170% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.81 goals / match - Panevėžys · 0.67 goals / match - Banga

Panevėžys scoring profile: mixed

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

Banga scoring profile: very strong

Banga scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

20Goals scored (season)31
PanevėžysBanga
38Goals conceded (season)14
PanevėžysBanga
2.76Average goals in match2.14
PanevėžysBanga
5Goals scored (last 5)9
PanevėžysBanga
11Goals conceded (last 5)1
PanevėžysBanga

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
PanevėžysBanga
24%2 goals48%
PanevėžysBanga
5%3 goals19%
PanevėžysBanga
0%4 goals10%
PanevėžysBanga

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
PanevėžysBanga
48%2 goals10%
PanevėžysBanga
33%3 goals0%
PanevėžysBanga
14%4 goals0%
PanevėžysBanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time14%
PanevėžysBanga
10%BTTS in both halves0%
PanevėžysBanga
10%Scored in both halves29%
PanevėžysBanga

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
PanevėžysBanga
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
PanevėžysBanga
60%BTTS - last 520%
PanevėžysBanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
PanevėžysBanga
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
PanevėžysBanga
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PanevėžysBanga

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PanevėžysBanga
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
PanevėžysBanga
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
PanevėžysBanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Banga is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.38 pts / match - Banga

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading24% draw43% trailing
Banga - half-time state
29% leading52% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.38
PanevėžysBanga
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.62
PanevėžysBanga
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
PanevėžysBanga
1.52Average goals (1st half)0.95
PanevėžysBanga
38%Clean sheet before half-time71%
PanevėžysBanga
57%No goal before half-time62%
PanevėžysBanga

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.81
PanevėžysBanga
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
PanevėžysBanga
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
PanevėžysBanga
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.19
PanevėžysBanga
43%Clean sheet after half-time67%
PanevėžysBanga
67%No goal after half-time43%
PanevėžysBanga

Panevėžys - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Banga - second-half results

52% W24% R24% P
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Banga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Banga
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
6
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.89
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaBanga
Average goals in match 2.762.58 2.14
Both teams scored 57%49% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 38%
Clean sheets 14%32% 43%
Goal before half-time 81%68% 52%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Panevėžys 2 - 3 - 0 Banga. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 60% matches.

FK Banga Gargždai
0 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Banga Gargždai
2 : 2
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai

FAQ

What was the result of Panevėžys vs Banga?

The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:0 Banga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Banga?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 2, Banga won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Banga?

Panevėžys score 0.95 goals per game on average and Banga 1.48. The A Lyga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Panevėžys's matches and 33% of Banga's.

What form are Panevėžys and Banga in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Banga 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Banga?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.